|
I assume you are talking about the homepage. Are you thinking that maybe having the "latest questions" and "lounge latest" appear in a dropdown or similar?
As to ASP.NET: We currently have a new version written in ASP.NET currently in alpha testing. Until now there's simply been no pressing need to move to ASP.NET but with increased load and new features we wish to add we've bitten the bullet and invested a lot in reworking the infrastruvture from scratch
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, the home page. What I was thinking is that the left side menu could be incorporated into two sections: the top menu and a bottom menu. So a section like "About the code project" could go on the bottom (footer) and some of the technology categories (for example "General C#, C# programming") could be a drop down from the top C# menu. That could free up some space for content.
For example, if you look at the new CNN.com site, you'll see a section menu across the top, static stuff on the botton. And the area in between is all news content links that change almost daily. If you look at cnn.com with the codeproject structure in mind, you might see what I mean.
The reason I'm suggesting it is because first time visitors would most likely use the left menus, along with everything else. But after making codeproject a part of your daily routine, you pull up the site and automatically look for new content (articles, lounge, questions, etc). After a while you forget to even look at the left side menu since it's static. Just my $.02, fwiw.
Thanks,
Bert
|
|
|
|
|
Suggestion: To show messages in tree like structure as shown in screen shot, the advantage of this would a person can see maximum message in a current view. i am unable to write the proper english of that, so i am attaching the screen shot.
http://www.stylusstudio.com/images/screenshots/fixml_schema_file_org.gif[^]
here when user cick the "+" sign then the link of submessages are visible else not.
Best Regards,
Mushq
Mushtaque Ahmed Nizamani
Software Engineer
Ultimus Pakistan
"English is my second language, so please don't mind if i do some grammatical or spelling mistakes in my messages."
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried the "Thread View"? - in the combobox in the orange bar on top of these messages.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanxs
Best Regards,
Mushq
Mushtaque Ahmed Nizamani
Software Engineer
Ultimus Pakistan
"English is my second language, so please don't mind if i do some grammatical or spelling mistakes in my messages."
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Hans,
I was not aware of the feature - thanks. Thread View still lacks the 'cleanness' of the tree view (IMHO).
Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
One thing that's small but always annoying and occurs almost daily is that sometimes I'll receive an email notification of a reply to my post in a large thread with levels and levels of posts. When I click on it I'll get to that persons reply but because my post they are responding to is one or more pages up it's nearly impossible to know which of my posts in the thread is being replied to other than context or if they quote a bit.
There are two links in the bottom, one for going to the start of the thread, the original post, and another for viewing the thread separately (which I can't see the use of at all), perhaps if there was a link that went to the message they were directly replying to?
"I don't want more choice. I just want better things!" - Edina Monsoon
|
|
|
|
|
that would be called the "Parent" link then ?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't care what they call it as long as they add it
"I don't want more choice. I just want better things!" - Edina Monsoon
|
|
|
|
|
I would call it the "Apropos" link.....but that might be confusing to non-englishers(hey, Shakespeare did it!)....but definitely a good, useful idea.
FG
I am who I am because of who everyone around me is.
|
|
|
|
|
flyingnome wrote: "Apropos" link.....but that might be confusing to non-englishers
Stealing from the French ?
|
|
|
|
|
est-ce que c'est piquer, si c'est ma langue maternelle?
I would say more along the lines of....assimilation.....or "open source" language use..
I am who I am because of who everyone around me is.
|
|
|
|
|
You might choose to use two words then and top it of with a classy little accent.
But that would reduce the probability it getting accepted I guess...
|
|
|
|
|
English doesn't borrow from other languages. English follows other languages down dark alleys, knocks them over and goes through their pockets for loose grammar.
--
You have to explain to them [VB coders] what you mean by "typed". their first response is likely to be something like, "Of course my code is typed. Do you think i magically project it onto the screen with the power of my mind?" --- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
|
|
|
|
|
And then there is American English...
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to have an option to retract a vote? If I accidentally click 1 instead of 5, it would be nice to be able to retract the dodgy vote and revote.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
I absolutely need this option having just voted 1 to your post!!!
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah - just leave it at 1.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
As you can see, I was able to retract it
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - we're adding this
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Cool.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to see something like that. There have been times of voting down an article, then the author going and making major improvements, I'd like to vote it up...
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
what circumstances we are supposed to use one or the other? Are they actually the same thing? Can we just get a single link that says inappropriate or something because from what I gather a lot of other people don't know whether to click on them or not for a lot of different scenarios.
"I don't want more choice. I just want better things!" - Edina Monsoon
|
|
|
|
|
Spam would be like UCE right (Unsolicited Commercial Advertising).
When someone is harassing others using obscene words or like that, we can use 'Abuse' option.
Abuse option is more powerful than Spam option. Of course, they also have a distinct line of demarcation and boundary between them. Isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
The (currently) have the same affect, but allow me to see the difference in the amount of spam vs abusive messages
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|