|
Works for me. FF 46.0.1.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
i tried 10 times and at last it finaly works. did you just click once and make it ?
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. hole in one.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
I get the post already posted error, but the post wasn't posted when I went to a new tab, but it was after modification and reposting.
Database timeout?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Possibly. Looks like you also posted while I was updating the site. There be Dragons when I update the site.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I registered with same email address over years ago. Now I can't login in to the site, saying "Unknow user ...".
The site looks like a management institute to show how to manager people and resources ...
email - my name separated by .(dot) at gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
Something bad has happened that shouldn't happen but sometimes does happen. Your old account has been de-activated for no reason and somehow you were able to create a new account using that same email (which also shouldn't happen as far as I know). I'm going to try de-activating your current account and re-activating your old one.
Please pray.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I've sent you an email confirmation. Please let me know if you receive it OK.
You may need to send yourself a temporary password as well:
Send Password - CodeProject[^]
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that you've helped him, you still need to show us how to how to manager (sic) people and resources
|
|
|
|
|
That's easy. Sean turns up in Mankini and his famous celebratory nipple tassels and people manage themselves.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
It's almost 2hrs since I commented in 7 Deadly mistakes ...[^]news forum.
I can't vote, I can't comment. What's next.
Jeez!
|
|
|
|
|
The timestamps would indicate that it was approved twenty minutes before you posted this...
When something goes to moderation, it requires "an appropriate human" to look at it and make a decision. If none are available, then it sits there and waits. And there are times when the site is slow because all the necessary volunteers are asleep, or busy working for a living.
Please have a little patience, we do get to these as fast as we can - but since we aren't paid to provide this service some other things do tend to take priority. Paying the rent. Affording food. Sleep. Having a life. That kind of thing...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Approved.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Having a life. Plzz sir, send me one. Its urgent.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: Its urgent.
Nonsense! You've got decades left in you!
I'm uploading a copy of mine for you, but it's going to take a while: reality is quite high resolution, and I don't know any compression techniques that work on it yet...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Has something gone wrong with the Weekly Newsletter? I don't seem to have received one since April.
The Daily News and Web Dev newsletters are still coming through OK.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
The weekly is still going out strong. Did you miss it again this week?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Correct: it didn't turn up this week. I sent an email to the webmaster address - apparently, I'm not the only person experiencing the problem.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Found the issue and fixed.
That was a subtle one. The best kind, eh?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent news!
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Sir;
With regarding to the thread view button, the count doesn't appear correct because the root message is counted with the replies. Either you change the text to "View the 2 messages in this thread" or "View the 1 replay to this message", but not
View the 2 replies to this message
Help people,so poeple can help you.
|
|
|
|
|
This was a database issue which has since been fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I created this account, because I thought it would be different from the StackExchange. I am familiar with the StackExchange network of sites, but I have never been on the programming sector. The only reason I've gained a high rep on some SE sites is that I actually know or do my own research in academic literature. As a beginner, I didn't feel qualified for participating on the Stack Overflow site, because I might lose a lot of points, so much that I would lose all privileges or something, or ask a non-specific, non-expert-level question. I am very good at mining for relevant information, so that's how I passed as an "expert" and got upvotes.
On this site, I was surprised that the set-up was so similar to the StackExchange. It has a preview below the submission form box. It has upvotes and downvotes, and reputation points based on those votes. I asked my first question on this site, and when I returned, I noticed that my question was rated 1/5.
I think CodeProject is for people who code, as it says in the subtitle of the logo, not for people who are absolute beginners.
I would like to know the expectations of the questions and answers that will get upvotes or 5 stars. Some kind of guideline would be helpful.
|
|
|
|