|
You could always point him to the About Us page, and ask him to contact the boss....
|
|
|
|
|
|
To use CAPITAL LETTER is like to shout: yes. But, is to shout always wrong? no! it isn't.
If you lose yourself in a forest and you are in danger you will shout for HELP. is that wrong? No!
Most of the times to shout is wrong, but sometimes could be necessary to be listen.
I am not saying that to shout against codeproject was correct (I never said this. Read carefully all my messages). But, if to shout become necessary to be listen then something, somewhere, went wrong.
who, between all of you, knows how many times I tried to get the issue solved during last week?
who, between all of you, knows how many times my messages was banned as spam?
has anybody asked to me or to himself, why I shouted? No!
Did you, Chris, asked to yourself why a user of your site is shouting? No (you should).
Please, Chris, read carefully the "point b)" in your opt-in opt-out conditions.
in that point, you talk about the problems codeproject has had during last week, but in the same time with the same words, you talk about a long lack of service!
Chris, you gave me the option between leave and remain. But in your "opt-in opt-out" you do not talk about what Kornfeld did: no one can call for respect and use the expression Kornfeld used against me (or anybody else).
To choose between Leave or remain depend on the respect I have of this community and the respect I have of this community depend on the decision its leader (you) takes.
How can I decide between leave and remain if I do not know which is your decision?
with regards
Vincenzo
P.S.
- this sentence «please kick Cornfeld out» is under my account but I never wrote it.
- all the people in your office said you are right and all the people in my office said I am right. But there is a big difference between you and me: you are the 'big boss', and many people are ready to say you are right in any case, also if you declare the earth is flat. in the same way (many, but not all) the people in this chat behave like a pack of wolves. Please, read the chat, and how many Stupid and offensive comments there are. (Sorry Chris, I think you should take your people under better control, please).
|
|
|
|
|
I have always enjoyed reading the The CodeProject Insider Daily Developer News newsletter but for some reason I am not receiving them for the last 3 days. A friend of mine has not received his either. Has this newsletter been discontinued? If not how do I tell your site to send me the last 3 days of newsletters? Thanks... John
P.S. I am sorry if this is not the right forum but I could not see a better place to post the question.
|
|
|
|
|
Apologies, this link should help sort you out:
Email Consent Form[^]
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
If you highlight a code block from an article, tip, QA post, or forum then copy it to the clipboard:
private Image _Image = null;
private Pen _ScratchPen = new Pen(Brushes.Red, 5.0F);
private Brush _CoverBrush = Brushes.LightGray;
It works fine:
private Image _Image = null;
private Pen _ScratchPen = new Pen(Brushes.Red, 5.0F);
private Brush _CoverBrush = Brushes.LightGray; If you use the "copy code" button, you get a mess of HTML as well:
<span class="code-summarycomment">///</span><span class="code-comment"> <span class="code-summarycomment"><</span><span class="code-summarycomment">summary</span><span class="code-summarycomment">></span>
</span><span class="code-summarycomment">///</span><span class="code-comment"> Image to reveal as the top is "scratched off"
</span><span class="code-summarycomment">///</span><span class="code-comment"> <span class="code-summarycomment"><</span><span class="code-summarycomment">/summary</span><span class="code-summarycomment">></span>
</span><span class="code-keyword">private</span> Image _Image = <span class="code-keyword">null</span>;
<span class="code-summarycomment">///</span><span class="code-comment"> <span class="code-summarycomment"><</span><span class="code-summarycomment">summary</span><span class="code-summarycomment">></span>
</span><span class="code-summarycomment">///</span><span class="code-comment"> Pen to scratch with - wider reveals more at a time.
</span><span class="code-summarycomment">///</span><span class="code-comment"> <span class="code-summarycomment"><</span><span class="code-summarycomment">/summary</span><span class="code-summarycomment">></span>
</span><span class="code-summarycomment">///</span><span class="code-comment"> <span class="code-summarycomment"><</span><span class="code-summarycomment">remarks</span><span class="code-summarycomment">></span>
</span><span class="code-summarycomment">///</span><span class="code-comment"> The colour of this pen *MUST* match the colour used in the Paint event
</span><span class="code-summarycomment">///</span><span class="code-comment"> to set the Transparency for the "cover" image.
</span><span class="code-summarycomment">///</span><span class="code-comment"> <span class="code-summarycomment"><</span><span class="code-summarycomment">/remarks</span><span class="code-summarycomment">></span>
</span><span class="code-keyword">private</span> Pen _ScratchPen = <span class="code-keyword">new</span> Pen(Brushes.Red, <span class="code-digit">5</span>.0F);
<span class="code-summarycomment">///</span><span class="code-comment"> <span class="code-summarycomment"><</span><span class="code-summarycomment">summary</span><span class="code-summarycomment">></span>
</span><span class="code-summarycomment">///</span><span class="code-comment"> Brush to fill the cover image with
</span><span class="code-summarycomment">///</span><span class="code-comment"> <span class="code-summarycomment"><</span><span class="code-summarycomment">/summary</span><span class="code-summarycomment">></span>
</span><span class="code-keyword">private</span> Brush _CoverBrush = Brushes.LightGray;
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
This will be fixed next deploy. The issue turned out to be an unintended consequence of a jQuery update.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: an unintended consequence
I must remember that one...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I keep accidentally coming across open-source libraries, and tools, that I consider remarkable in terms of functionality and performance.
I don't think links/blurbs-about these quite fit in the "Freebies" forum, or the Lounge, or other forums.
Your thoughts ?
cheers, Bill
«Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and it may be necessary from time to time to give a stupid or misinformed beholder a black eye.» Miss Piggy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Jochen,
I think the possible advantage of a forum is that more people might contribute. Articles get "submerged" in the great ocean of them; I think a forum is more likely to be "visible."
I see the article you linked to was published in 2007, and, while it has many thank-you comments, none of the comments I saw added any new links to content, or commented on whether its existing links were still valid.
cheers, Bill
«Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and it may be necessary from time to time to give a stupid or misinformed beholder a black eye.» Miss Piggy
|
|
|
|
|
Billji,
If you prefer to not post an article at this time, could you PM me your list of libs? Many thanks!
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Namaste, Ravi-ji,
Two excellent open-source libraries I'm currently evaluating are:
1. XDMessaging.NET : ipc without server client; very easy to use. I found out, after discovering XDMessaging, that the author had a CP article published in 2007; that's been updated in 2010, but is out of date now. I've written the author, and requested he update the CP article. last dev activity on github two-months ago. I am experimenting with the "lite" package to enable duplex communication between WinForm apps, but the full package can do remoting using AWS.
home: [^]
github: [^]
2. Message-Pack C-Sharp : fast serializer/deserializer; produces very small compressed packages; very easy to use compared to Proto-buf and other tools. being actively developed now.
github: [^]
cheers, Bill
«Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and it may be necessary from time to time to give a stupid or misinformed beholder a black eye.» Miss Piggy
|
|
|
|
|
Any idea why this question was removed?
How to prevent a process from being killed in task manager?[^]
It is great that university students are interested in developing anti-malware software for the Windows platform and as far as I can tell my answer is the only mention of ELAM for protecting security products. It would be great to retain that type of information here on codeproject.
|
|
|
|
|
From my Point of view a big lack here, one is not allowed to discuss about this theme.
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Well,
It sounds like an overzealous approach to moderation. Protecting Anti-Malware[^] processes and Digital Rights Management[^] processes are perfectly valid and an important part of software engineering.
Windows IoT also supports ELAM (with protected processes and services) and I am looking forward to what future university students will create to protect our 'Internet of Things' future. Let's give them all the information they need to accomplish this.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Ok your two links are the official ones. I prefer to discuss every dirty technics of maleware/ransomware/hacking what else.
My Point is: Knowledge is the best defence. And what Tools so called "hackers" can use if everything is on the table?
But I'm pretty alone with this opinion here
Bruno
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: one is not allowed to discuss about this theme. A lot of people agree with you and that bothers me a lot. The more we know about how hackers do what they do the more we can right safer code. This is a topic that should be welcomed here.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
So we are on the same line I think? Or it is one more time my English...
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: So we are on the same line I think?
No, I don't think so. If I understood you correctly, you do NOT think we should discuss how to write a program that cannot be ended. I think we SHOULD discuss it.
Hope that is clear.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it is my English. See what I wrote to Randor:
Quote: .... I prefer to discuss every dirty technics of maleware/ransomware/hacking what else ...
My Point is: Knowledge is the best defence....
But I'm pretty alone with this opinion here ...
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I see it now. I think I misunderstood you. My apologies.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
No Problem. If I read my first post here again -and translate it back with Google- I'm also have my doubts how I wrote it
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, he does keep reposting the same question, and that copy certainly doesn't include much information.
But as far as I can see, that was the first copy, so it's the subsequent duplicates that should have been removed.
And your answer was very good, and should definitely be kept.
(If you've still got the information, maybe you could write it up as a tip?)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Richard Deeming wrote: (If you've still got the information, maybe you could write it up as a tip?)
That's exactly what I had planned along with some sample drivers, simple service and a protected non-killable user-mode process. Although I think Microsoft may already has a sample ELAM driver.
Btw... there is no way that this information can be weaponized as malware... The whole point of this new system is that all three binaries would need to be dual signed with both an EV (extended validation) certificate and also by the Microsoft Dev Portal after being submitted and going through a vetting process.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
modified 6-Jul-17 15:35pm.
|
|
|
|