|
The NavigateError event will be raised whenever the browser has some sort of error. If you timeout, the event will be raised and the messagebox will say your "Content server cannot be found" error.
Hopefully that'll help!
-llamaindustries
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, simple solution...the implimentation escaped me. :P Here's the updated version...
private void item_DoubleClick(object sender, System.EventArgs e)<br />
{<br />
Node selNode = this.item.SelectedNode;<br />
if (selNode != null)<br />
{<br />
<br />
Tag tag = (Tag)selNode.Tag;<br />
if (tag.type == TYPE.FILE)<br />
{<br />
string url = tag.url;<br />
<br />
if (url != "")<br />
{<br />
Shell shell = (Shell)this.ParentForm;<br />
<br />
shell.WB.NavigateError += new AxSHDocVw.DWebBrowserEvents2_NavigateErrorEventHandler(WB_NavigateError);<br />
<br />
Object nobj=null;<br />
string urlval=url;<br />
<br />
shell.WB.Navigate(url,ref nobj,ref nobj,ref nobj,ref nobj);<br />
if (shell.RTC!=null)<br />
{<br />
shell.RTC.SendMsg("URL:" + urlval);<br />
}<br />
}<br />
}<br />
}<br />
}<br />
<br />
private void WB_NavigateError(object sender, AxSHDocVw.DWebBrowserEvents2_NavigateErrorEvent e)<br />
{<br />
Console.WriteLine("CANNOT NAVIGATE");<br />
}<br />
~rcurrie
|
|
|
|
|
Does anybody know a regex expression to find every 3rd comma in a string? In other words I need a regex to find every nth character in a string.
/\ |_ E X E GG
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, you need to consume two commas before grouping a match on the third.
[^,]*,[^,]*,[^,]*(,) does it. It finds anything that's not a comma, the grabs the comma, three times. The third time is caught in a group.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
|
|
|
|
|
This seems to be working but, not exactly how I need. Firstly thank you. Secondly, can you make it so it dosn't do that grouping thing. I'm using "Expresso Code Project Edition" a free regex utility on code project. Now if I put your expression in and run it against the string Day,Amount,Direction,3,100,West,5,43,North,5,44,NorthWest,7,54,South,2,5995,East,,,,,,,,,,54,35345,,,543,North,6,,West It does some weird grouping thing and when I hit the replace button with ";" as the replacment string, results don't come out right. Can you please take a look at when I'm saying by trying it in Expresso.
I want the string after replace to look like this
Day,Amount,Direction;3,100,West;5,43,North;5,44,NorthWest;7,54,South;2,5995,East;,,;,,;,,;,,,;,54,;35345,;,;,;543,North;6,,West (I got lazy, every 3rd comma should be a ";")
/\ |_ E X E GG
|
|
|
|
|
OK, you want to match this:
([^,]*,[^,]*,[^,]*),
This groups everything but the third comma, and just consumes the third comma. Replace it with this
$1;
This means grab the first group ( which is everything but the third comma ), and put a ; after it. This works in Expresso.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
|
|
|
|
|
This works great. There is supposed to be a space between the "NorthWest" and so I put one in and your expession still works properly. Thanks.
/\ |_ E X E GG
|
|
|
|
|
One more quick regex question. Do you think it would be possible to do a regex on this string
| Day | Amount | Direction | 3 | 100 | West | 5 | 43 | North | 5 | 44 | North West | 7 | 54 | South | 2 | 5995 | East | | | | | | | | | | 54 | 35345 | | | 543 | North | 6 | | West
and turn it into this string?
Day,Amount,Direction;3,100,West;5,43,North;5,44,North West;7,54,South;2,5995,East;,,;,,;,,;54,35345,;,543,North;6,,West
So, bascially the same thing you did on the other string, except with |'s with 1 space on each side...
If you don't want to actually work out the regex for this on that's fine (but I wouldn't mind!), but could you tell me if it's a good candidate for a regex?
/\ |_ E X E GG
|
|
|
|
|
Definately a good candidate. Something like ([^|])|([^|])|([^|])| changing to $1, $2, $3;
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
|
|
|
|
|
Hey all,
I'm trying to set a beep(or any other non-threating noise) to sound when the users selects a node.
I've already used
[DllImport("kernel32.dll")]<br />
private static extern bool Beep(int freq, int dur);
but it doesn't make the sound i want, and since it is based on the kernel it has that rickety bios sound to it,
so anyways is there any way to get use of the windows sound schema like you could in vb, I've found the use of Microsoft.VisualBasic.Beep() but C# doesn't like the .Beep() stating that it isn't part of the Microsoft namespace, import am i missing? could i just as well use Microsoft.CSharp.Beep(); ? btw, I get the same namespace error...
Any better ideas?
Dim Beautiful As String
Beautiful = "ignorant"
Label1.Text = "The world is full of " & Beautiful & " people."
Why is common sense such an un-common comodity?
|
|
|
|
|
I think you have to use MessageBeep from User32.
I copied this from the Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace:
Public Shared Sub Beep()
Try
New UIPermission(UIPermissionWindow.SafeSubWindows).Demand
Catch exception1 As Exception
Try
New UIPermission(UIPermissionWindow.SafeTopLevelWindows).Demand
Catch exception2 As Exception
Return
End Try
End Try
UnsafeNativeMethods.MessageBeep(0)
End Sub
<DllImport("user32", CharSet:=CharSet.Unicode)> _
Friend Shared Function MessageBeep(ByVal uType As Integer) As Integer
End Function
'You can make different sounds my passing one of these to uType:
Public Const MB_ICONASTERISK As Integer = 64
Public Const MB_ICONEXCLAMATION As Integer = 48
Public Const MB_ICONHAND As Integer = 16
Public Const MB_ICONQUESTION As Integer = 32
Public Const MB_OK As Integer = 0 'Default
Sorry i can't make C# of it, i'm a wreck at that...
"..Commit yourself to quality from day one..it's better to do nothing at all than to do something badly.."
-- Mark McCormick
|
|
|
|
|
I have tried to use a Session Variable and a string that is going to be the body of a outlook email. I want to product line spaces in the body of the email. I have used the \n but it is not causing a new line, it is just adding a space.
Wanted to know if there is a way to cause a new line in outlook. My code is below:
string comment = "NEW INFORMATION " + txtComment.Text + "\n" + "\n" + "LOG INFORMATION " + txtLog.Text;
Thank You
Scott Moore
|
|
|
|
|
What is the format of the email? If it is html, then use <br> or <p>.
Matt Gerrans
|
|
|
|
|
I wanted to stay away from HTML. To get the information into the body of the email I am just passing it a string of information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tried that with no luck. I do not think that the body of the email reads the line spaces and carriage returns that are produced by the environment new line. When I look at the string I am passing the information to in the quickwatch, the \n and \r shows up, but when it is outputted to the body of the email, there is no added spaces.
|
|
|
|
|
Just a quickie for many thanks;
In a for loop I can get my current index quit easy;
for (int i=0; i<8; ++i)<br />
Console.WriteLine("Current index = "+i);
But with a foreach statement it's different. I only know this ugly way;
<br />
int i=0;<br />
foreach (int curInt in intCollection)<br />
{<br />
Console.WriteLine("Current index = "+i);<br />
i++;<br />
}<br />
Maybe I'm asking the impossible because foreach is for collections so it doesn't have a strict index. But Maybe there's an index keyword? Couldn't find it at the MSDN C# site.
|
|
|
|
|
And you won't find any. The ugly way is the only way to do it.
"God doesn't play dice" - Albert Einstein
"God not only plays dice, He sometimes throws the dices where they cannot be seen" - Niels Bohr
|
|
|
|
|
Ow well that's to bad. Is there any reason to use a foreach instead off a for loop?
My objections for using a foreach are;
- 'Ugly' indexing, as stated above
- Collection can't be modified while foreach-ing the collection.
|
|
|
|
|
Use a for loop if you need indexing. Use foreach if you don't need indexing and you like syntax candy.
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit.
I'm currently blogging about: Homosexuality in Christianity
Judah Himango
|
|
|
|
|
It isn't about whether you "like syntax candy," it is about whether you like writing quality code. See Jan Larsen's reply for more insight.
Matt Gerrans
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not against using foreach, I use it quite a lot in my code. I just don't agree that 'foreach' is quality where 'for' is not. Both are easily recognizable by any novice programmer. As I said to the origin poster, if you need an index, you might as well be using for instead of foreach.
The IEnumerable idea is cool, and gets even better with C# 2.0's iterators with the yield keyword (allowing you to, basically, write co-routines). Coupled with foreach, it is really great. That doesn't mean we should never use the 'for' keyword.
My 'syntax candy' statement wasn't meant to belittle IEnumerable or foreach keyword; I'm merely saying that it is a simple syntax expression that does a lot under the hood (initialize an Enumerator, call the appropriate method calls each loop, and return the next object in the enumeration). You could call your own GetNext() and other appropriate IEnumerator functions yourself, 'foreach' is syntax candy that allows you to forgo typing all that.
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit.
I'm currently blogging about: Homosexuality in Christianity
Judah Himango
|
|
|
|
|
Judah Himango wrote:
My 'syntax candy' statement wasn't meant to belittle IEnumerable or foreach keyword; I'm merely saying that it is a simple syntax expression that does a lot under the hood (initialize an Enumerator, call the appropriate method calls each loop, and return the next object in the enumeration). You could call your own GetNext() and other appropriate IEnumerator functions yourself, 'foreach' is syntax candy that allows you to forgo typing all that.
Basically, that's what high level languages are all about  , I've done my share of Java programming, and I can assure you that I don't miss this:
for (Iterator i = myList.iterator(); i.hasNext();)
{
String tmp = (String) i.next();
}
I'd rather do this:
foreach(String tmp in myList)
{
}
Eye candy maybe, but much clearer, and I guess the ease of use, has got more inexperienced programmers to use the correct iterating technique.
I'm not joking, I've had colleques that would use this on a linked list:
for (int i = 0; i < myList.size(); i++)
{
String tmp = (String) myList.get(i);
}
"God doesn't play dice" - Albert Einstein
"God not only plays dice, He sometimes throws the dices where they cannot be seen" - Niels Bohr
|
|
|
|
|
foreach is great when you're abstracting your code. Indexing is purely for lists, and if you're doing a foreach on an IEnumerable, then you're always sure to get the maximum performance. Consider the performance issues on indexing eg. a linked list or a binary tree.
I'm always declaring my collection member variables as the lowest denominator. Eg. if I need a map, then I'm declaring an IDictionary, and when I'm iterating through the elements, I'll use a foreach loop.
This means that if I am to use a counter, then I have to do it the ugly way.
"God doesn't play dice" - Albert Einstein
"God not only plays dice, He sometimes throws the dices where they cannot be seen" - Niels Bohr
|
|
|
|
|
You can use IndexOf property of the collection you use, but since you're using foreach, there's no reason to think about indexes.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
