|
I need to disable firewalls. If all firewall cannot be disable then at least guide me to disable WindowsXp firewall.
I am using Visual C++ 6.0
Thanks
Quaidian For Once, Quaidian For Ever
|
|
|
|
|
The firewall is unlikely to shut down quietly - you should just tell your user to turn it off, assuming you absolutely have to.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
|
|
|
|
|
Hi ALL !
actually i have a main dialog which has 3 buttons
the first button when clicked dispplays a dialog
with 3 radio buttons. iam selecting one of radio
button say r1.
the second button when clicked displays another
child dialog with 2 radio buttons. out of which iam
selecting one of radio button say R1.
Now when i press the view properties that is third
button i should get the information from these
selected radio buttons that is r1 and R1 and get it
displayed in new dialog box.
iam able to display third dialog box , but
unable to retrieve info from the 2 radio buttons which
are in 2 dialog boxes.
now the problem is how to retrieve
information from the 2 dialogs and display it in the
third dialog.
So Reply me as soon as possible
Thanks in Advance,
Abhijeet Jadhav
|
|
|
|
|
The best way to do that is something like that:
Say your main dialog is CMainDlg, and your three other dialogs are CDialog1, CDialog2 and CDialog3
void CMainDlg::OnButton1()<br />
{<br />
CDialog1 Dlg;<br />
Dlg.DoModal();<br />
<br />
RadioStatus1 = Dlg.GetRadioStatus();<br />
The same thing for Button2 (retrieving RadioStatus2 from CDialog2
void CMainDlg::OnButton3()<br />
{<br />
CDialog3 Dlg;<br />
Dlg.SetRadioStatus(RadioStatus1, RadioStatus2);<br />
Dlg.DoModal();<br />
}
So, a quick explanation: RadioStatus1 and RadioStatus2 are member variables from your main dialog that will hold the status of the two radio buttons. In the CDialog1 and CDialog2 classes, you must add a handler function for the OnOk event (or when the dialog closes) to retrieve the status of the radio button and save it in a member variable of this class. Then add the member function GetRadioStatus that will return this value.
Finally, for the third dialog, you must add a function that will send the values of the buttons to this dialog before calling DoModal.
Ok, this is just an example of how to do it. Hope this is clear enough...
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot cedric ...for this information
this solves my problem...in case of any doubt, i will ask you later....
Abhijeet Jadhav
|
|
|
|
|
abhi_code wrote:
So Reply me as soon as possible
How unusual, someone in a hurry....
You pass the values on to the third dialog, and expose them in the second dialog using a get method, and variables that you set in the dialog class in the OnClose method, as the radio buttons won't exist once the dialog is closed.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Christian for the information
Abhijeet Jadhav
|
|
|
|
|
I have a little problem with the assignement operator and inheritance. How does this work:
class CBaseClass{
int m_intB;
const CBaseClass& operator=(const CBaseCase& b);
}
class CDerivedClass : public CBaseClass{
int m_intD;
const CDerivedClass& operator=(const CDerivedClass& d);
}
Both assignement operators are defined like this
const CBaseClass& CBaseClass::operator=(const CBaseClass& b){
m_intB=b.m_intB;
return *this;
}
Subsequently
CDerivedClass* a_obj=new CDerivedClass;
a_obj.m_intB=5;
a_obj.m_intD=6;
CDerivedClass* b_obj=new CDerivedClass;
If I do
*b_obj=*a_obj;
only the CBaseClass member is assigned.
Is it possible to make the assignement operator virtual?
Regards, Haakon S.
A sure cure for seasickness is to sit under a tree.
Spike Milligan
|
|
|
|
|
Oops, a small error.
The statements:
a_obj.m_intB=5;
a_obj.m_intD=6;
shall of course be:
a_obj->m_intB=5;
a_obj->m_intD=6;
Haakon S.
A sure cure for seasickness is to sit under a tree.
Spike Milligan
|
|
|
|
|
Haakon S. wrote:
only the CBaseClass member is assigned
I would have thought only the CDerivedClass member would be assigned
What I would do is call the base class operator= from the derived class operator= to assign the base class members
const CDerivedClass& CDerivedClass::operator =(const CDerivedClass &d)
{
*(CBaseClass *)this = (CBaseClass &)d;
m_intD = d.m_intD;
return *this;
}
"You're obviously a superstar." - Christian Graus about me - 12 Feb '03
"Obviously ??? You're definitely a superstar!!!" mYkel - 21 Jun '04
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
Honoured as one of The Most Helpful Members of 2004
|
|
|
|
|
PJ Arends wrote:
I would have thought only the CDerivedClass member would be assigned
No, actually this assignes values for the base class:
*b_obj=*a_obj;
To assign values for the derived class I have to write:
*(CDerivedClass*)b_obj=*(CDerivedClass*)a_obj;
This is what is puzzling me. This is happening even if the type is CDerivedClass for both objects
Regards, Haakon.
A sure cure for seasickness is to sit under a tree.
Spike Milligan
|
|
|
|
|
That is truely wierd
You have to type cast a CDerivedClass pointer to a CDerivedClass pointer to call a CDerivedClass member function?!?
There is obviously something else going on that you have not posted here. Have you tried doing a "Rebuild All"?
"You're obviously a superstar." - Christian Graus about me - 12 Feb '03
"Obviously ??? You're definitely a superstar!!!" mYkel - 21 Jun '04
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
Honoured as one of The Most Helpful Members of 2004
|
|
|
|
|
PJ Arends wrote:
Have you tried doing a "Rebuild All"?
Oh, yes. I have rebuilt many times, and the behaviour is definitively as described.
This is confusing, and I can't find any documentation about it. Which is frustrating.
Regards, Haakon S.
A sure cure for seasickness is to sit under a tree.
Spike Milligan
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, got it now.
The pointers are declared as CBaseClass pointers initially, but I've tried to cast them to CDerivedClass pointers permanently. That appears to have failed. Then it makes sence:
*pBaseB=*pBaseA;
will assign values for base class, where:
*(CDerivedClass*)pBaseB=*(CDerivedClass*)pBaseA;
will assign values for the derived class.
Regards, Haakon S.
|
|
|
|
|
Your derived class's operator = must call the base class's operator =. Something like
class Derived : public Base
{
int m_intD;
public:
const Derived & operator=(const Derived &obj)
{
Base::operator =(obj);
m_intD = obj.m_intD;
return *this;
}
};
Yes, operators can be virtual but their arguments need to match perfectly. If Base's operator = takes const Base &, then Derived's operator = must also take const Base &. You'd have to do a dynamic_cast to see whether it actually is a Derived instance.
Regards
Senthil
_____________________________
My Blog | My Articles | WinMacro
|
|
|
|
|
the source code of Cadlib for creating dxf is not downloading. i need it in my project so please help me to fix this problem or tell me any method of importing a dxf file in my project.
looking forward for ur positive response
thanking u
saqib sohail
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
First of all, I am not sure if this is the right forum to ask this question but I know that this is the most-likely forum where I can get answer to this 
I want to host a Managed form in an Unmanaged host(MFC's MDI window). I have been able to host a Manged Control in Unamanged MDI Window(I did this by overriding COleControlSite's CreateControl Method), but I haven't been able to do so with a Form. What I have observed is that there are some interfaces which a Managed WinForm doesnot implement and which are needed to get it hosted in the Unmanaged View. One solution which I have come up with is to implement those interfaces myself but I know this is not a good solution. Can anyone show me some pointers towards the solution of this problem.
Regards,
Aamir
Einstein: "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
Aamir Butt wrote:
One solution which I have come up with is to implement those interfaces myself but I know this is not a good solution.
That's probably the best solution.
Ryan "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"
|
|
|
|
|
how to make setup in visual c++
|
|
|
|
|
|
how do i create a pop up message near the right hand corner of the task bar. by pop up message i mean that the box displaying the message should come up on its own as well as disappear on its own. also i want to implement it without using MFC. how do i do?
kindly help
|
|
|
|
|
I know I've seen articles here on that subject, search for "(taskbar OR tray) notification window" or something like that. (BTW, MS calls that style of popup "toast", like toast popping up from the toaster.  )
--Mike--
Visual C++ MVP
LINKS~! Ericahist | 1ClickPicGrabber | CP SearchBar v2.0.2 | C++ Forum FAQ
Strange things are afoot at the U+004B U+20DD
|
|
|
|
|
maybe this will help you.
"Go as far as you can see,and when you get there you’ll see further" - Unknown
|
|
|
|
|
No. i want an non MFC based application. can u provide me with some help
|
|
|
|
|
MFC is a thin wrapper around the windows API. The article provides the how-to of the question you asked, you just have to strip out the MFC stuff to get the API stuff you want.
"You're obviously a superstar." - Christian Graus about me - 12 Feb '03
"Obviously ??? You're definitely a superstar!!!" mYkel - 21 Jun '04
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
Honoured as one of The Most Helpful Members of 2004
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
