|
I really don't want to drag any users under the bus if my hypothesis isn't correct, but I'll give a couple links as reference to why I'm asking?
This is what I would expect a normal profile to look like. He answers a good number of questions and gets votes on a small percentage of those answers as expected.
Suspicious is what I would refer to this member as. Even though there are a couple of 1 votes thrown in there, he has amazing karma to receive multiple votes on pretty much every answer he provides. This just doesn't seem plausible to me.
I didn't keep track of a couple others like this that I found yesterday, I had to dig again to find this guy.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, he's just outright rude. I deleted a couple of his comments, but I don't have time to go through everything he's done.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
It's not the rudeness that I have issues with. I figure we're all adults and as such we're bound to run into people like that out there in life. I just found the up votes he gets on his posts and rather suspicious.
BTW. Thanks for taking the time.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
I did it because his profile claims he's "always professional". When you tell someone to go f*ck themselves, I think that's a pretty wide step away from "professional". He's a putz.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know. "Professional" athletes say that to each other all the time.
I'm in total agreement with you, BTW!
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Here[^] is one more. All his answers are voted, though I think I have seen a couple of good answers from him before. But all answers voted high makes me curious.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] chap.
Typical answer[^], I have deleted some but I'm getting bored.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
That's incredible - I don't think I've ever seen a negative Authorship score before
I guess his Authority is appropriate, though... 666
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems the emssage is getting through to him reasonably clearly by looking at the scores on his answers.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I just approved an entry in Tips & Tricks as I felt (but others may not) that the author had followed the rules correctly. This reminded me of a rant in the Lounge a few weeks ago when someone took exception to an article being accepted and asked "who the *** accepted this?". Do others think that our names should be added to the page somewhere to indicate who accepted the article and when?
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
|
|
|
|
|
I think this is a good idea and have added it to the TODO
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any reason why ASP.NET tag is default when searching through articles ?
I try to remove it, everything is working fine, but when i come back to site it coming back again as default.
Its quite annoying...
Adrian
Adrian Pasik
|
|
|
|
|
Is it not just a case of unchecking ASP.NET and then clicking the 'update filter' button?
|
|
|
|
|
When you visit the homepage there is a dropdown next to the tabs for Articles, messages etc. It might say "ASP.NET". You can change this. (Yes, it's unintuitive. I will fix )
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
At first I thought it must be April 1st when the Article in The Insider with the sub-title "This is not the code you are looking for" here[^] gave a '404 - File or directory not found' error, but then I checked my calendar and realized that it must be a hamster malfunction.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is we post links to items and sometimes the item gets removed between the time we send the newsletter and you read it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I realize that but thought that you folks might like to know about it.
It was also quite ironic, given the sub-title used.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
here[^] - posted this[^].
P O'H where are you?
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
|
|
|
|
|
Here and done. Thanks Richard.
|
|
|
|
|
Something to chew on:
Formatting broken in This article[^]
1f y0u c4n r34d 7h15 y0u r3411y n33d 70 g37 14!d
Gotta run; I've got people to do and things to see...
Don't tell my folks I'm a computer programmer - They think I'm a piano player in a cat house...
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed it a little. Sean will neaten it up later today.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
A little more lovin' givin
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Recently, the previewing the article doesn't work at all. It gives, after 4-5 minutes, some message that bug is reported and Administrator informed.
I have been using IE9 Beta, and it was working well. Few days ago, it was working, albeit a bit delayed "preview". Now, it doesn't preview it at all.
I installed Chrome, and tried to preview from there, but outcome is same. Thus, I believe the problem is at CodeProject.
|
|
|
|
|
How is it now for you?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|