C / C++ / MFC

FirstPrevNext

Re: Convert .OBJ -> .LIB alex.barylski4-Mar-02 15:25 alex.barylski 4-Mar-02 15:25  I didn't even know of a conversion utility that did this...? I would specify Win32 static library in the New dialog. This tells vc++ that the output of compilation will be a lib file rather than executable. Cheers! "An expert is someone who has made all the mistakes in his or her field" - Niels Bohr Re: Convert .OBJ -> .LIB 4-Mar-02 15:35 4-Mar-02 15:35  Thanks for you reply. My situation is that the .obj file is not produced by myself. it's a commercial package which i must include into my project. This package, actually, is not big at all, it's only 28KB. however, I only user no more than 3 function in the package, Therefore, convert this .obj to .lib do reduce the size of my application. Cheers. Re: Convert .OBJ -> .LIB Nish Nishant4-Mar-02 15:32 Nish Nishant 4-Mar-02 15:32  You cannot convert just about any obj file to lib!!! Nish It's seven o'clock On the dot I'm in my drop top Cruisin' the streets - Oh yeah I got a real pretty, pretty little thing that's waiting for me Re: Convert .OBJ -> .LIB 4-Mar-02 16:03 4-Mar-02 16:03  I think he's looking for the lib utility. You can use this to combine object files into a static library. Its been a long time since I've created a static library for anything. Re: Convert .OBJ -> .LIB alex.barylski4-Mar-02 17:30 alex.barylski 4-Mar-02 17:30  Nish [BusterBoy] wrote: You cannot convert just about any obj file to lib!!! Huh...Nish i'm missing something here... Just about doesn't seem right...if i'm wrong correct me...if i'm right tell me too...cuz i'm gonna finally tease you about yer English. Out of pure jealousy (spelling) of your grammer being better than mine of course. Hooo...i'm getting excited...am I right...? Laterz! "An expert is someone who has made all the mistakes in his or her field" - Niels Bohr Re: Convert .OBJ -> .LIB Nish Nishant4-Mar-02 17:49 Nish Nishant 4-Mar-02 17:49  HockeyDude wrote: Out of pure jealousy (spelling) of your grammer being better than mine It's spelt "grammar" and not "grammer" My sentence :- You cannot convert just about any obj file to lib!!! This means you cannot take any random obj file and convert it to a lib file. "just about" is a phrase. http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=just%20about Nish It's seven o'clock On the dot I'm in my drop top Cruisin' the streets - Oh yeah I got a real pretty, pretty little thing that's waiting for me Re: Convert .OBJ -> .LIB Nish Nishant4-Mar-02 17:51 Nish Nishant 4-Mar-02 17:51  Nish [BusterBoy] wrote: "just about" is a phrase. Actually it's an idiom Nish It's seven o'clock On the dot I'm in my drop top Cruisin' the streets - Oh yeah I got a real pretty, pretty little thing that's waiting for me Re: Convert .OBJ -> .LIB alex.barylski4-Mar-02 17:58 alex.barylski 4-Mar-02 17:58  Damn it Nish... I'll catch you one day... See you have the benefit (i don't really know, but i'll assume) of not learning english in quite the same setting as me. When I speak it's full of normal slang, Sooo sometimes proper grammer or pronounciation doesn't seem right to me, cuz well...it's the only language I know and I like my enlgish...not websters or whoever...Plus I speak Canadian English eh!!! For instance...in Canada Color is Color not Colour...like I think the Brits or Americans spell it. Actually I may have that backwards... So yeah...ummm...thats my excuse for lack of literacy...or whatever it is... Perhaps we should all communicate using a hybrid..??? of C++ or something... if(Nish) AfxMessageBox("Whats up?"); else AfxMessageBox("Are you there..?"); This way there would be no correcting, cuz the compiler would catch your gramm(er) mistakes before sending out...? Cheers man! "An expert is someone who has made all the mistakes in his or her field" - Niels Bohr Re: Convert .OBJ -> .LIB Nish Nishant4-Mar-02 18:22 Nish Nishant 4-Mar-02 18:22  Actually I learned english by speaking english too. In school we had to use english compulsorily. It wasn't easy doing that when you are 4 or 5 years old and you dont know the language except for that apple-ball-cat stuff the teacher shows you on the board. But then you catch up and by the time you are 8, you can speak the language well enough to insult someone's grandparents without using any explicitly abusive words. Nish It's seven o'clock On the dot I'm in my drop top Cruisin' the streets - Oh yeah I got a real pretty, pretty little thing that's waiting for me Re: Convert .OBJ -> .LIB alex.barylski4-Mar-02 22:35 alex.barylski 4-Mar-02 22:35  English is pretty popular. Yeah I insulted grandparents too, but not with English...I used the filipino I picked up from friends. They never knew what I was saying. Memories....!!! "An expert is someone who has made all the mistakes in his or her field" - Niels Bohr Re: Convert .OBJ -> .LIB (yes you can) Tim Smith4-Mar-02 16:10 Tim Smith 4-Mar-02 16:10  lib name.obj Will create name.lib. lib name.obj /out:othername.lib Will create othername.lib HOWEVER, it won't do you any good. Object files in libraries are included as a unit. It won't pick routines out of the object file. Tim Smith I know what you're thinking punk, you're thinking did he spell check this document? Well, to tell you the truth I kinda forgot myself in all this excitement. But being this here's CodeProject, the most powerful forums in the world and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question, Do I feel lucky? Well do ya punk? Re: Convert .OBJ -> .LIB (yes you can) alex.barylski4-Mar-02 17:32 alex.barylski 4-Mar-02 17:32  Cool...I did not know you could do that... Thanx! "An expert is someone who has made all the mistakes in his or her field" - Niels Bohr Re: Convert .OBJ -> .LIB (yes you can) 4-Mar-02 19:01 4-Mar-02 19:01  Tim Smith, Thank you so much. How to restart DHCP Ola Carlsson4-Mar-02 11:54 Ola Carlsson 4-Mar-02 11:54  Hi All! Does somebody know how to restart DHCP? Thanks, Ola Carlsson Re: How to restart DHCP Matt Newman4-Mar-02 14:55 Matt Newman 4-Mar-02 14:55  On what? - Matt Newman -Sonork ID: 100.11179:BestSnowman Frankly AOL should stick to what it does best: Fooling millions of americans into believing that it, AOL, is the web. -Paul Watson Re: How to restart DHCP Jeremy Falcon4-Mar-02 16:18 Jeremy Falcon 4-Mar-02 16:18  I'm assuming your talking about an NT-based machine? Use the command line... C:\>net stop dhcp C:\>net start dhcp You can do this behind-the-scenes from a program. Just remember you won't get control back until the statement finishes executing (in the same thread that is). If you are looking for something different, please give more details. Jeremy L. Falcon "The One Who Said, 'The One Who Said...'" Re: How to restart DHCP Josh Knox (disabled)4-Mar-02 17:24 Josh Knox (disabled) 4-Mar-02 17:24  At a Command Prompt, enter the following: ipconfig /release_all ipconfig /renew_all Josh Knox that-guy.net "Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away, and you have their shoes." - author unknown Re: How to restart DHCP Ola Carlsson4-Mar-02 20:22 Ola Carlsson 4-Mar-02 20:22  Should work on Win98, ME, 2000 and XP /Ola DirectX or OpenGL? moliate4-Mar-02 10:54 moliate 4-Mar-02 10:54  I have recently started learning some more computer graphics (mostly 2D) for my hobby projects. My question is if I should dig deeper into DirectX or OpenGL? DirectX has better performance (on MS platforms), but is more complex. OpenGL has the advantage of better portability, but lack some of the bells and whistles of DirectX. Are these observations correct, and which do you suggest for learning? Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks /moliate Re: DirectX or OpenGL? Rick York4-Mar-02 16:21 Rick York 4-Mar-02 16:21  This article at GameDev is about this exact topic. My personal view is that OpenGL is not lacking in performance or capabilities (refer to Quake3) and is a bit simpler to use but I have not done any significant programming with DX. Given the large volume of samples and tutorials on OpenGL I think it would probably be better to learn with initially. Re: DirectX or OpenGL? moliate4-Mar-02 17:02 moliate 4-Mar-02 17:02  Thanks for the article! Must admit that the bulk of code required to write even the simplest DirectX app was getting me down, but I thought it was the way to do it on MS platforms. I'll take a furter look at OpenGL... /moliate How to get COM interface of an ActiveX control? Aaron Schaefer4-Mar-02 10:47 Aaron Schaefer 4-Mar-02 10:47  Hi All, I am wondering how to get the actual COM interface (let's say ISpeedometer) of an ActiveX control on a dialog in MFC. In ATL, you can do this pretty easily with GetDialogControl, which will give you a pointer to IUknown of the control, which can be queried for the more derived interface of interest. I assume there must be a way to do something like this in MFC. I am trying to get arond the generic wrapper class generated by class wizard which just gets to all of a control's functionality through its IDispatch interface. Thanks, Aaron Re: How to get COM interface of an ActiveX control? Tomasz Sowinski4-Mar-02 10:50 Tomasz Sowinski 4-Mar-02 10:50  So you have IDispatch? Why don't you QueryInterface for ISpeedometer? Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com Re: How to get COM interface of an ActiveX control? Aaron Schaefer5-Mar-02 2:57 Aaron Schaefer 5-Mar-02 2:57  No, I don't have any interfaces. Just the ID of the control on the dialog resource. So I need to get an interface, any interface. I figured out how to do this using CWnd::GetControlUnknown, which gave me IUnknown for the ActiveX control, from which I can query for more specific interfaces. Thanks, Aaron Efficiency issues from VC++6.0 to VC++.NET myenigmaself4-Mar-02 9:50 myenigmaself 4-Mar-02 9:50  I recently ported an old VC++ program from 6.0 to .NET. There were a few issues to begin with, but the only thing that I've changed in the product is that I'm using the Shared DLL option to reference MFC now instead of Static Library. The program builds fine and runs, but when I perform pointer intensive operations the performance in .NET is horrible. We're talking an order of magnitude here. Execution that takes 2 seconds in 6.0 takes 30 seconds in .NET. I've tried all the optimizations I can think of but none of them did anything to increase performance. Should I just stick to 6.0 for now? Why is it so slow? It's unmanaged code so I don't think GC would be affecting performance at all. It seems like it is though. What's the deal? Any input is appreciated. myenigmaself http://myenigmaself.gaiden.com myenigmaself@yahoo.com "If debugging is the process of removing bugs from code, programming must be the process of putting them in."~~Dykstra

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 23-Sep-24 4:29 Refresh ᐊ Prev1...17362173631736417365173661736717368173691737017371 Next ᐅ

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.