Introduction
Recently, a reader asked me how to sort an alpha numeric field in SQL in natural order.
When we have numeric fields, we expect values to be sorted in ordinal order, for example: 1,2,5,7,10,11,15,20,21.
However when these numbers are in character field, such as char
or varchar
, the sort becomes alphabetic and the ordering not what we may wish: 1,10,11,15,2,20,21,5,7.
For numerals in a text field we could easily convert the values to numeric values and sort; however, this option isn’t available if the column values contain alphanumeric values.
NOTE: This is somewhat of an intermediate to advanced article. I’m assuming that you already know of the LEFT
, SUBSTRING
, and CONVERT
functions.
Sorting Alphabetic versus Alphanumeric
For this example, we’ll assume we have defined a table named Section
that consists of one varchar(50)
field named section
. Here is the definition:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87fba/87fbad26e709d303452793c16ea30d06302beb59" alt=""
Our table contains the following alphanumeric values:
1
AB1
A1
B2
A11
B20
B21
AB10
B3
AB100
2
B1
B32
11
A10
Which we want to sort alphanumerically as:
1
2
11
A1
A10
A11
AB1
AB10
AB100
B1
B2
B3
B20
B21
B32
But when you try:
SELECT Section
FROM Section
ORDER BY Section
The results aren’t as we expect:
1
11
2
A1
A10
A11
AB1
AB10
AB100
B1
B2
B20
B21
B3
B32
The items in red aren’t sorted according to alphanumeric order. The reason for this is that SQL sorts character by character from left to right. In its mind, the correct alphabetical sequence is …B1, B2, B20, B21, B3,…
Once nice feature about SQL is that you can sort an expression. Because of this, we can create our own formula to sort.
There are two approaches. The first is a simple approach that will work with my example and the second is much more complex, but works in general with any alphanumeric data.
First the Simple Case
In the simple case, the idea is to separate the alpha characters from the numeric, then sort by the alpha characters, convert the numeric portion to a number and sort.
Conceptually, our SQL statement will look like:
SELECT Section
FROM Section
ORDER BY SectionAlpha, SectionNumeric
We really don’t have columns for SectionAlpha
and SectionNumeric
, instead we are going to use two expressions to separate the character portion of the data from the numeric.
The trick is to know where the number begins. To do this, we can use a special formula called PATINDEX.
This formula can be used to find the character position within a string
that matches a particular pattern, such as ‘%[0-9]%
’.
We talked about patterns in our article on pattern matching. You may recall that %[0-9]%
means to return a match, if any position in the string
is in the range of characters 0-9
.
For instance PATINDEX(‘SQL2005’, ‘%[0-9]%’)
returns 4
, since the numeral 2
is in the fourth position.
Stated differently, the first character to match %[0-9]%
is 2
, which is in position 4
.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/688d8/688d89747424cbad333637e128c3cf22bf596af6" alt=""
Knowing where the number starts is half the story. We now need to separate the value into a character and numeric portion. To do this, we’ll use two string
functions:
- LEN(expression) – Returns the number of characters found in an expression.
LEN(‘MICHIGAN’)
returns 8
. - LEFT(expression, length) – Starting from the left, position
1
, this function returns the length amount of characters. LEFT(‘Airplane’,3)
returns ‘Air
’.
- SUBSTRING(expression, start, length) – Starting at a specified position, this function returns the specified amount of characters from a character expression.
SUBSTRING(‘Airplane’,4,2)
returns ‘pl
’.
Using the diagram above, you can see that everything to the left of the number is a character.
To get the alpha portion, we use the following expression:
LEFT(Section,PATINDEX('%[0-9]%',Section)-1)
The expression instructs SQL to get all the characters to the left of the first numeric character in the section column.
Then numeric portion is obtained using:
SUBSTRING(Section,PATINDEX('%[0-9]%',Section),LEN(Section))
This instructs SQL to get all characters, starting where the first numeric character is found until the end of the value.
Finally, we take the numeric string
we find and convert it to an integer
using the CONVERT
function.
The final format for the selection statement is:
SELECT Section
FROM dbo.Section
ORDER BY LEFT(Section, PATINDEX('%[0-9]%', Section)-1), -- alphabetical sort
CONVERT(INT, SUBSTRING(Section, PATINDEX('%[0-9]%', Section), LEN(Section))) -- numerical
If you want to try out the example, start up SQL Server Management Studio and paste the following code into a new query window.
USE [AdventureWorks2012_Data]
CREATE TABLE dbo.Section
(
Section varchar(50) NULL
)
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('1')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('AB1')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('A1')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('B2')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('A11')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('B20')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('B21')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('AB10')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('B3')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('AB100')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('2')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('B1')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('B32')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('11')
INSERT INTO dbo.Section (Section.Section) VALUES ('A10')
SELECT Section
FROM dbo.Section
--Show normal Sort
SELECT Section
FROM dbo.Section
ORDER BY Section
--Show AlphaNumberic Sort
SELECT Section
FROM dbo.Section
ORDER BY LEFT(Section,PATINDEX('%[0-9]%',Section)-1), -- alphabetical sort
CONVERT(INT,SUBSTRING(Section,PATINDEX('%[0-9]%',Section),LEN(Section))) -- numerical sort
--cleanup our work
DROP Table dbo.Section
When you run this code, you’ll see three results:
- The unsorted table
- The table sorted with the built-in sort, and
- The table sorted alphanumerically
Hopefully through this example, you’ve see that it is possible to construct a customized sort expression to sort columns alphanumerically.
However, as you have noticed, this example only works when the alphanumeric value consists of one alpha and one numeric section. What about values such as MI10.5AB23
or MI200.5AB500
? Is there an easy way to sort these values alphanumerically?
General Case for Sorting Alphanumeric Values
I recently came across a really good article by Craig Finck on Alphanumeric Sorting In MSSQL. This article is really advanced, and the code complicated, but the short of the matter is that you can create a UDF (User Defined Function) to create the alpha numeric sort value.
Once you read the article, you’ll see how you can define a UFD called fn_CreateAlphanumericSortValue
, which you can then call from your SQL. Later on, I will teach you how to create and define UDFs, but since this article really provides a great general solution to the problem, I wanted to include it as part of this article, so those looking for a really workable solution would know of it, and be able to use it.
Using our example, you could use the UDF to sort as:
SELECT Section
FROM dbo.Section
ORDER BY dbo.fn_CreateAlphanumericSortValue(section)
At this point, you may be saying hey! Why did you go through that first example and all those functions instead of just showing us this general case and the UDF?
Two reasons:
- The UDF is pretty complicated and very advanced. It would be hard to teach, and I wanted you to learn something. Hopefully, you leaned some more about sorts, and also how to use
PATINDEX
, LEFT
, and SUBSTRING
to manipulate character values. - Using user defined functions can solve a lot of problems, but beware that they can cause performance issues. If you inspect this definition, you’ll see there is a lot of program logic. This logic has to be run for each record. This can severely impact the performance of any large query that used this function to soft values.
Because of this, I wouldn’t recommend using this function for every case; It works good for complicated cases, but for simple cases, such as the one I explained, it is easier to use simple string
functions to break out the value and sort.