|
With 7.8 million users, do you seriously think that 33 downloads of ALL your posted files is a lot?
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011 ----- Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach ----- Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo! ----- Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932
|
|
|
|
|
Small request Chris:
IF you do decide to add retrospective points, can they be added at the date the download was actually performed, and the rep graph be recalculated???
That would give a better picture of the development of the rep instead of one massive change on the date they are added...
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011 ----- Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach ----- Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo! ----- Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, this is how it will be done.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible the article name can be added to the event history e.g.
Object Associated File: Some Article Name
Shown in the same way when an article is upvoted.
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
|
I suggested that last week. Chris is away, so I doubt we'll see movement until he's gotten back from vacation.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Did he say when he'll be getten back?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not listening.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry to learn about your hearing loss.
Hope the healthy Aussie sun will help you get better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
No, I suggested that last week...
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3871564/Download-rep-suggestion.aspx[^]
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011 ----- Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach ----- Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo! ----- Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - we'll add those.
Please ignore the peanut gallery.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Please ignore the peanut gallery.
I take it that is a reference to the two knuckle scrapers above?
|
|
|
|
|
The article "The Basics of Task Parallelism via C#</" has a less than character in it. It has illuminated three issues regarding HTML encoding of article titles:
- The article title is not HTML encoded on the latest articles page.
- The article title is not HTML encoded in the page title of the article page (note: I mean the title between the TITLE tag in the HEAD tag).
- The article title is not HTML encoded when it is automatically inserted into a link to an article posted in a message (I had to modify the title above to HTML encode the less than character).
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - I've added this to the bug list.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Random example - this[^] one has it, this[^] one doesn't - the header at the top that says
A Technical Blog article. View entire blog here.
What is needed to include that automatically?
|
|
|
|
|
Some blog articles have the original source URL removed so there's nothing to display.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Presenting a French ad[^] to the Dutch speaking majority in Belgium is the surest way of not getting any business here. (The link seems to be to an English page, however it appeared as a French ad and hyperlink in the main ad TRHC of CP's home page).
This has happened once before, some years ago; when I reacted all went back to English, which is way better.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
This is an ad served from a third party system. I could wax lyrical about marketing people but I won't. I'll pass this on and hope for the best.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I think it is time to add "PHP" and "LAMP\WASP\WIMP\WISP" *See-Note-Below as article tags.
The CodeProject site provides article tags for all other languages and technologies (for both Microsoft and OpenSource), but not "PHP" nor "LAMP\WASP\WIMP\WISP" ?
PHP\LAMP articles are currently bunched under some very generic tag called "Web Development".
I have read the previous denials to add "PHP" nor "LAMP\WASP\WIMP\WISP" because:
- It is not Microsoft
- There are plenty of other resources outsite of CodeProject discussing PHP
Why the bias against PHP?
Believe me, PHP language has a strong presence in the Windows arena, or it would not have been included within "Microsoft Web Platform Installer 3.0".
I am requesting for these additional article tags:
- "PHP" as an "Language" Article Tag
- "LAMP" as an "Technology" Article Tag
There is not other site like CodeProject where one can post and share articles pertaining to code development. I have posted C# and C++ articles and prefer this forum for its openest and structure.
I would like to see PHP and LAMP articles be presented as an equal to all other languages and technologies as are given to C++, C#, Java, Python, Ruby, F#, JavaScript, etc..
NOTE:
LAMP - Linux Apache MySQL PHP stack
WASP - Windows Apache SQL-Server PHP stack
WIMP - Windows IIS MySQL PHP stack
WISP - Windows IIS SQL-Server PHP stack
Jeff in Seattle
Interests:
Dating my spouse, Playing with my daughter, and Camping in my SportsMobile.
modified on Saturday, April 30, 2011 1:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
WE have PHP, Linux, Apache, MySQL, Perl and Python as tags. We also have PHP as a colourisation option in the language dropdown while creating articles in the WYSIWYG editor. Plus, we also have PHP, Linux, MySQL, and Perl forums. I'm not sure where you get the impression there's a bias against PHP and LAMP. We fully support and absolutely encourage articles and questions on this topic.
Articles should be posted in the correct section by Topic, not technology, unless the technology is itself the topic. For example, an article on writing a page using PHP will go under Web Development, but will be tagged PHP.
I hope this clarifies things.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Currently we may only vote once for an article. But some articles got updated several times, reflecting an effort by the author to improve the article, fix bugs, add new features.
Some of them, like for example Filter Edit by Ben Hanson or MFC Grid control , have been updated regularly for years. I think we should be able to vote several times for those articles, another solution could be to vote for a supplementary special award when an article has been updated over a long period of time.
Yarp
http://www.senosoft.com/
|
|
|
|
|
You can change your vote now. Try it with any article that you already voted for, it will say "You voted X for this article. Revote?" to the left of the voting buttons (X is the rating you gave).
Not sure if it works if you voted long ago, before the system was changed.
Never mind, misunderstood your meaning.
modified on Saturday, April 30, 2011 9:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Thats not what the OP means. He wants to offer a 2nd or 3rd vote simply because the author has been consistently providing updates.
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't paying attention. That would make sense in a way, but the implementation and arguments over details will have the hamsters pulling out their fur...
|
|
|
|
|
Well the author could branch into a new article every time he releases a really major update. That way people who use it can give him a deserving vote once again. And the old versions remain archived too.
I've experienced this in my articles when I update them to a newer version of VS or .NET. Someone will mail me asking if I still have thd old version! So archiving older versions is not that bad an idea.
|
|
|
|