|
Someone jealous of Minecraft founder.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
-----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Hands up everyone thinking John C. Dvorak owns Apple shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: "The fear of death is worse than death" Therefore, commit suicide for fear of death.
|
|
|
|
|
As a WPF developer for years I was recently concerned by the new direction chosen by Microsoft on its client platforms with the rise of the brand new WinRT framework. WPF FTW? FWIW
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: but he's not wrong.
To whom are you referring, Greg Levenhagen or the author of the blog post?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only reasonable from your point of view because you know what you meant.
Your sentence structure was ambiguous from the point of view of someone who is not inside your head.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The second sentence is even worse. You use the word "like" twice in a row, and all you say is that one should not read into things, but you don't make clear which side you're on.
Can't you just clarify what you meant without making a big deal out of it?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: like like of charm bar support
That wording was carefully chosen?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sure what you mean, I am not.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
It looked like someone downvoted your post. I countered it.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, thanks.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: WPF FTW?
You missed WTF
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's what I think whenever I'm near WPF, so I don't know how I could have missed it.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: You missed WTF No need for it. We all added it mentally.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I am so glad I haven't invested gobs of time learning this stuff.
WPF is mature
Uh...Sort of like my jar of moldy pickles in the fridge? I could come with some more graphic images of "mature", but I'll spare you. From the little I've dabbled with WPF, a not insignificant portion of time is spent working around WPF's shortcomings.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Tried it and it's a no.
There's too many wtf's in there. It is really great if you want animations and bells and sh*t and feel the need to "design" every page. It is not an efficient replacement for WinForms. An alternative, mayhaps, for some, but not a replacement.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
One area of conversation that tends to come about in software engineering is the degree to which one takes their code personally. Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous code review...
|
|
|
|
|
It's our code, but they're my bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
Wise words, indeed.
/ravi
|
|
|
|