|
Thanks Dave.
What a truly bizarre idea, it must be a nightmare to maintain.
There is no failure only feedback
|
|
|
|
|
It's a mistake. You aren't suppoesed to be able to log on at all.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Since it can happen to even the most careful, how about another button on the message editing screen that says "Check for repost". This would take the message text and search that forum for posts with that text.
|
|
|
|
|
repost[^]
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.4
|
|
|
|
|
Oh snap! If we had the Repost Check button I would have known.
|
|
|
|
|
User name: priyanshudubey
|
|
|
|
|
|
He is so fast. Almost most of his spam answers with in 1 min interval.
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't take much time to click on a random link, then paste the same post and click submit.
|
|
|
|
|
For spammers like that, it shouldn't take long for members to notice and click the "Report" button on the spammer's profile page. That will disable the spammer's account.
|
|
|
|
|
This one[^]. My apologies to Albert Holguin, wishing someone with superpowers will restore it soon.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
How could you possibly do such a thing? Good god man!
--
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
Restored.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Restored.
It's still displayed as 'Deleted' here (tried Ctrl-F5 a few times, to no avail).
|
|
|
|
|
I was trying to find a thread I started in the Lounge a week or so ago, but no matter what I tried I couldn't find it. Fortunately, I also emailed it to a friend, so I could get the posting date, and work back though the pages to get to it (82 pages back) http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3911577/Bill-the-cat-Calling-a-Spayed-a-Spayed.aspx[^]
I searched for "Forum messages" and then, "Everything" Sorted by Relevance, and the "Date Desc", with the terms "Bill the Cat" "Spayed" "Vet" and even "Oi! No B@llocks!" (with the quotes) Nothing found it.
Does searching not scan Lounge posts?
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
I just typed Bill the cat into the search box at the top of this page, selected Messages and it worked fine.
|
|
|
|
|
When I just tried exactly that, and sorted by date descending, it goes "10 Jun 2011", "10 Jun 2011", "7 May 2011", "2 May 2011" - completely missing "1 Jun 2011"!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
Works perfectly, and strangely the top item was an old CCC!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC Link[ ^]
Trolls[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glad to know it isn't just me!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
more proof: I used "asseveration" (today's CCC answer) a couple of days ago in a reply to Trollslayer, and now I can't find it any more with CP search.
Google returns this[^] which I enter as evidence; however the link isn't functioning as expected. Even the cached page is unrelated.
Also CP search for "a declaration that is made emphatically" returns nothing.
Seems like a number of items have not been indexed for some reason.
Found it here[^].
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.4
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea what Google is doing there.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
So they do make mistakes after all.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.4
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like our search crawler missed some messages during an incremental crawl. We'll do a full recrawl tonight during off-peak.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|