|
David Wulff wrote:
I don't know why you got voted a 1, but I agree with you.
That was me. My attempt at adding my reply was beaten by one of the usual CP gliches.
I worry that by adding syntax highlighting, we'll end up with more code dump questions. When posting faulty code, I believe the poster should only post what is necessary for demonstrating the error. This really should only be a small snippet and I don't see how syntax highlighting would be of benefit beyond eye-candy.
Michael
CP Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Well I agree to that point - also because CP would get even slower than now if every comment is parsed and syntax-colored.
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent idea.
Adn look - you've spotted a bug. Nice.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I was looking at:
http://www.codeproject.com/styles/global.css
while I was writing my last article, and I thought it would be nice if we could use UL.class for articles.
Others that might be nice to have include Control, CSFile, and so on.
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
plz can somebody explain me how member status works? I mean, is promoting automated, when does it happen, etc.
I know this user[^] who has posted an article quite while ago, and he is still no status... Shouldn't he be bronze?
surprisingly he's my friend 
[eqoism]and why am I bronze? I have posted article (and some posts) and I am member for more then year, so I think I should be silver...[/egoism]
Plz don't get me wrong, I know this greate site is not about silver or gold memberships I can help people as "no status" as well as "platinum", But, you know, it feels good to be on higher level 
best regards,
David 'DNH' Nohejl
Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
|
|
|
|
|
Status is recalculated nightly. I've given things a kick - let me know if it hasn't updated status by tomorrow morning.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see any change.
David
Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
|
|
|
|
|
thanks! 
Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if it actually saves time and space, but do we really need to see our own names after each message thread in the Messages Submitted page? Do users change their names that often?
"For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) ^ Blog
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
Do users change their names that often?
Yes , I have Changed It tooo
-----------------------------
"I Think this Will Help"
-----------------------------
Alok Gupta
visit me at http://www.thisisalok.tk
|
|
|
|
|
RajMVP[^] posted 5 "code snippets". could some Editor have a look at this? Thanks 
P.S. CP is running smoothly. So you see we don#t *always* complain 
we are here to help each other get through this thing, whatever it is Vonnegut jr.
boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. The article has been removed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
How much would it cost you guys, to create a different department for each of those two dev env's? I mean, they are not quite the same, neither are they alike... so what's the point on keeping them together?
A simple lightning-fast solution would be that on the 'new thread' page, there could be a couple of 'options' for each of 'previous to .Net' and '.Net itself', maybe defaulted to '.Net itself', and users could specify it on the 'thread's title'... it'd make the life of those of us who are here just to help much much easier...
Thanks for listening to me.
Pablo.ar
|
|
|
|
|
We're actually trying to avoid VB6 content, and have the VB/VB.NET combination in the forums mainly to cater to those having issues moving from VB6 to VB.NET.
If it turns out there's a pressing need for VB6 support forums and even VB6 article sections then we'll do it, but we'd prefer to leave VB6 to the many sites who have covered this topic sufficiently and move forward with VB.NET
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
Please _think_ about the following:
How many ad impressions would you loose when you disable ad cycling?
Occasional timeouts when following a link are bearable, but getting thrown out IN THE MIDDLE OF NOTHING is becoming so annoying I consider to go cold turkey on CP*. It makes me angry. I am shouting at the site, I am shouting at you. I am thinking about enabling the ad filter. It is that ugly.
I understand that you have no immediate solution. But we DO need fixes and workarounds for the time being. Currently, when I'm thrown out, I can't hit refresh, I can't hit "back". Even clicking "Stop" just after the page did load correctly does not help.
A concerned reader.
Technical Part:
I get FetchAdd errors very frequently if I
1. have a window open for a while, maybe in background
2. Click on a message board link (message veiw set to
The error is: URL "http://www.codeproject.com/info/error500.asp?500;http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/fetchAd.asp", and HTTP/1.1 500 Server Error.
It seems more prominent through a "long" wire (slower connection, additional proxy).
Update: ran without problems through the entire evening, from my home connection. That's weird.
*) maybe this *does* solve the server load problem
we are here to help each other get through this thing, whatever it is Vonnegut jr.
boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Peter,
I'm spending the morning trying to coax the system into spitting out an error from the ad page. If it happens, and it hijacks the entire page, the ad cycling is gone until I can find a solution.
This frustrates me as much as everyone else.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I've been running trouble free throughout the entire day. Yet, yesterday was hell, and I'm afraid it will reoccur.
When it happens again, is there any information that might help you?
I know quite well how frustrating it is if you can't reproduce a problem. I'm still optimistic that it's simple once you get the right piece of information.
we are here to help each other get through this thing, whatever it is Vonnegut jr.
boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen
|
|
|
|
|
The problem simply caused by heavy load. I think things have sorted themselves out now, but thanks for the offer (and your patience)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
This is just a minor suggestion, but would it be possible to fix the ad server so it does not continually throw out those annoying 500 errors.
Thanks.
"You're obviously a superstar." - Christian Graus about me - 12 Feb '03
"Obviously ??? You're definitely a superstar!!!" mYkel - 21 Jun '04
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
I was just going to re-suggest that very thing.
In fact I suggested it about two weeks ago and got voted down here for some inexplicable reason, maybe it was my "tone".;)
|
|
|
|
|
John Cardinal wrote:
I suggested it about two weeks ago and got voted down here for some inexplicable reason
Maybe server itself voted you down. These beasts are unpredictible these days
Lt. John Bergin: We're going to miss the good old days.
Detective Del Spooner: What good old days?
Lt. John Bergin: When people were killed by other people.
(I, robot)
Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
|
|
|
|
|
I've got error checking all over the place, custom error pages, exception handling, even on error resume next's splattered liberally.
Let me know if the problem persists. It's one of those cases where what you would expect to be happening isn't what's actually happening. It's frustrating for everyone.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
Let me know if the problem persists.
Huh? It's been going on sporadically for many weeks, perhaps months - I haven't been keeping track. I have been trying to correlate it to something but haven't had much success. It happens with equal frequency no matter what conditions I can detect prevail. I thought at first it was a load problem, but it doesn't matter whether there are 1600 or 6000 users connected. I check to see if my connection is poor, but other very busy sites respond without error. I haven't yet tried using tracert again, as we all did before when the NSP was having routing problems, but I will and if there's a pattern I'll pass it on. Predictably, the site is working perfectly this morning so it would be an exercise in futility today. Yesterday, though, it took so many tries to post a single reply that I gave up and got something productive accomplished instead. Hmmmm... Maybe I'm on to something here...
It must be rather frustrating for you, like spending all day tuning a car to running perfection only to find that it won't start in the morning.
"If it's Snowbird season, why can't we shoot them?" - Overheard in a bar in Bullhead City
|
|
|
|
|
I made some changes yesterday so if the ads die they (hopefully) won't take out the page they are in. If this change doesn't help then it's back to the drawing board
Roger Wright wrote:
It must be rather frustrating for you, like spending all day tuning a car to running perfection only to find that it won't start in the morning.
Pretty much 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
