|
Blocking IP addresses doesn't help. Life would be easier if it did.
Ignoring does, as does voting to remove their messages.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's proved over and over again that that doesn't help squat...
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach ----- Don't tell my folks I'm a computer programmer - They think I'm a piano player in a cat house... ----- Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo! ----- Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects - Will Rogers, 1924
|
|
|
|
|
Bending your knees. That helps squat.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Bending your knees. That helps squat.
Sure. It may also bring you down to the level of the trolls. Squat isn't the answer to everything.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
What about more than 1 member using the same IP (corporate IP), you would be banning them all.
What about dynamic IP's? He can just get a new IP and continue.
What if you ban his IP, he gets a new one and somebody else get's his banned IP (I know I know chances of that happening are very small but still)
Banning IP's has been discussed here over and over again and the outcome is always the same, it doesn't help.
|
|
|
|
|
So my I idea to ban the IP was bad...you win some, you lose some.
|
|
|
|
|
yep. vote for removal, otherwise ignore, do not reply, do not start a thread about the subject, don't even participate in one, and don't use the T word.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny J. wrote: so isn't it possible to use the log files and identify his correct identity
Yes it is, they can look at the actual IP address and all member aliases associated with this IP address. IMHO - banning the IP address would "help" solve the problem and would be a start in the right direction.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree to an extent, but I still believe that exposing his true identity would put a serious damper on his future activities...
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach ----- Don't tell my folks I'm a computer programmer - They think I'm a piano player in a cat house... ----- Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo! ----- Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects - Will Rogers, 1924
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny J. wrote: I still believe that exposing his true identity would put a serious damper on his future activities...
What if our little friend only has one identity? What would you expose?
POH makes a very, very good point in ignoring this type of behavior. Exposing this person only adds fuel to the fire. Ban the IP and move on with our lives.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: POH makes a very, very good point in ignoring this type of behavior
With 7.6 million users, I think it's quite impossible to get EVERYBODY to ignore it, I'm afraid...
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach ----- Don't tell my folks I'm a computer programmer - They think I'm a piano player in a cat house... ----- Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo! ----- Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects - Will Rogers, 1924
|
|
|
|
|
That's a breach of privacy and is not going to happen.
Besides: I can assure you it would not help.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Just an idea, and I disagree with you concerning whether or not it's going to help.
Got any better ideas?
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach ----- Don't tell my folks I'm a computer programmer - They think I'm a piano player in a cat house... ----- Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo! ----- Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects - Will Rogers, 1924
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny J. wrote: and I disagree with you concerning whether or not it's going to help.
It won't help because it is not a Sock Puppet account. He has never been a member before. I think maybe he is young(under-16) but I have never seen any evidence to suggest this is a Sock Puppet account, and I think you can infer from Chris saying that 'It wont help' that it definitely isn't.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: That's a breach of privacy and is not going to happen.
Good to hear that my sock-puppet accounts are not compromised.
|
|
|
|
|
All sock puppets, great and small...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Sock puppet accounts? Forgive me for my ignorance but what are they?
If God helps those who help themselves, don't you think we should do the same?
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts created by a regular that get used to "get a rise" out of others. For instance, creating an account that says that global warming is killing everything just to get a reaction out of fat_boy.
|
|
|
|
|
walterhevedeich wrote: Sock puppet accounts? Forgive me for my ignorance but what are they?
Uhm, you really never heard that expression before?
Here: Wikipedia-link[^]
"I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah. Really. Probably because even though we speak English in our country, we dont use that expression. Thanks for the link, and for educating me.
Ignorance of the ability brings disability.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't be so sure it's a sock puppet. Maunder's investigated these accusations before, and IIRC the result was always negative.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I already know your answer Chris but I feel compelled to ask this any how.
How far in the red is a member allowed to go before they explode on impact?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to change the location of an article I created a couple of months ago (MSEPX) from C++ utilities to Threading IPC which more exactly descibes the article.
However, the first attempt to create the article was aborted and deleted from Threading but now when I try to change the location the system says an error occurred because an article of the same name exists. It seems the original was simply marked as deleted and not replaceable by a new article.
What can I do (besides deleting the finished article and renaming it and resubmitting)? It would be nice to be simply able to change the location and re-save it.
|
|
|
|
|
|