|
I understand the server/service side will be accessible by any SOAP/XML clients but what I was saying was that clients would have to be developed for all platforms which makes it more complicated than just having one website with some DHTML. I still think it would be a good idea though.
I'm not late, I'm just not as early as I could have been.
MSN Messenger address: jonathann4@hotmail.com feel free to chat!
|
|
|
|
|
Nish [BusterBoy] wrote:
p.s. If I get good enough at web services, I can help out too...
Sounds like your idea is a perfect thing to learn from.
Give it a go Nish, you can write a series of articles on its development. (Just make sure that all the clients have to display CP's ads otherwise Chris will start losing money)
Michael
|
|
|
|
|
For some mysterious reason this article did not appear in the last-10 updates box on the front page and I almost missed it. Luckily an anonymous person posted on the article forum and thus I saw it in the question-time box and came here. But it still puzzles me as to why it did not come in the last-10 updates list
Nish
I am the Keyboard Smasher
|
|
|
|
|
are you watching the MFC page, not the C# page?
-c
Ah, but a programmer's reach should exceed his grasp, or what are late nights for?
Smaller Animals Software, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote:
are you watching the MFC page, not the C# page?
Neither. I have the All-Topics setting
Nish
I am the Keyboard Smasher
|
|
|
|
|
Count the number of articles posted on the 28th, and count the number of slots available in the 'last 10 posted'. (articles are ordered alphabetically in the last, so some will drop off)
Also: I sent you an email saying your article had been posted, so I'm surprised you say you were unaware of it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
Also: I sent you an email saying your article had been posted, so I'm surprised you say you were unaware of it.
I am not surprised at all Chris. I never got that email. My mail server has been behaving weird for the last 2-3 days
I wonder why you didn't get a bounce.
Chris Maunder wrote:
(articles are ordered alphabetically in the last, so some will drop off)
Ah! So that explains it. Thanks Chris.
Next time someone asks this same question, I'll answer it for him, freeing you of the ordeal
I also like it when new CPians actually think I am part of the CP staff [I use the word "we" when saying stuff like "we'll update it when we next have time"]
Regards
Nish
I am the Keyboard Smasher
|
|
|
|
|
What happened to the printer friendly link for the articles? It seems to be missing.
- Matt Newman / Anti-Linux Activist
-Sonork ID: 100.11179:BestSnowman
†
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like it was moved into that little box at the end, along with "send to a friend".
And if words were wisdom, I'd be talking even more. The Offspring, I Choose
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks
I was lookin for it too...
Nish
I am the Keyboard Smasher
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't even look there because I thought it was an Ad LOL. Thanks for pointing it out!
- Matt Newman / Anti-Linux Activist
-Sonork ID: 100.11179:BestSnowman
†
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. was looking for it
<centre>
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do, and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." - General George S. Patton Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
Can we have a box which shows when the last post on any forum on CP was made.
Like "Last post :- Michael Martin - Lounge - 6 minutes ago"
The good thing about this is if CP is quiet for 45 minutes, then we know it is indeed quiet.
I have noticed that there are extreme lull periods
Or perhaps this :-
suggestion (2)
Have a box that says
"14 posts & 1 new article in the last hour"
Thus we can see how active CP is...
Regards
Nish
I am the Keyboard Smasher
|
|
|
|
|
Look at the 'Question Time' box. Now hover your mouse over each entry. Do the same with the lounge.
I'm guessing that if there was a big signn on the front page saying 'all's quiet' then it would stay quiet, whereas if we had a sign saying 'things are going off' then it would stay busy. Having lists like this (and similarly: most viewed article, most popular thread etc) are all self perpetuating and don't (IMO) add value.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I get you Chris.
If we have an idle time counter, people might the think let it stay idle or they think like, lets see how far this'll go
But I must say the strain will be too much for me and I'll restrict the idle time to at most 3 minutes if I can help it .
Nish
I am the Keyboard Smasher
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
When someone submits something to submit@codeproject it would be nice if an automatic reply is sent :-
"Thanks for your submission. When we get around to editing it, it shall be posted. Regards, CP team"
or something like that so that the sender knows that his email has been received.
Regards
Nish
I am the Keyboard Smasher
|
|
|
|
|
If Outlook wasn't so lame I'd do it. As it is it's all done the old fashioned way.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
I'm sure you've probably heard this request a million times over but have you ever considered including a spell checker for either the Message Boards or as part of the submission wizard? Just curious.
Nick Parker
|
|
|
|
|
I'd love to - just need to find a handy, free, low impact spell checker component that works with ASP.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Wasn't there a fellow on here that did just that...?
"An expert is someone who has made all the mistakes in his or her field" - Niels Bohr
|
|
|
|
|
how about this?
1. only members can rate
2. you can only rate a given article once, and you can't rate your own articles.
3. there is a field to enter a (required?) comment when you place your rating
4. you can look back over the ratings and see the comments and (maybe?) who gave them
-c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc.
You're the icing - on the cake - on the table - at my wake. Modest Mouse
|
|
|
|
|
Interested ideas. A few problems that I forsee,
>1. only members can rate
Not hard to generate multiple accounts.
>2. you can only rate a given article once, and you can't rate your own articles.
How would you keep track of this? Cookies aren't much use, storing this info in a database would use up a lot of space.
>3. there is a field to enter a (required?) comment when you place your rating
I think we'd end up with a lot of "ewiorir0ri", "dsdkjakja", "yquwyqu" comments.
Michael
|
|
|
|
|
ok.
1. only members who have posted articles can rate.
2. i don't know. that's a back end issue. i'm talking about features not implementation
3. yep, with the loser's name right next to it.
or...
4. allow authors to opt-out of ratings.
-c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc.
You're the icing - on the cake - on the table - at my wake. Modest Mouse
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote:
allow authors to opt-out of ratings.
sounds good to me.
At least I wont see red every time some jerk gives me a 1 without even a goddamn comment.
Nish
I am looking for a free racing game. Old style racing game without any complicated 3D stuff. Around 4 MB download. If anyone has such a game, please inform me.
|
|
|
|
|
Nish, I thought you'd gotten use to it. You know from the written feedback that people respect your articles and your technical knowledge. As long as just one person got something out of your article what does it matter if 1000 people give you a 1 rating.
Michael
|
|
|
|