|
Just wondering what is the architecture of Codeproject website? I mean what technology stack, number of servers etc. Any ideas?
Kind regards,
Santosh
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn wrote: Aboot Us[^] page
Was that spelling error done on purpose, to make it seem like a Canadian was speaking?
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
It's actually only Canadians with recent Scottish lineage that pronounce it that way.
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
The America I believe in has always understood that natural harmony is only one meal away from monkey burgers. [Stan Shannon]
GOOD DAY FOR: Bean counters, as the Australian Taxation Office said that prostitutes and strippers could claim tax deductions for adult toys and sexy lingerie. [Associated Press]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I live on the west coast and have been all over Canada from Quebec west and have never in my entire life heard a single Canadian say "aboot" so either it's strictly an east coast thing or an urban legend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm...it appears she's from Nova Scotia or back east anyway so that must explain where this is coming from.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow... are all those CP servers?
-- modified at 17:31 Saturday 27th May, 2006
Nevermind... totally stupid question
|
|
|
|
|
I cant use modify when i click button i see that i dont have name and when click button i see you are currently logged i loggin-out and then back and also i delete all cookies and anything but again i see this error
whitesky
|
|
|
|
|
when i try, i get this message:
You are currently logged in as: Chris Losinger <my email addr>
You are trying to post as: C<sup>hris</sup> L<sup>osinger</sup> <my email addr>
The problem:
"C<sup>hris</sup> L<sup>osinger</sup>" has been registered by someone else. You cannot post using a name that someone else has registered.
---
logging-out and then back in didn't fix it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would that be too much to ask for?
|
|
|
|
|
One thread starts mid stream at the top of the soapbox ahead of any new threads, then the start of the thread is positioned in the correct place.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question."
--Charles Babbage (1791-1871)
My: Website | Blog
|
|
|
|
|
Same behaviour in "Web Development"
**edit** Not any more **edit**
-- modified at 9:00 Friday 19th May, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't it be better to separate those two from each other? Besides some common syntax they are really totally different and posters seem alyways to forget to also post which one they are referring to.
|
|
|
|
|
I would say get rid of the classic VB stuff altogether.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question."
--Charles Babbage (1791-1871)
My: Website | Blog
|
|
|
|
|
Colin Angus Mackay wrote: get rid of the classic VB
hooray
|
|
|
|
|
With classic you mean non .Net Visual Basic?
If there would be no classic VB forum the problem would be they would nevertheless post in the VB.Net forum... .
So the 'Classic VB' forum should be there but treated as a garbage bin
|
|
|
|
|
There'll be appliction written using classic VB for decades to come - Why get rid for a forum for it? If don't like VB so my solution is to simply not look in the VB thread. I think the seperation would be a good idead as has been done with C++.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Hewitt wrote: If don't like VB so my solution is to simply not look in the VB thread.
Thats exactly the reason why I want them separated
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Hewitt wrote: simply not look in the VB thread
That's what he wants to do, but the problem with it is that the users don't mention if it is about VB or VB.NET so you first have to read (or start reading) before you know you should not read it ...
|
|
|
|