|
Marco Bertschi wrote: And why can I all of sudden add a vote below 4 without providing a comment?
This is now by design: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5009179/Article-Voting-The-dangers-of-all-good-news.aspx[^]
Marco Bertschi wrote: While the second one seems to hang in there with one leg (I still can see the profile info, except that there is a text block stating the account is closed and who's votes closed it) the first one seems to be completely gone. Why?
The first link you provided is the /Members/username link. When a member is removed, its username is free to use again for everyone, so the /Members/username page shows that the requested member is not found. Your second link is the View.aspx?mid=ID link. When a member is removed, its ID is not free again, so there it shows who closed the account.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
ProgramFOX wrote: The first link you provided is the /Members/username link. When a member is removed, its username is free to use again for everyone, so the /Members/username page shows that the requested member is not found. Your second link is the View.aspx?mid=ID link. When a member is removed, its ID is not free again, so there it shows who closed the account.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
After tagging this[^] question, the edit history shows my edit as authored by "No name". Clicking the author link takes me to my profile, as expected.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
All seems good from what I can see.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It did say "No name" at the time Ravi posted his bug report. Caching issue, perhaps?
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, looks good now. It showed "No name" earlier, even after I Ctrl/F5 'd.
Thanks,
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
This bug is back. Seen a few moments ago on Web03, build 2.8.150520.1.
Screenshot[^]
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
This always seems to happen and then eventually fixes itself so I always assumed it was a caching issue of some sort.
|
|
|
|
|
There should be an official android app for code project with customize alters. so that we can track our questions and post easily on mobile
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the suggestion
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 24-May-15 16:47pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
How do I get suggestions for my question if my question was closed.The reason:Closed because this exact post has already been posted by another member.Which other member?
modified 23-May-15 15:22pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Your second question got most likely reported as "Repost", because you accidentally posted it twice. That closure reason is the one for Repost, but because the first question wasn't posted by another member, I believe the closure reason there is inaccurate.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
How do i get it reposted without it being closed again? The original post is no where to bee seen
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I am sure i need glasses
|
|
|
|
|
I select View all questions in "Quick answers" section then i do another work in my pc,after some times i was check that page.still it contain the old questions.when i refresh that page then only it showing the updated questions.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I'm not a fan of automatic refresh.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
How about a prompt along the lines of "There are x new questions. Refresh?". Would stop us having to refresh blindly not knowing if there are new questions or not.
|
|
|
|
|
Just saw an interesting concept on Pricespy.
Every article or shop gets a default vote of three, so they can't end up on top of any lists without having actually gotten a few votes.
I'd have to say I like that concept, as it would give a bit better distribution.
While CP is having different weights for different users the default vote would have to be a gold or a platinum one.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a kludge
We use a voting centroid when sorting items by votes. The centroid is (VoteValue_max + VoteValue_min) / 2 (ie 3.0), and all votes are centred around this. No votes means the item has a value of 0. A rating of 1 means a value of -2, a rating of 5 gives a value of 2. It's effectively the same as giving things a single vote of 3 and then sorting, but without actually giving the thing a vote.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
And what happens when the article has a single vote of five?
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with the problem you mentioned. But I think, we should think something better than the solution you suggested. May be giving weightage to the vote count in this case...
I will post my opinion here if I could think of some thing better.
Life is a computer program and everyone is the programmer of his own life.
|
|
|
|
|