|
I'm Most Valuable Pete of the lounge.
|
|
|
|
|
IMO for this lounge one Pete is quite enough.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to see voting removed from the soapbox, only the ability to mark as abuse.
|
|
|
|
|
EliottA wrote: I'd like to see voting removed from the soapbox, only the ability to mark as abuse
I wouldn't. There are times when it's nice to be able to tell someone you didn't: like/agree with/approve of his message without necessarily considering it a site-abusive post and wanting it removed.
Even more importantly, it's nice to be able to high-five someone when they have said something brilliant.
Jon
Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
|
|
|
|
|
|
An your point is?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
That Chris might want to know?
|
|
|
|
|
China and Russia websites are known for plagiarism.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
Ah I love it, the article writer used CP in the graphic and there is it right in your face. Interestingly my net nazi blocks the china site but not the RU one!
Yes Chris should be given the opportunity to nail these guys, I just wanted to check if the writer had published on multiple sites.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I just modified a post and everything worked fine afterwards.
Hope this means it's fixed.
If so, well done to whoever done it.
[Mod]
Send back my flower, you pollen snaffling hamsters, you!
It's at it again!
[/Mod]
Henry Minute
If you open a can of worms, any viable solution *MUST* involve a larger can.
modified on Friday, January 16, 2009 11:17 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, still broken for me. I got it in the Lounge again...
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Groan!
Yeah it's back for me again. Yesterday must have been a fluke.
Henry Minute
If you open a can of worms, any viable solution *MUST* involve a larger can.
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] article seems to have been live since at least last April, but it's in the approval queue. Is this a bug or am I missing something about the approval process?
|
|
|
|
|
It might have been a caching remant you saw in the approval queue. It's not there now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to submit an article, in ASM, but I don't know which forum, chapter, area, ... to go to.
I have two ideas in mind, one is a solution for the GLAT trivial question #17, the other is based on permutation.
the "whatever it takes" attitude
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for the slow reply
The rule of thumb is to post the article in the correct Topic section. Maybe 'General Programming / Algorithms and Recipes'?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Giving me the empty message list, that is.
Same situation.
1. make post
2. hit edit on post
3. make edit and repost.
4. Change page
No messages!
Henry Minute
If you open a can of worms, any viable solution *MUST* involve a larger can.
|
|
|
|
|
Still looking. Sorry this is taking so long
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to subscribe to an entire forum, so I get an email notification when a new thread is created, not necessarily all replies to it just on a new thread.
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
This is our TODO list.
Our only worry is email volume. As it is the servers are straining.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't think of that, well I'm glad to hear it's in the works!
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Our only worry is email volume.
Can you put a limit on the number of emails per day per forum?
|
|
|
|
|
That's easy. Choosing where to draw the line isn't.
We can't just say "We'll only send 10,000 emails an hour, first in, best dressed".
There are options, though, such as saying you only get an email if you've visited that forum in the last N months.
Or I could sell a kidney and just buy a bunch of servers and some serious bandwidth. At least that wouldn't require as much debugging.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant limit per person per forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Just include a different token in each individual mail, and request the token be returned before you send the next mail. That will dramatically reduce the workload.
|
|
|
|