|
Hi all,
I have noticed that the icons/logos at "CodeProject stuff" don't have the same quality of the logo used at the CP site (icon lighted background, font, "Your dev resource" slogan).
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
Added to TODO
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Would it also be possible to get a few images in the "CodeProject Stuff" of a high quality image of the Bob alien? I have had numerous school projects where I included Bob, but it had terrible resolution/image quality when I attempted to remove the orangish background for say a powerpoint presentation.
Regards,
Thomas Stockwell
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
Visit my Blog
|
|
|
|
|
I've added a clean logo here [^] that may help.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I sent an article to CodeProject.Com yesterday. although the article is not completed yet but I expected to see my article in http://www.codeproject.com/KB/vb/[^] but I couldnt find my article there. the article is visible only for me and no one else can read it. does it mean that my article is not accepted by the editors?
A.E.Kubanani
|
|
|
|
|
If your article has not been completed, you won't see it. Please - don't add unfinished articles to the site. There are people who take the time to read through articles and it makes their jobs harder if they have to wade through unfinished articles.
|
|
|
|
|
I do appreciate for your answer
My article is incomplete technically. that's true.Dear friend, I do not like to bother you in CodeProject. I feel it just takes about 5 minutes to be edited with editors not experts. but two suggestions:
1.If you answered me : "we can not accept such an article" this was more helpfull for me because if so I knew what to do next. I wish you had a team that checkes the articles only for being acceptable or not and answers instantly.
2.Editing articles on CodeProject website is time consuming and difficult.why dont you develop a free software for editing articles in CodeProject format?
Using such software user logs on to the website and easily edits his/her articles.
A.E.Kubanani
|
|
|
|
|
A.E.K wrote: 2.Editing articles on CodeProject website is time consuming and difficult.why dont you develop a free software for editing articles in CodeProject format?
Using such software user logs on to the website and easily edits his/her articles.
There are Code Project templates available for you to use offline. Read the submission guidelines[^] page to find out where.
A.E.K wrote: 1.If you answered me : "we can not accept such an article" this was more helpfull for me because if so I knew what to do next. I wish you had a team that checkes the articles only for being acceptable or not and answers instantly.
That would be a huge undertaking, especially for a primarily volunteer run site. Remember, Code Project has very few full time staff, and relies on volunteers to help out. These volunteers cannot dedicate 100% of their time to doing this because they normally have jobs to help pay the bills.
Gold Members of the site do take a look at unapproved articles and, if the article is almost there, will generally offer advice or critique. In the case where it looks like the article is unpublishable because it's just the template or the code is missing, the article will be reported for deletion.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot
Good Job!
A.E.Kubanani
|
|
|
|
|
A.E.K wrote: Editing articles on CodeProject website is time consuming
Agreed, but...
A.E.K wrote: why dont you develop a free software for editing articles in CodeProject format?
There's nothing special about CodeProject's "format" - it's called HTML - it's a standard - look it up.
Why don't you just use a local editor to write your articles, and then copy/paste the text into the article editor. That's what I do - it usually takes me a week or two to write and article, but just a couple of minutes to post it.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I would suggest that you only post finished articles, and draft the articles on your own computer. Otherwise, they may not suvive the moderation.
Regards,
Thomas Stockwell
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
Visit my Blog
|
|
|
|
|
It is unpublished, and posting an incomplete article might not get a warm welcome.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
I can guarantee it won't get a warm welcome. "Might" doesn't even enter into the equation...
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. "Might" just there depending on how incomplete the article is. If it looks like an article template, then that's a for sure cold welcome. Otherwise, if he's 90% complete, there's a chance it might be looked past. Depends all on the article content.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
A.E.K wrote: I sent an article to CodeProject.Com yesterday
Articles sent via email to submit (at) codeproject may take a while depending upon the backlog of work on the CP Editors. Your best bet would be to contact webmaster (at) codeproject.com after at least giving them a week's time.
You may also like to submit the article through the automated article engine but be warned that through this mode, your content would be published almost immediately and hence the onus of content and presentation lies wholly on you. Hence you ought to double and triple check the content before letting it go live.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players.
They have their exits and their entrances;
And one man in his time plays many parts... --William Shakespeare
|
|
|
|
|
No, the best bet is to contact submit@codeproject.com to see how things are going.
Articles are usually posted within 1-2 business days.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
...maybe it's just me, but every time I see the 'i' icon beside the 'Monthly Competition' in the 'Announcements' section, it makes me think that a page errored out in an IFrame or something.
...maybe change it to something else? Just a thought 
|
|
|
|
|
Any ideas on what we should have? A pot of gold? A lucky 8 ball? A hanging-chad?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
How about a little trophy? A little base with a cup on it, or a pair of golden curly braces or something?
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's great! May we use it? Unconditionally with a lifelong irrevocable and perpetual license valid in all jurisdictions...
Yeah, been dealing with laywers again. A little of my soul gets greyer each time...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I'm glad you like it
Please do use it unconditionally, with lifelong and perpetual license, valid in all jurisdictions.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I submitted my latest article on October 1. When I view my article Posted date at the top right says 1 October. However, if I log out and then view my article it says 30 September. The same thing happens with other articles too. When I am logged out posted date is less by one.
|
|
|
|
|
It's because when you are logged in all times are displayed using your timezone. When you are logged out they are displayed using the server's timezone.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When showing server time instead of local, would it be possible to indicate the timezone to avoid confusion?
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
