|
Are you aware that the (reply page) "Quote Text" button does not display in Mozilla 1.7?
"No matter where you go, there your are." - Buckaroo Banzai
-pete
|
|
|
|
|
Also missing is the entire "Formatting" row of commands ( Smiley's are there )
"No matter where you go, there your are." - Buckaroo Banzai
-pete
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support for Firefox (i.e. Message View, etc.) seems to be broken at the moment. I know I am not the only one missing Message View at the moment!
http://www.codeproject.com/script/misc/browsercheck.asp shows:
Server Web1
Browser firefox
Gecko False
Version 0.8
Crawler False
UserAgent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040614 Firefox/0.8
IE3+ False
IE4+ False
IE5+ False
IE6+ False
Netscape False
NS4+ False
NS6/Mozilla1 False
Opera6+ False
Gecko = False is probably the root cause here...
Thanks in advance Chris.
The Rob Blog
|
|
|
|
|
I am using FireFox 0.9 without any problems from multiple PCs. My browsercheck differs only in these items...
Gecko True
Version 1.7
UserAgent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040614 Firefox/0.9
my blog
|
|
|
|
|
I spoke too soon. Not working anymore for me on one machine
Gecko is now showing false on the browsercheck page. Also, I think that previously the server was Web5 or 6, and now it is Web1. Not sure if that matters.
my blog
|
|
|
|
|
Please try now
cheers,
Chris Maunder
Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
|
|
|
|
|
Still no joy:
Server Web4
Browser firefox
Gecko False
Version 0.8
Crawler False
UserAgent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040614 Firefox/0.8
IE3+ False
IE4+ False
IE5+ False
IE6+ False
Netscape False
NS4+ False
NS6/Mozilla1 False
Opera6+ False
The Rob Blog
|
|
|
|
|
Just tried again (18:50 UK) and it's working again. Thanks Chris.
Server Web4
Browser firefox
Gecko True
Version 0.8
Crawler False
UserAgent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040614 Firefox/0.8
IE3+ False
IE4+ False
IE5+ False
IE6+ False
Netscape False
NS4+ False
NS6/Mozilla1 False
Opera6+ False
The Rob Blog
|
|
|
|
|
Any plans for a black CP t-shirt?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. No date though.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
|
|
|
|
|
One of the critaria to have platinum level is to post 25 and above articles, but is there any conditions for the article that will be considered for the platinum level membership?
forexample if i post 25 crapy articles and they are all in plugatory will my membership level be platinum?
I asked so coz if you see the articles by euacela , most of them are below 2 rated (may be all).
I asked so because, if I want to see all the articles by a platinum member, I would be surprised to see them in plagatory and poorly written that no one would like to read.
I'll write a suicide note on a hundred dollar bill - Dire Straits
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.Prakash wrote:
if i post 25 crapy articles and they are all in plugatory will my membership level be platinum
Briefly. Until we delete the articles.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Firstly i congratulate u all for ur efforts in running the Discussion Forum Effectively and successfully.
I suggest u to please include "Porting" as a sub head in the Discussion Forum. Its completely ur choice to include it as seperate head like the Managed C++, STL ...etc or under the General Discussion Head.
It will be highly helpful for all those who are working on Porting either one way or the other way. Like either Porting Code from One Language to other or from one OS to Another.
Hope u will find it effective and do the needful for the same.
Cheers !
|
|
|
|
|
Well you can always use the forum of the language that you are porting to.
I'll write a suicide note on a hundred dollar bill - Dire Straits
|
|
|
|
|
There is an article at link http://www.codeproject.com/dotnet/simple_ocr.asp about creating an OCR with ANN. But the source can not compile because of the commercial library needed by the application which is written and sold by the very same article writer.
Are these kind of articles allowed?
I mean, it does not help you about anything, and gives no idea about what is being done. It only advertises itself?
Please, do something about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hi the whose who search it is not satisfactory
Can’t search by country or by birthdays etc
any help?
|
|
|
|
|
mohammed barqawi wrote:
whose who
I hate to be the spelling police, especially as I can make many smelling pistakes myself, but it is "Who's who". It is a contraction of "Who is who"
"You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want." --Zig Ziglar
The Second EuroCPian Event will be in Brussels on the 4th of September
Can't manage to P/Invoke that Win32 API in .NET? Why not do interop the wiki way!
My Blog
|
|
|
|
|
mohammed barqawi wrote:
search by country or by birthdays
agree
Would be great
|
|
|
|
|
It should not be too difficult to make the Google ads integrate with the overall feel of the site. Orange borders, light orange background, consistent font, an non-bold links would make these ads even less obstrusive.
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I was thinking. The gray doesn't blend too well as you said.
Happy Programming and God Bless!
"Your coding practices might be buggy, but your code is always right."
Internet::WWW::CodeProject::bneacetp
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont agree with you with this Micheal.... Not totally though.
Look at other articles they look so transparent to the site.
yeah, ads should standout, but should not sit on our face.
I'll write a suicide note on a hundred dollar bill - Dire Straits
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't the "Ads by Google" caption enough? Do the ads have to look crappy too?
Distinctive look is one thing, but the way they look now is distracting and amateurish.
|
|
|
|