|
I'm hoping this is where you left off?
https://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=4241354&aid=5283099
Are you able to access it?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tried all three links. None of them works.
|
|
|
|
|
Out of curiosity, did you receive an email saying your submission was closed? Please try this link:
https://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=4241373&aid=5283099
Also, I would recommend if you're finished with your post to please include some write-up about the code. What brought you to the problem in the first place, expanding on the problem a bit, why you needed a solution, and how the code works.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
You may have a browser caching issue. try clearing your browser cache and see if you can access the article after that.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks everyone, you successfully recovered my trick, I was able to update it and it is now pending for approval.
Cheers,
T.
|
|
|
|
|
I have created a question on the question list it is showing 4hrs ago
Where as in detail it is showing correct
|
|
|
|
|
This is probably a Time Zone issue. I'll look into it.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
This user has called my attention because the reputation is way over the usual standards for an account that is a couple of hours old
Allysia Goss - Professional Profile[^] 801 participant points.
Usually registering an account, the newsletter and other possible things has given (up to now) 351 or 501, but 801 is the first time I see it.
Is it correct?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like they somehow got double credit for some reputation points.
I'll be looking into this.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
It would be nice to tag certain "abused" QA entries as "readonly" to stop people from posting garbage as solutions.
For example, the "Convert language A to language B" questions where noobs think this is a code conversion service and they just post a code snippet thinking they'll get the converted code written for them.
|
|
|
|
|
Please simply delete the question or report it as "Not a Question". No need to have debris lying around.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It's something more along the lines of a legit question, but now old, that people have answered with legit answers, but now, a couple years later, people are posting new "Solutions" with their own code they seem to want converted to whatever language was in the OP's title.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah!
So mark them as "not an answer"!
In all seriousness: Quick Answers needs to be a place of good questions and direct answers. The less debris people have to wade through the more useful it is. We strongly encourage everyone to cleanup (edit, refine, clarify - or delete) any messy bits you come across.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
We do. The problem is we're on Solution 20, 30 something on these questions and they keep getting popped up to the top of the queue over and over again.
|
|
|
|
|
That is why I changed the title. Perhaps they will go somewhere else now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
...so the ability to lock a question is needed then.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: We strongly encourage everyone to cleanup (edit, refine, clarify - or delete) any messy bits you come across. I don't want to be like SO but there is really a lot of crap in the Q&A that could be cleaned up wihtout a problem.
We did that a couple of times and then we were "blamed" by some long time users, that we are nobody to delete things and similars...
In my case... I got tired of trying to argue with them.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
If no one has posted more than an exploratory comment and no answer, those would be safe to delete. How could a long time user find issue if the question no longer exists, and they had never taken part of it?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
would it be possible to add a :facepalm: icon?
facepalm - Google Search[^]
I know we have the icon, but it is not exactly the same...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
How about:
🤦♂️ / 🤦♀️
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
exact.... I only have to edit now your message to know how you post them
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
If you're on Windows 10, it's simple: press Win+., type "falcepalm", and select the emoji. 😎
Alternatively, you could search for them on Emojipedia[^] and use copy+paste.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: f you're on Windows 10, it's simple: press Win+., I didn't know about that one...
Thanks
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|