|
Only reasonable from your point of view because you know what you meant.
Your sentence structure was ambiguous from the point of view of someone who is not inside your head.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The second sentence is even worse. You use the word "like" twice in a row, and all you say is that one should not read into things, but you don't make clear which side you're on.
Can't you just clarify what you meant without making a big deal out of it?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: like like of charm bar support
That wording was carefully chosen?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sure what you mean, I am not.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
It looked like someone downvoted your post. I countered it.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, thanks.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: WPF FTW?
You missed WTF
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's what I think whenever I'm near WPF, so I don't know how I could have missed it.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: You missed WTF No need for it. We all added it mentally.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I am so glad I haven't invested gobs of time learning this stuff.
WPF is mature
Uh...Sort of like my jar of moldy pickles in the fridge? I could come with some more graphic images of "mature", but I'll spare you. From the little I've dabbled with WPF, a not insignificant portion of time is spent working around WPF's shortcomings.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Tried it and it's a no.
There's too many wtf's in there. It is really great if you want animations and bells and sh*t and feel the need to "design" every page. It is not an efficient replacement for WinForms. An alternative, mayhaps, for some, but not a replacement.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
One area of conversation that tends to come about in software engineering is the degree to which one takes their code personally. Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous code review...
|
|
|
|
|
It's our code, but they're my bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
Wise words, indeed.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: It's our code, but they're my bugs. I'm willing to team up with you, and share code.
The bugs are still all yours, yes?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
History has shown that to be the case.
|
|
|
|
|
Never let it be said that I'm unwilling to learn from history.
I'll compile a batch of bug numbers for you ad CoB today.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is just about to unveil their next major operating system, and with improvements to Windows Update being one of the main factors with this release, it does raise the question as to whether or not Microsoft is planning to change the way Windows is updated. Well, according to a new job listing from Microsoft, the company is "creating a new system that will fundamentally change the way Windows is shipping to put the ecosystem at the center of Windows." No more DVDs! Now it will ship psychically!
|
|
|
|
|
As today you can download and install a large group of updates/fixes before restarting Windows, in the future you will have to restart it after each one
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Remember when they told us that we'd never have to reboot after patching again (I think it was around XP)?
Yeah. Good times.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Wait, what? People still use DVDs to install Windows?
I guess my last Windows DVD was Vista, and it wasn't even a retail original but the burn-it-yourself recovery image from some HP laptop. The last real Windows retail package in my possession was Windows XP Professional RTM, and that came on CD! Kind of reminds me like the world changes: In 1996, it was an amazing experience to install Windows 95 from a CD instead of a stack of 3.5" floppies. Then in 2000, when Windows 2000 came out, you could even boot it from CD if your BIOS supported it, but one time I remember I even used the four floppies in the box just for fun to boot it up. XP didn't even ship with any floppies anymore. Today, I installed every Windows version since 7 from an USB stick.
Now, what else can they do to improve it? Deliver it directly over the web using some WinPE environment? No, thanks. Too much traffic to download all that stuff every other time.
|
|
|
|
|
When teams abandons an Object-Relational Mapper, ORM, because they think it doesn’t perform well or adds too much magic, then it is often due to bad usage Jimmy Bogard states in a recent presentation highlighting what he sees as correct and incorrect ways of using an ORM, including mapping and querying problems. Or, as some would write it, "You are using the ORM. Wrong way."
|
|
|
|