|
I don't know the others, but I don't report every commercial product.
If the person answering says it is commercial but it really fits the requirements of the question, I don't say anything and let it be.
What I do report are the messages that are suggesting sites that don't really fit the needs of the OP.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: it really fits the requirements of the question
That's what I am trying to say. If its relevant then it should not be reported.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Don't forget - we also have long memories. It's quite possible that we have had the site they are linking to "pushed" on us as spam before and have a hair trigger about it!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've just noticed the issue has bee n closed as "not reproducable" but I can confirm that it still exists (at least for me)
14. Editing member profiles may cause loss of professional status if fields are not carefully checked[^]
As @Chris-Maunder mentioned that he's unable to reproduce the issue I'll raise it here again and provide a bit of additional details (I would have added a comment on the Task item itself but I found no possibility of adding a comment on the issue myself)
I've noticed that everytime I go to my "Professional Profile" the value of "Company Size" get's reset to "--Not Supplied--" and thus revoking the professional status, as this is a required field for that status.
I noticed however that after saving the profile (with "--Not Supplied--" as company size the box on the right still mentiones that the professional profile is complete. Only if I go back to my normal profile page -> settings -> professional profile the box indicates that it isn't complete).
Tested in: Google Chrome (Version 34.0.1847.116 m )
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Team,
If the comment is having HTML inside it, then it is rendered as HTML Controls.
Refer the image - [Bug] TextBox inside Notification[^].
The comment is...
Quote: strb.Append("<input id=""Text1"" style="" width=""50px"" text-align: center;"" class=""txt"" type=""text"" name='value_""1""_txb' value=""class:" & k & """/>")
This should show as Plain text, but currently it is showing one TextBox .
Thanks,
modified 17-Apr-14 14:52pm.
|
|
|
|
|
So i have Profile popups enabled in suggestions & The Lounge pages but it is working in The Lounge but not in suggestions page here.
|
|
|
|
|
Already on the TODO[^].
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
There are alot of Emotions[^] in the site so why not place them all in the right section on message when writing message currently there are 27 emotions why not add the remaining ones like the ones in the provided link above?
|
|
|
|
|
To add a sense of discovery.
Seriously.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Or you don't want to add items to your ToDo list
|
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] article has some broken links in the references section.
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like it is possible to report a user for abuse (and presumably spam) again if you refresh the page after reporting.
Naturally, I didn't test this extensively, so I don't know if the multiple reports actually count or if the display just updates.
What is this talk of release? I do not release software. My software escapes leaving a bloody trail of designers and quality assurance people in its wake.
|
|
|
|
|
BotCar wrote: I don't know if the multiple reports actually count or if the display just updates
If you click twice on the "Spam" or "Abusive/Troll" link, then your report won't count twice, but you'll be able to see the current count of reports. Sometimes I click twice on the report link to see how many reports the spammer already has, but my report won't count twice.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, good to know. I was getting a bit worried.
What is this talk of release? I do not release software. My software escapes leaving a bloody trail of designers and quality assurance people in its wake.
|
|
|
|
|
Download is not working for http://www.codeproject.com/KB/java/JSearch_Engine/JSearchEngine.zip
|
|
|
|
|
Try again. I had no problems with it.
|
|
|
|
|
I no longer see how to post an alternative to a tip. (IE 11, Win 7)
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
I the left hand menu there is a link "Add your own alternative version"
|
|
|
|
|
Excuse me, I'll be smacking my head for a while, carry on.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually it was our fault. I had the link hidden in between updates and only added it back yesterday,
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Trying to reply to this message: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4800975/Shouldnt-we-stay-away-from-piracy-Referenced-quest.aspx[^]
Here, though I don't think it'll help: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Edit.aspx?fid=1652005&select=4800970&floc=/Forums/1652005/Spam-and-Abuse-Watch.aspx&action=r[^]
Whenever I tried to post, I got the message above. Open a new window, press reply, copy and paste the text and it went straight in.
The actual text I was trying to post was:
I'm not sure about that one - the site that the downloads come from is msft at digitalrivercontent, which is where the Microsoft legitimate downloads come from - so there is very, very little chance that the download is of illegal material: <a href="http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-windows_install/is-digitalrivercontentnet-windows-iso-legit-to/585dcf4b-b932-41be-bd4e-5f3184652ff5">answers.microsoft.com</a>[<a href="http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-windows_install/is-digitalrivercontentnet-windows-iso-legit-to/585dcf4b-b932-41be-bd4e-5f3184652ff5" target="_blank" title="New Window">^</a>]
If the download is legit, then it would need an activation code which won't come with it.
I don't see a reason for abuse votes here.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
That happens when the message is deleted while you're posting. No one has permission to reply to something deleted.
(Yes, the error message is accurate and completely useless)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
No, the message wasn't deleted: when I opened a new tab from the QA list without refreshing the list, pasted the text of my reply into that, and submitted it there, it went straight in.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|