|
|
|
hi,
This is my humble request to Codeproject.
we are dealing and discussing with lot of technologies. That's ok and very good.
Why we can't start and R and D Section where programmers can share innovative ideas and new faces of S/W world.
**************************
S r e e j i t h N a i r
**************************
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
Why hackers are hacking s/w ?
ans : The answer may different based on hackers idology. So here i am not giving importence to this question or answer.
How hackers are hacking s/w ?
ans. They are putting little more idea and effort on the software that they are going to hack.
"According to me they are the real programmers "
why i will tell you. " they are putting more effort than what poor programmers do "
**************************
S r e e j i t h N a i r
**************************
|
|
|
|
|
Are you suggesting that CPian's all take up hacking? Or that we all start hacking CP? Am I really in the suggestions forum? 
Look at the world about you and trust to your own convictions. - Ansel Adams
Meg's World - Blog
Photography
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
what i mean is we need to think little ahed than hacker on the time of development.
We do't need to hack or no need to hack hackers.
But we need to think better than hackers. that's it.
**************************
S r e e j i t h N a i r
**************************
|
|
|
|
|
Well if we think ahead of the hackers the hackers will see that we are trying to outsmart them and figure out what their next move will be so they will do something else that we didn't think of and then they will eventually succeed.
This is similar to terrorists. Most countries try to outsmart terrorists by working out what their next move will be and to block it. It means that many times the terrorist won't succeed, but they will keep trying and eventually they may actually strike.
I do not mean that we should just give up and let the hackers (or terrorists) free reign, however we must remain alert at all times and to block any avenues that appear to open for them. Sadly, they do win sometimes.
"If a man empties his purse into his head, no man can take it away from him, for an investment in knowledge pays the best interest." -- Joseph E. O'Donnell
Can't manage to P/Invoke that Win32 API in .NET? Why not do interop the wiki way!
|
|
|
|
|
sreejith ss nair wrote:
what i mean is we need to think little ahed than hacker on the time of development.
This is sometimes done, but hackers usually find ways around most things programmers do to *try* and stop them.
sreejith ss nair wrote:
But we need to think better than hackers. that's it.
We do? What if we are hackers? Can we outsmart ourselves?
sreejith ss nair wrote:
We do't need to hack or no need to hack hackers.
We may not need to, but I get a kick out of hacking other hackers' PCs just after they try me.
Aaron Eldreth
TheCollective4.com
My Articles
I hereby boycott this poll. Really....
- Leppie
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
ohhhhh.
So Now I Came To Know Hackers Have Two Brain.
**************************
S r e e j i t h N a i r
**************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
First of all, this is the best site that I go to. I get more help from this site (trying to provide what my small amount of knowledge I have myself along the way) than from any other site I've been to. There's one suggestion I have that would make it easier in my opinion and allow for better help. Sometimes I'll start a thread and two or three people will respond, but none of them have the answer. When I'm looking for threads to answer to, I usually look for ones with 0-1 replies thinking that it must've been resolved already. So when some 2 or 3 people reply to my post I think that other programmers that do know the answer might assume that my problem must've been resolved because they see a few replies. I think there should be a way to mark a thread as 'Resolved' so that if it's not, I (or a better qualified programmer) will know that that person still needs help. People should still be able to answer the thread if they have something to add, but that way people who still need help won't get looked over.
I'm not the brightest programmer in the world, so this might not be the brightest idea in the world. Besides, I don't know how hard it would be to implement. Just thought I'd offer a suggestion to a site that has helped me so much.!!
[insert witty comment here]
bdiamond
|
|
|
|
|
bdiamond wrote:
I think there should be a way to mark a thread as 'Resolved' so that if it's not, I (or a better qualified programmer) will know that that person still needs help.
While some people will use this mechanism - I think there are a lot of people who will just not mark their query as resolved because they are lazy or asked a question then disappeared or, most sadly, asked a question that is currently beyond their comprehension but refuse to admit it and want people to post source code without wanting to take the time to understand how it works.
It the mechanism were opened so that anyone could mark a thread as resolved then the system is open to abuse.
I hope I didn't sound too negative - I agree that it would be good to have some sort of mechanism so that resolved queries are so.
"If a man empties his purse into his head, no man can take it away from him, for an investment in knowledge pays the best interest." -- Joseph E. O'Donnell
Can't manage to P/Invoke that Win32 API in .NET? Why not do interop the wiki way!
|
|
|
|
|
understood, and I didn't take your response as negative. It's just that sometimes when that happens and I don't have my question answered in the least bit, I'd like others to know. (and I don't want to get in trouble for double-posting  ). Thanks for your reply.
[insert witty comment here]
bdiamond
|
|
|
|
|
bdiamond wrote:
I don't want to get in trouble for double-posting
Just wait a week in between posts. When you make the second attempt, you'll no doubt know more than you did the week before so the subject and body of the post will hopefully be a bit more fine-tuned than the first one. Make sense?
"When I was born I was so surprised that I didn't talk for a year and a half." - Gracie Allen
|
|
|
|
|
yes it does, and thanks for your earlier help also!!!
[insert witty comment here]
bdiamond 
|
|
|
|
|
I've recently added some server-side SPAM control to my domain and I'm noticing that mail from CodeProject is being filtered out as SPAM.
One thing my server is now doing to marking mail as SPAM if the IP address the message was received from does not have a reverse DNS entry. If I receive a message from CodeProject.com (e.g. 209.171.52.99) its IP address cannot be used to get the name of the domain. This can be seen with ping:
ping -a 209.171.52.99
Anyway this can be changed to avoid CodeProject message from being flagged as SPAM?
Thanks -- Peter
|
|
|
|
|
We've been working to get this fixed for a couple of weeks. I'll ping the relevant parties and see what's happening.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds good, thanks.
-- Peter
|
|
|
|
|
It's working again...
Thanks -- Peter
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! CodeProject is the one e-zine I get that I actually read.
I am sure that many of us would be interested in a hearing a bit about how it actually happened - how you began CodeProject & the trials and tribulations. Perhaps a monthly column or newsletter ?
Thanks!
James C. Deen
http://www.WayCoolGear.com
|
|
|
|
|
Well.... In the beginning there was a big bang....
Seriously, it has been posted somewhere before. I've just had a quick look and I can't find it just now. But to summarise: Chris used to work for CodeGuru but it got bought over by a company that was only interested in the profits generated by the revenues the site would bring and so CodeGuru began to suck. CodeProject was started originally as CodeTools until it was discovered there was another company with the same name, so it was renamed CodeProject. CodeProject has been steadily building up since and is now IMHO the best community driven developer web site for Microsoft development tools.
"If a man empties his purse into his head, no man can take it away from him, for an investment in knowledge pays the best interest." -- Joseph E. O'Donnell
Can't manage to P/Invoke that Win32 API in .NET? Why not do interop the wiki way!
|
|
|
|
|
I think a monthly column would be a good idea. A more detailed behind the scenes look at CodeProject would be nice, beyond what currently appears in the newsletter and has appeared in Chris's blog.
I doubt whether the CodeProject team would have time to do it, but it would be nice to see a joint column by the team as we all love a good war story and I'm sure we could all learn something from the trials and tribulations of running this site.
Some suggested titles,
* A day in the life of Chris Maunder.
* Editing articles on a slow internet connection by Nish
* Fixing Chris's bugs whilst he's away - by the rest of the team 
* How to keep one million users happy on a limited budget.
Michael
CP Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
You're a bad man, Michael
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Michael P Butler wrote:
Some suggested titles,
* A day in the life of Chris Maunder.
* Editing articles on a slow internet connection by Nish
* Fixing Chris's bugs whilst he's away - by the rest of the team
* How to keep one million users happy on a limited budget
Before announcing publicly that Mr Maunder codes on Coco Pops, give me a chance to buy some Kelloggs shares will you?
Look at the world about you and trust to your own convictions. - Ansel Adams
Meg's World - Blog
Photography
|
|
|
|
|
If I vote for the same message twice, I get a message saying I've already voted. It would be more helpful if the new vote would just override my older vote... occasionally I'll hit the wrong number by accident, or vote for the wrong message.
An expert is somebody who learns more and more about less and less, until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
