|
oh, sorry sir. 
|
|
|
|
|
Also update the content of the message. For example, change it into:
Currently, we need to go to My Bookmarks to remove a bookmark. I suggest to make it easier: when you click on "Bookmark" for a question that is already bookmarked, remove the bookmark"
|
|
|
|
|
done sir, thank you for the help.
|
|
|
|
|
Points 9 and 10 on the bar of "A few simple rules when posting your question." are not visible.
Maybe a CSS error? My screen is 1980x1080px.
|
|
|
|
|
The settings editor is not preserving the state of the Company Size and as a result, unless you set it again before saving, the professional profile status is lost and (-250 rep drop).
Update the editor to ensure the drop down retains the current setting on loading of the profile data.
|
|
|
|
|
Create folder with password protection[^]
I edited my answer to change "Access Control Lists" to "Access Control Entry", but realized I was right in the first place. I opened my version by clicking V2, selected to Rollback to Version 1, it asked if I was sure, clicked Yes, and then it gave an error about "unable to create article file" (or something to that effect). It rolled it back but created Version 3.
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] little article showed up as a Featured Article.
|
|
|
|
|
I just placed this post[^] over in the lounge. It's a request for opinions on another site that purports to teach people about things they've never known before. I wanted other people's ideas before I invested my time there.
Ugh, it appears to be creating an absolutely wrong and totally unintended impact; i.e., folks here seem to think (my inference from initial comments) that I'm spamming/advertising the place.
Honestly, I've barely even seen the place.
And so, here's my suggestion: a place to discuss other sites that purport to instruct/inform/whatever
e.g.,
I learned GlarbleStoink from the MakeYouRealSmart.com website. It was very easy
or
I found the GlarbleStoink course on MakeYouRealSmart.com to be totally hopeless
Or,,,,,,,, Is that what the lounge here is all about in the first place ?
|
|
|
|
|
C-P-User-3 wrote: it appears to be creating an absolutely wrong and totally unintended impact; i.e., folks here seem to think (my inference from initial comments) that I'm spamming/advertising the place.
I just read the responses and not one of them suggests that.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to re-read what you posted. All you sais was that "this site just popped up on my desktop". What do you think that means to us??
You didn't say "Hey, what's your opinion of this site?". That probably would have changed the types of responses you got.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove items from the moderation queue that are currently locked for editing.
A bit pointless allowing people to comment/report/approve or whatever when the item is currently being edited. Pop it back onto the queue when the editing is complete/lock released.
|
|
|
|
|
Choosen tags are not getting saved in Top Article Tab.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Guys
Is there a way I can query CP for metrics on its 10000000+ members?
Specifically what I'm thinking of is a way to ask: Give me a count of all members with more than 10 years experience who are active on the site, collated by programming language?
And it might return me raw numbers (no personal info) that could be feasibly be rendered into a bar-chart.
I realise that we already have the daily/weekly digests of article mods, but this would allow me to comprehend the trends much more easily.
Perhaps this could even be a permanent-ish graph on CP showing how what's-being-worked-on is changing over time, with the possibility of pre-filtering what data gets included in the graph.
Just an idea.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think its possible with the data that CP has on us. Right now the only way to know what languages we have experience in is to parse our profile description or look at the tags of our posts. This would be a lot easier if it had profile fields for experience and languages, but it doesn't.
Right now I think the best you could get is active members, years they are a member, and most active tags/forums. Doesn't really give you much about experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If I go to page 9 of the Lounge (either directly, or through the next button) then click on any topic, IE crashes. (IE10, Windows 8, Web03)
Only page 9. Very odd.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, that same thing happened a couple of months ago. A few of us talked about it[^] in the Lounge.
Try changing the number of posts you have per page, that should change what page it happens on.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Coolio... thanks for that. I just waited till the topic I wanted to read moved to page 10... Would be interesting to know why it's happening though!!
|
|
|
|
|
I'll post a new note here to suggest that CodeProject forums support sorting by the latest postings, or to sort threads by the most recent update date (any change/addition to the thread).
Now I could just upvote suggestions from the past on this same topic, but no one would ever see that action unless they dug into history. And that's exactly the point here. If someone necromances a thread, even a fairly recent one in an active group, no one will see their update unless they happen to be scrolling back into history. We should have the option to see the most recent activity in the group - that's standard in every other forum package. (Not being snotty, really, just citing precendent...)
This has been an open request here for over 13 years that I can (with a search on the word 'sort'). I'm really hoping this one is finally put into the priority list.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
We actually implemented this a long time ago and then disabled it.
Sorting by date-last-touched only works in Thread View. In normal view it means that there will, inevitably, by a thread that gets stuck at the top. The longer it's at the top the more people will post. The more people post to it the longer it stays at the front. Eventually the first 10, 20 or 50 pages will be that same thread and the forum is choked to death.
So no - not going to happen I'm afraid.
|
|
|
|
|
Sincere thanks for your comment - and of course for the initial attempt.
It seems to me that popular threads eventually fizzle out, usually within a few days really, though sure, some go on for weeks. When they're resurrected they'll hang there for just a few days more, but all discussions like this fade with time. Discussions that go on too long, digressing into unproductivity, should be closed by the manager.
That some discussions become heated and remain at the top of activity isn't a bug or flaw. That's what people want to discuss ... until they don't want to talk about it anymore.
What you're describing is the notion that newer threads will have priority over older ones which people would like to continue discussing. That's like telling someone you're on the phone with that you need to break to answer the other line. The latest call is not always the most important one.
I respectfully request that this concept not be rejected, but re-visited, perhaps allowing article author/managers to determine how they'd like their group to function. Or at least I'm hoping that this topic be kept open for some upvotes and re-evaluation, as people are often discouraged from upvoting an idea that's already rejected. Of course in a short amount of time it will fall off the top and no one will see it again, so it doesn't need to remain open for long. 
Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
Just my 2c, Chris.
Having been writing ToDoList for 10 years now, I often find that problems that once seemed intractable to me are more easily solved when I revisit them with fresh eyes and more experience.
And I don't doubt that you have developers on your team that are both bright enough and experienced enough to solve this issue, because it really is a big issue IMO 
|
|
|
|
|
We've actually solved it, nicely, at the technical level
It's the "how to avoid the inevitable log jam" that's the issue.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
