|
No known change in the email system.
Maybe it was an unknown change.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Is there some way to remove the "Collapse" button and text from above PRE tags? I have several smallish PRE blocks and the "Collapse" button just adds clutter.
If not, then please add an option something like collapse="no" to the wish list.
|
|
|
|
|
We used to have it auto-select which blocks based on size. Personally I think anything less than 10 lines should be left alone. How does this sound?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
that sounds arbitrary.
anything that does not shrink by collapsing should not be collapsible, and anything that does should.
depending on style that could split at 3.
|
|
|
|
|
All design, eventually, can appear as an arbitrary decision.
The purpose of the 'collapse' is specifically to allow a reader to quickly shrink a large block of code that is interupting the flow of reading. a 3 line block of code does not, in my subjective opinion, constitute a block of code interupting the flow of reading.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Mine is working fine at 3. Example here[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Personally I think anything less than 10 lines should be left alone. How does this sound?
That sounds fine.
|
|
|
|
|
I've changed the system so that all PRE blocks get the "collapse" thing because I wanted to add a "Copy Code" link as well. I can have it add a "Copy Code" for all, and "collapse" for blocks less than 10 lines, but while I play around a little with it I also added a "decoration='none'" option that you can add to the end of a pre block.
I was thinking this could be decoration=none|collapse|copy|all
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
looks like some div adjustments were made in last 8-10 hours... before going to sleep all was fine. Right now, part of description of a question is shown along side of Title. It looks weird and difficult to read. Doesn't looks like intentional.
Can someone confirm and look into it?
P.S.: Cnrt+F5 done... IE 8
|
|
|
|
|
Same here. There is no line break after the subject of the question.
Firefox 3.6.6, Web 22
Update: Voting radio buttons have come over voting result box. Lot of things seem to have messed up.
..Go Green..
modified on Thursday, July 1, 2010 12:52 AM
|
|
|
|
|
I also got the same problem. I believe its a bug.
[UPDATE]
Tips and Tricks also having the same problem. Voting radio button is also distorted.
Arun Jacob
My Technical Blog : Code.NET
modified on Thursday, July 1, 2010 4:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Yes: just revised a question and noticed the same thing: makes it almost unreadable.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
|
|
|
|
|
In this question[^], it is particularly bad to look at.
"I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)
|
|
|
|
|
Uploaded a new CSS file. A ctrl-f5, or some patience, and the issue will be fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: or some patience
What is this patience you talk about?
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: What is this patience
It's a cards game, better known under the name "Solitaire". Why Maunder thinks, playing this game will solve the problem, is beyond me. But who am I to judge.
"I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: A ctrl-f5, or some patience
Patience I opt!
|
|
|
|
|
The little green triangle thingy next to the user name is nice. Putting all that stuff on a menu makes the top bar look cleaner.
|
|
|
|
|
This is really nice.
WWW, WCF, WWF, WPF, WFC .... WTF
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] question.
Firstly William Winner went to all the trouble of modifying the code snippet to make it readable, despite my having deleted the question before he did this.
On getting notification of Williams' updates, I went and ensured that it was deleted and lo and behold nearly an hour later I get an Email notifying me that Abhishek Sur had a solution for my problem, despite it being resolved some time ago. From the Email it would seem that he has a correct solution, but I can neither thank him nor up-vote either William or Abhishek.
I am slightly at a loss to understand quite what is happening here, although I suspect that 'cache' and 'Ctrl-F5' will feature predominantly in any response.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
Why do programmers often confuse Halloween and Christmas? - Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
Business Myths of the Geek #4 'What you think matters.'
|
|
|
|
|
I can see both question (with William's name as last editor) and Abhishek's answer. I was also able to click on the voting buttons on the answer. Are you sure it's deleted?
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: I can see both question (with William's name as last editor) and Abhishek's answer.
You have a reputation that allows you to see the deleted content.
You must have missed, look closely and you will find 'Status: Deleted' with delete highlighted in Yellow for both question and the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Sandeep Mewara wrote: look closely and you will find 'Status: Deleted'
OK, I give up, exactly where on the page am I supposed to see this?
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
For question, near Permalink & Improve Question.
For answer, near Posted username/time.
I just tried a Cntrl+F for Deleted in the webpage and that too show it. (IE8)
|
|
|
|
|
No, it still does not show in either place. I tried <Ctrl>F5 but that made no difference, then took a look at the source code and it's definitely not there. I also notice the layout is a bit messed up so I suspect some recent QA changes have caused the problem.
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|