|
You're correct. He's too much of an idiot that we can spot him in a flash. His extremely poor vocabulary and terrible posts give it away, no matter what he hides behind or how long of a break he takes before coming back here.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
He's not actually broken any rules yet. At least not with this current login he's using.
I'm not going to kick someone just because he's posting drivel. If I did that the place would be very quiet
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: He's not actually broken any rules yet. At least not with this current login he's using.
Right, then. I'll ping you the moment this troll violates any of the rules.
Chris Maunder wrote: I'm not going to kick someone just because he's posting drivel. If I did that the place would be very quiet
Yes, it would be very quiet without Dalek Dave.
Just kidding Dalek, just kidding.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
I have my hoards of Evil Daleks ready to descend and wreak havoc upon you, oh no, wait, er... you're right!
Well, it is not always drivel, but I must admit, there is a bit from time to time.
------------------------------------
"I'm going to walk around a field dangling my keys on a bit of string until I hear whistling noises. "
Steve Harris 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: If I did that the place would be very quiet
Too much silence like a grave without such mischevious cats would spoil some occasional fun too.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I noticed that the advanced search doesn't work anymore in Firefox and NoScript addon. I use the advanced search to limit search results to the last month. Even if you allow JavaScript from Codeproject the advanced search won't show up, you also need to allow other websites (microsoft.com). Would be nice if Codeproject website would work without 3rd party scripts.
Cheers, Moak
|
|
|
|
|
... how to answer a question, why not an article/post on "How to evaluate an article"?!
Now we've got people giving praise to code dumps where the "discussion" of the code/concepts wouldn't fill a sticky note.
|
|
|
|
|
We'll put something together in the moderation box in new articles.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
As we roll into yet another year, I would like to call your attention to my favorite unimplemented feature, showing downloads on member's article page.
I know what you're thinking: But Hans, that will take massive amounts of DB processing, and we simply can't spare the cycles on any of our 400 servers".
Well, I think the recent server problems have proved that you can inflict excruciating pain on CP members, and not have to worry about open rebellion.
So how about it? Hit the local LCBO, crank up the scripts and the Rammstein tunes, and spend the evening not caring much about anything.
|
|
|
|
|
That was on a todo list but disappeared some time ago
|
|
|
|
|
I vote for not fixing what ain't broke, until we have fixed what is broke. Accepting a temporary server problems is not the same thing as volunteering for a permanent slowdown.
Jon
'When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.' ~ Montesquieu
Soap Box 1.0: the first, the original, reborn troll-less
|
|
|
|
|
There's a difference between problems caused by releasing a system that causes a few hours discomfort, and something that will chew up a month of CPU time (at our latest guess).
But regardless: your point is that having download counts would not only be nice for everyone in general, it would be valuable to authors specifically.
In a week or so I'll start the ball rolling on getting this sorted out. If I have to buy a dedicated machine to do this then so be it. Processing will take a long, long time, but I guess even if we start releasing figures bit by bit it's something.
(and I just discovered an old cache of Rammstein classics on my laptop. I'm good to go.)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
You've lost me there. Either I missed a joke sign somewhere, or I am puzzled how one or two download counters (one for the downloading person, one for the article) can cause you to consider a new machine, where we already have an article view counter and probably many other counters too.
Would some delay be helpful (a log file and some batch processing)?
Luc Pattyn
I only read code that is properly indented, and rendered in a non-proportional font; hint: use PRE tags in forum messages
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
|
|
|
|
|
My suspicion is that it's chewing through a decade of log files to create the initial numbers is what is going to devour a month of CPU time, not serving the results up and incrementing the total afterwards.
The latest nation. Procrastination.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe we can live with a "xxx downloads since 01-JAN-2009" message, something similar (but less precise) happened when the vote histograms got introduced ("Voting distribution. Recent data only").
Luc Pattyn
I only read code that is properly indented, and rendered in a non-proportional font; hint: use PRE tags in forum messages
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
|
|
|
|
|
We can certainly do this, but what value will it actually provide? In the end it's a random value for anything not posted since the system was turned on.
Up to you guys.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
If the implementation cost isn't prohibitive I'd prefer a tally going back to when CP was first turned on.
The latest nation. Procrastination.
|
|
|
|
|
The cost isn't an issue, but it will take time. We have an insane amount of data to chew through.
I personally prefer not to do this half-hearted.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe you can do a "SETI-at-home" kind of thing, and rig up a CP screensaver to crank on the database in the idle time. Or email a 1Mb chunk of the DB to each of the 6,500,000 members.
|
|
|
|
|
If cost only consisted of Dollars we'd all be using penguinware.
The latest nation. Procrastination.
|
|
|
|
|
How about this stepwise gathering of info:
1. create a download counter for every article (or every downloadable item?) and set it to zero on date X (say today) and start counting new download actions;
2. set date Y=X, and show "xxx downloads since Y" for every article.
3. then run whatever it takes to go backwards in time from Y by say 1 month; hence all numbers may change and become "yyy downloads since Y" where Y = Yprevious - 1 month
4. repeat step 3 (say once a week) until CP creation date is reached (or no one cares any more)
that way, with a little effort each week the data gets more and more aggregated without upsetting the infrastructure. And you can stop going backwards any time you like.
Luc Pattyn
I only read code that is properly indented, and rendered in a non-proportional font; hint: use PRE tags in forum messages
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
modified on Monday, October 12, 2009 12:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Love the counter idea. There would have to be some means to mark a download as the primary download, in the case where there is more than one zip.
|
|
|
|
|
I would love to see this feature also.
|
|
|
|
|
This is the survey in question.
#2 How do you like to find out about development products?
(1 is "like the most" and 5 is "like the least.")
#4 Which of these best help you make a buying decision?
(1 is "least helpful in making a decision" and 5 is "most helpful in making a decision.")
In #2, 1 is the best, and in #4, 1 is the worst. Is this the biggest flaw? Not even close. But this kind of 'direction change' is annoying and can trip up respondents.
Also, #6 has options for 1-3m and then jumps to 6-12m (there is no 3-6m).
Cheers,
Vikram. (Cracked not one CCC, but two!)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the feedback. We'll try and be more consistent with wording (and better proof readers) in the future.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|