Introduction
Microsoft ASP.NET MVC is arguably one of the most flexible frameworks for building modern web applications. One of the things that I've noticed over the last couple of years is that with many AJAX applications using Restful web service, many MVC controllers are now almost redundant.
Background
Using the default MVC HTTP handler means that regardless of whether you actually need server-side code for rendering each view, you must have a corresponding controller and action.
ASP.NET MVC Default Routing Behaviour
Looking at the CustomerController
that you would create for this example, you'd have something like this:
public class CustomerController : Controller
{
public ActionResult Index()
{
return View();
}
public ActionResult Detail()
{
return View();
}
}
In many cases, these controllers have one or more actions that simply returns the corresponding view. This seems inefficient and adds to the maintenance cost of the application.
This raises some fundamental questions:
- Isn't one of the principles of objected oriented programming the re-use of code?
- Does the code above reflect that principle?
- What if we were to add more views handled by that controller?
- Would the situation be improved if we were able to omit those actions which only return a view and focus on the code specific to your application?
So how can we get around this? Wouldn't it be great if we could just have a single re-usable controller with a single action instead of creating multiple copies of the same thing? The good news is that it's easy with MVC!
ASP.NET MVC Modified Routing Behaviour
Create a Custom HTTP Handler
The first thing that we need to create is a custom HTTP handler [ControllerLessHttpHandler.cs]. This will look for a controller relevant to the view being requested; if it finds one, then it will work in the usual way. This means that if you need a controller for specific pages, you can still add them.
If it doesn't find a controller for the view, it will re-route the request to a re-usable controller-less view controller (we'll get to that a bit later on).
using System.Web;
using System.Web.Mvc;
using System.Web.Routing;
using Anterec.ControllerLess.Configuration;
public class ControllerLessHttpHandler : IHttpHandler
{
private readonly RequestContext _requestContext;
private readonly RouteConfiguration _configuration;
public ControllerLessHttpHandler(RequestContext requestContext)
{
_requestContext = requestContext;
_configuration = RouteConfiguration.GetConfigurationSettings();
var target = typeof(ControllerLessHttpHandler).Namespace;
if (!ControllerBuilder.Current.DefaultNamespaces.Contains(target))
{
ControllerBuilder.Current.DefaultNamespaces.Add(target);
}
}
public bool IsReusable
{
get { return true; }
}
public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext httpContext)
{
var controller = _requestContext.RouteData.GetRequiredString("controller");
var action = string.Empty;
if (_requestContext.RouteData.Values["action"] != null)
{
action = _requestContext.RouteData.Values["action"].ToString();
}
if (action != string.Empty)
{
IController viewController = null;
IControllerFactory controllerFactory = null;
try
{
controllerFactory = ControllerBuilder.Current.GetControllerFactory();
try
{
viewController = controllerFactory.CreateController(_requestContext, controller);
viewController.Execute(_requestContext);
}
catch
{
DispatchRequest(controllerFactory, controller, action);
}
}
finally
{
if (controllerFactory != null)
{
controllerFactory.ReleaseController(viewController);
}
}
}
}
private void DispatchRequest(IControllerFactory controllerFactory, string controller, string action)
{
var route = GetRoute(controller, action);
_requestContext.RouteData.Values["x-action"] = action;
_requestContext.RouteData.Values["x-controller"] = controller;
if (route != null)
{
_requestContext.RouteData.Values["controller"] = route.Controller;
_requestContext.RouteData.Values["action"] = route.Action;
if (route.Area != string.Empty)
{
_requestContext.RouteData.DataTokens["area"] = route.Area;
}
controller = route.Controller;
}
else
{
_requestContext.RouteData.Values["action"] = _configuration.DefaultAction;
controller = _configuration.DefaultController;
}
var viewController = controllerFactory.CreateController(_requestContext, controller);
if (viewController != null)
{
viewController.Execute(_requestContext);
}
}
private RouteElement GetRoute(string controller, string action)
{
RouteElement route;
if (_requestContext.RouteData.Values["area"] != null)
{
var area = _requestContext.RouteData.Values["area"].ToString();
route = _configuration.Get(string.Format("/{0}/{1}/{2}", area, controller, action));
}
else
{
route = _configuration.Get(string.Format("/{0}/{1}", controller, action));
}
return route;
}
}
Create the Route Handler
Next, we need to create a custom route handler [ControllerLessRouteHandler.cs] to let MVC know which HTTP handler to use to process each request.
using System.Web;
using System.Web.Routing;
public sealed class ControllerLessRouteHandler : IRouteHandler
{
IHttpHandler IRouteHandler.GetHttpHandler(RequestContext requestContext)
{
return new ControllerLessHttpHandler(requestContext);
}
}
Create the Custom Controller
Now we can add the custom view controller that the requests will be routed through [ControllerLessController.cs].
using System.Web.Mvc;
public class ControllerLessController : Controller
{
public virtual ActionResult Index()
{
var action = RouteData.Values["x-action"].ToString();
var controller = RouteData.Values["x-controller"].ToString();
RouteData.Values["action"] = action;
RouteData.Values["controller"] = controller;
if (RouteData.Values["area"] != null)
{
RouteData.DataTokens["area"] = RouteData.Values["area"].ToString();
}
return View(action);
}
}
Update the MVC Route Configuration
Once all this is in place, we can configure the MVC routes [RouteConfig.cs] to use the custom route handler.
using System.Web.Mvc;
using System.Web.Routing;
public class RouteConfig
{
public static void RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes)
{
routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}");
var route = new Route(
"{controller}/{action}/{id}",
new RouteValueDictionary(new { controller = "Home",
action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional }),
new ControllerLessRouteHandler());
routes.Add(route);
}
}
Now give it a try. Simply add a view without a corresponding controller, start up your application and navigate to the view in your browser.
You can now add as many views as you like, without needing to add any more controllers and/or actions. And if you need an action or controller for a specific view, just add it in the normal way and it will work as expected.
NuGet
A NuGet package supporting both C# and VB.NET views and with more configuration options is available at https://www.nuget.org/packages/ControllerLess.
GitHub
The full source code for the NuGet package can be found at https://github.com/brentj73/ControllerLess.
History
Originally published by Brent Jenkins at http://www.anterec.co.uk/articles/using-aspnet-mvc-5-without-creating-controllers-for-each-view/.