|
Whacked.
Thanks for letting us know
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
codeproject forum should have one section where user can see his/her comments which they give on someone's question? same like 'M
YPOST' new section name as 'MYCOMMENT'
|
|
|
|
|
There is a link (called "Comments", surprisingly enough) on your profile page.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you give me the path where i display my posted comment ?
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/MemberComments.aspx?mid=4899288[^]
You can reach this link by going to your profile page (your name is on the top right corner of the screen, clicking it will take you to your profile page)
And there under your picture (which at the moment is image unavailable and just bob) you'll see a bunch of links with numbers indicating how many articles / tech blogs / messages / ... / comments you'v made.
Clicking on the text ('comments' in this case) will take you to a page displaying all your comments (the link above).
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Tom. You jumped in while I was getting some much-needed shuteye.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
I recently received an email from someone whose article I had commented on, but when I went to reply the article had been removed. I did a quick lookup to find the user and discovered that he or she had been a member of CodeProject for nearly six years, had no articles to their name, and only 25 messages, but had the status of Supporter (with halo). I just wonder what are the criteria for achieving this status?
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
|
|
|
|
|
IIRC in the old days you could pay a fee to support the site, and you were given a halo and the status "Supporter". Doubtless someone will correct me if I'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: YRC
WTFDTSF?
|
|
|
|
|
You Recall Correctly - he did say II.
|
|
|
|
|
aspdotnetdev wrote: WTFDTSF?
WTFDTSF?
|
|
|
|
|
ISF - What the "flip" does that stand for?
|
|
|
|
|
YTM.
|
|
|
|
|
Supporter status was given to those who purchased VS.NET and MSDN from us back in the good old days. WE've been meaning to deprecate this status for, oh, 5 years or so
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: WE've been meaning to deprecate this status
I'm a supporter of this decision.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, wait, if I could give you $25 to get a shiney icon on my profile, I totally would. Money making opportunity?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, at least you have deleted it from the member type page, even though the who who icon still links to it
Dave
Find Me On: Web| Facebook| Twitter| LinkedIn
CPRepWatcher now available as Packaged Chrome Extension, visit my articles for link.
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: even though the who who icon still links to it
That bloody owl is back again!
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
I thought maybe more of pigeon............whatever it is, it terrorises Bob!
Dave
Find Me On: Web| Facebook| Twitter| LinkedIn
CPRepWatcher now available as Packaged Chrome Extension, visit my articles for link.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know if this has already been said. Considering this is a programming site, I have the following two suggestions.
It seems like the "debate" points earned by a member in the programming zone is clubbed with the ones earned in the banter/rant zone. It would be convenient and useful if they are split into their own sub category. I feel people who aren't the regulars or are the lurkers (even the non member ones) will find it easy to consider answers given by people with "credentials", so let the rep points actually reflect this.
Also, going a step ahead, in every member's profile page, it would be helpful to have a list of domains/categories in which that member has answered the most and has earned high rep points.
|
|
|
|
|
Answering a question in a Programming Zone gives you Authority Points, a ramble or conversation point gives you a Debator Point.
That seems reasonable.
As you say this is a Programming Site, not the Statistical Department of Edinburgh University.
I can't see the benefits of over analysis, most 'droppers in' do not care who helps, those who are more permanent know who are the experts in their fields.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: Answering a question in a Programming Zone gives you Authority Points, a ramble or conversation point gives you a Debator Point.
That seems reasonable.
Oops! I overlooked that. Thanks.
Dalek Dave wrote: As you say this is a Programming Site, not the Statistical Department of Edinburgh University.
I can't see the benefits of over analysis, most 'droppers in' do not care who helps, those who are more permanent know who are the experts in their fields.
No, I feel it is still going to be helpful. I didn't know a lot of members existed till their name showed up in programming zone and I had to check on them.
(and THIS was supposed to be my thousandth post?!
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats on the 1000!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|