|
And if javascript is disabled? (Also shog9 has something that does 1 better, deletes without going anywhere
Brad
Australian
- Captain See Sharp on "Religion"
any half intelligent person can come to the conclusion that pink unicorns do not exist.
|
|
|
|
|
Here ya go:
In-place Delete 1.0 - AJAX-style post delete
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
|
|
|
|
|
Hey would you be able to make a link to the CP stuff from your site's home page?
Brad
Australian
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Eh, sure, why not. Though i'll hold you responsible if it ends up making the page less pointless.
Enjoy.
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks
(BTW is there a way to backup the sigs in CPHog, also are you thinking of making an ie7 version?)
Brad
Australian
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Bradml wrote: (BTW is there a way to backup the sigs in CPHog, also are you thinking of making an ie7 version?)
You can go to about:config, filter by cphog, find the Signatures entry, and manually copy them out. 
Making that easier is on the list for v2.0...
As for IE7... it's possible. But not very likely. A while back, John Fisher wrote up an IE6 version, so if he (or anyone else) feels like updating it to take advantage of IE7 then they're welcome to it. Personally, i really don't have the motivation to do much for IE that i don't actually have to.
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
|
|
|
|
|
Shog9 wrote: You can go to about:config, filter by cphog, find the Signatures entry, and manually copy them out.
Glad you are so on top of things....
Shog9 wrote: it's possible. But not very likely.
I'm no expert with the whole "Active Script Insertion" thing (Brad's facts #3433e3 I just made that term up) but isn't most of the CPHog stuff stored on the CP servers anyway? So wouldn't this just mean checking it is IE compatible and inserting it?
Brad
Australian
- Captain See Sharp on "Religion"
any half intelligent person can come to the conclusion that pink unicorns do not exist.
|
|
|
|
|
Bradml wrote: So wouldn't this just mean checking it is IE compatible and inserting it?
Yup.
That said, i know the WYSIWYG stuff isn't cross-browser. Some of the event-handling isn't either, though it could be (and will be...). The code that actually queries the DOM in order to add controls, extract messages from server responses, etc... That's likely to have some problems. CPhog relies heavily on Mozilla's XPath support in order to accomplish this in something approaching a reasonable amount of time; if IE7's document.evaluate() support isn't quite up to snuff, then things will break badly.
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
|
|
|
|
|
And people wonder why I complain so much about the w3c.....
Anyway I can see that is a problem. CP isn't valid XHTML is it?
Brad
Australian
- Captain See Sharp on "Religion"
any half intelligent person can come to the conclusion that pink unicorns do not exist.
|
|
|
|
|
Bradml wrote: CP isn't valid XHTML is it?
Nope. That would make things a whole lot easier...
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
|
|
|
|
|
As much as people whine, Xml based interfaces are going to be the future applications, Desktop or Web. I am drafting a few standards now and am just going to get web developers suggestions soon but, combined with a very well regulated scripting language, XML interfaces are fantastic.
Brad
Australian
- Captain See Sharp on "Religion"
any half intelligent person can come to the conclusion that pink unicorns do not exist.
|
|
|
|
|
I've added javascript feeds from http://www.codeproject.com/info/includelatest.asp
on my site at http://manageweb.info/sharique/index.php?q=node/8
I wish it could be more cutomizable and I can get more articles.
Can anybody link for similar things, so I can add more stuff on my site.
Thanks
Sharique A. Farooqui
C++/C# developer , IT Consultant
|
|
|
|
|
If you click on an MVP icon for an author it goes to the protectors description rather than the MVP description.
See Marc's article[^] for an example.
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't voting on once own aticle be disallowed as voting on once own messages is disallowed? I accidentally voted on my own article. I was surprised to find that it worked.
Speaking of voting it will be great if it is possible for a user to change his vote.
|
|
|
|
|
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote: I voted accidentally on my own article.
|
|
|
|
|
Luckily it was a 5
Surprisingly, I found it out when it stated in the voting area "you voted 5 on this article". You are welcome to vote 1 to compensate.
|
|
|
|
|
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote: You are welcome to vote 1 to compensate.
I'm sure it was an excellent article, well deserving of the rating you gave it. 
|
|
|
|
|
In democratic system, a candidate can vote himself . 
|
|
|
|
|
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote: I accidentally
Funny, how every time this topic is brought up, there's an accidental vote involved...
Speaking for myself, i suspect i'm a far better judge of the quality of my articles than anyone else is. Not that you can trust me to be honest about it when voting, but i say it's still worth the risk...
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think I am a better judge of teh quality of my articles, my articles which I considered crappy got very high rating and the articles which I considered good got low rating.
Is it difficult to write a GM script that can protect you?.
|
|
|
|
|
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote: my articles which I considered crappy got very high rating and the articles which I considered good got low rating.
Exactly. Just think of all those people who got it wrong. If only they'd had your vote to guide them...
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote: Is it difficult to write a GM script that can protect you?.
No. Here's a start (known bug: will only work for the first author on multi-author articles):
var authorLink = XPathNode(document, "//table[@class='ArticleHeader']//a[starts-with(@href, '/script/Articles/list_articles.asp')]");
var userLink = XPathNode(document, "//td[@class='userNavText']/a[starts-with(@href, '/script/profile/whos_who.asp')]");
if ( userLink && userLink.href.match(/id=(\d*)/) )
{
var userId = RegExp.$1;
if ( authorLink && authorLink.href.match(/id=(\d*)/) && userId == RegExp.$1 )
{
var voting = XPathNode(document, "//td[@class='ArticlePane']/form/table/tbody/tr/td/table/tbody/tr/td[2]");
if ( voting )
voting.parentNode.removeChild(voting);
}
}(Definition for XPathNode() can be found in CPhog source... or replace with document.evaluate())
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
|
|
|
|
|
... that a new forum is required.
This week we have been so hectic with PHP related questions I have had to take 3 weeks of stress related leave.
The first of the assaults was this[^], a question so mighty its resolution that it could not be comprehended by the aids!
And then, as we were just recovering from the major casualties, we were dealt a hard and unruly blow by THIS!![^] The question that baffled the unbafflable, stumbled the unstumbleable, questioned the unquestionable! Me and my several tiny elves were left perplexed to the point of no recovery. We tried to answer but I fear it was not enough.
Another piece of evidence I would like to present is from a source with undeniable reliability, Google. A simple search for the term "PHP" returned 2,210,000,000 in a mere 0.04 secounds! (Imagine if it had been given more time!).
A similiar search for "ASP.net Microsoft Technology" showed a meer 4 results AND that took 0.38 secounds! (It had long enough).
I do believe that, due to the hardship we have faced in recent days, we require the assistance of a PHP forum.
Chris I have designed the forum for you. http://idontwanttouse.net/php_froum_design.JPG[^]
Brad
Australian
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Bradml wrote: Another piece of evidence I would like to present is from a source with undeniable reliability, Google. A simple search for the term "PHP" returned 2,210,000,000 in a mere 0.04 secounds! (Imagine if it had been given more time!).
A similiar search for "ASP.net Microsoft Technology" showed a meer 4 results AND that took 0.38 secounds! (It had long enough).
So it's also clear that we need to help ASP.net get up. PHP is already standing good & running dude, why need to worry about it?:->
|
|
|
|
|
Although ethically that would be the right thing to do, think about where the (easy) money is.
Brad
Australian
- Captain See Sharp on "Religion"
any half intelligent person can come to the conclusion that pink unicorns do not exist.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Beer | [beer]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)
