|
FindFirstFile and FindNextFile
Nish
[Signature temporarily down]
|
|
|
|
|
Check CFindFile
Mazy
"So,so you think you can tell,
Heaven from Hell,
Blue skies from pain,...
How I wish,how I wish you were here."
Wish You Were Here-Pink Floyd-1975
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have several Spinbuttons attached to Multiline Editboxes. Multiline
because I want my text right aligned on different platforms.
The problem is that I don't catch the EN_CHANGE event anymore
when I use the Spinbuttons. This only works with the Singleline property.
I just want to enable a button when something in the Editboxes change!
Thanks,
Arjan.
|
|
|
|
|
Does anybody know why a class copy constructor gets ignored by compiler when objects of the class get passed to a function with unspecified number of arguments ?
The following code illustrates this. When the test runs, the output is 2 1 2 3 4, whereas I would expect 2 0 0 0 0. Please ignore the awfulness of the implementation of the MyClass::Foo function – it is just to prove that the compiler has passed the objects by value using the default copy constructor where as the class contains user-defined copy constructor.
Thanks,
Serge
#include "stdafx.h"
class MyClass
{
public:
MyClass(int first, int second) : a(first), b(second) {}
MyClass(const MyClass& r) : a(0), b(0) {}
void Foo(int arg, ...)
{
int* pArg = &arg;
printf("%i %i %i %i %i\n", arg, *(pArg + 1), *(pArg + 2), *(pArg + 3), *(pArg + 4));
}
private:
int a, b;
};
void main()
{
MyClass mc1(1, 2);
MyClass mc2(3, 4);
mc1.Foo(2, mc1, mc2);
}
|
|
|
|
|
According to the standard (§ 5.2.2 Function call), arguments passed in the ... part of the argument list must be either primitive (arithmetic types, pointers) or POD-structs. A POD-struct is a class that behaves as a simple aggregate of data, with no user-defined constructors (you can think of POD-structs as classes where it is permissible to do bitwise copy between objects). So you're entering the realm of undefined behavior in your program.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
|
|
|
|
|
Your copy constructor is not being called. The reason for this can be found in the partial disassembly of the line
mc1.Foo(2, mc1, mc2);
31: mc1.Foo(2, mc1, mc2);
00401090 mov eax,dword ptr [ebp-0Ch] ---->points to mc2.b and loads it to eax
00401093 push eax ----->push value to stack for function
00401094 mov ecx,dword ptr [ebp-10h] ---->points to mc2.a and loads it to eax
00401097 push ecx ----->push value to stack for function
00401098 mov edx,dword ptr [ebp-4] ---->points to mc1.b and loads it to eax
0040109B push edx ----->push value to stack for function
0040109C mov eax,dword ptr [ebp-8] ---->points to mc1.a and loads it to eax
0040109F push eax ----->push value to stack for function
004010A0 push 2 ----->This is the first arg
004010A2 lea ecx,[ebp-8]
004010A5 push ecx
004010A6 call @ILT+0(MyClass::Foo) (00401005)
004010AB add esp,18h
This seems to be compiler optimization if I am not mistaken. However if you write
MyClass mc2(mc1); then the value of mc2 members a & b are 0 i.e. your copy constructor is called.
Atul
Sonork 100.13714 netdiva
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the answers, now it’s clear. As the disassembly shows, the compiler generated ‘default copy constructor’ and ignored the user-defined copy constructor. Surely, in this situation, the compiler must warn about what it is doing? Interesting, what the standard says about user defined copy constructors. Does it mention that copy constructors are not applicable in some cases? And how many case are there ?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm writing a MIDI program that will write something on an Edit control of dialog whenever there is a MIDI message input.
The callback function for handling MIDI input event needs to be either global or a static member function of such a dialog class. How can I make the callback function calls a member function of that dialog class ? (in order to change the text in the Edit control).
I have tried to make a global pointer and sets it to point to CMainFrame objects in order to access levels of members down to the dialog object. But this causes an invalid page fault in module MFC42D.DLL
Any suggestion will be highly appreciated.
T. Tanprasert (T_Tanprasert@yahoo.com)
|
|
|
|
|
this?
http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/callback_adapter.asp
t!
|
|
|
|
|
|
If I want to draw a picture (ownerdraw buttun) on a button, how can I do så that picture won't be "deleted". I mean I've tried pressing another button that painted a line on another. but when I drag the dialog outside the screen the line dissapeard. Thats ofcourse... but how to keep it there so not my WM_PAINT steal my line or picture?
Hope you understand me!
------------------------------------
Rickard Andersson, Suza Computing
ICQ#: 50302279
I'm from the winter country SWEDEN!
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
The draw message the button gets should always redraw, the same way that WM_PAINT always does. How are you handling the drawing of the button ?
Christian
The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little.
"I'm thinking of getting married for companionship and so I have someone to cook and clean." - Martin Marvinski, 6/3/2002
|
|
|
|
|
Is it a Big deal to do that stuff ??
See my problem is our Art director has given me a task to create a fancy shaped toolbar which is a mixture of Office2K type Flat toolbars and Mac os type round edges etc.
I tried to study some of the very good toolbar classes available on CodeProject, but it seems that I can Draw only within the buttons area. not on the edges or Title bar of the toolbar(when its floating) so I need some guidance of how to go about this kind of a stuff.
Gurus please guide me .. I dont mind working hard to write a Toolbar class from the scratch.
Abhishek Narula
"Learn to appreciate others ... World would appreciate you"
|
|
|
|
|
The NCPAINT message lets you draw around the edges. If you decide to roll your own, look through the MFC source first to see how it all works.
Christian
The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little.
"I'm thinking of getting married for companionship and so I have someone to cook and clean." - Martin Marvinski, 6/3/2002
|
|
|
|
|
Ya I am trying to do some drawing in NCPAINT handler ...
But some how I am not able to draw in the full rectangle ..
Just look at the following code and please what is wrong in the code..
CWindowDC cpDC (this);
CRect rcClip;
GetClientRect(&rcClip);
cpDC.FillSolidRect (rcClip,RGB(255,0,0));
the above code does not fill the full rectangle , it still leaves so many margins ..
Also please tell me the differnce between GetWindowRect and GetClientRect ..
Thank you very much
Abhishek Narula
"Learn to appreciate others ... World would appreciate you"
|
|
|
|
|
1 - GetClientRect is the problem
2 - GetWindowRect gets the whole window area, usually in screen coordinates ( i.e. relative to the top left ), and GetClientRect gets the client area only ( the bit you can draw in OnPaint ).
Christian
The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little.
"I'm thinking of getting married for companionship and so I have someone to cook and clean." - Martin Marvinski, 6/3/2002
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot you have been a great help.
Abhishek Narula
"Learn to appreciate others ... World would appreciate you"
|
|
|
|
|
I have standart generated by ClassWizard SDI MFC-app. I want that some operation invoked by user that may be performed a while was displayed like dialog with progress bar and "Cancel" button. And while it's displaying, operation should performs, progress bar should displays appropriate value and so on till operation has been completed or user has clicked "Cancel"
What's the easiest way to implement that. After searching through MSDN some implementation approach has appeared but it's so difficult.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
It depends on what the process is. If it's under your control ( i.e. you are working with a set of your own data, using your code ), then a modeless dialog box, with a flag being set by pressing the cancel button, and the flag state checked after each iteration through the process taking place in a loop would be the best way.
If you're formating a hard drive, or some other process not taking place in your code, you'll need a thread.
Christian
The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little.
"I'm thinking of getting married for companionship and so I have someone to cook and clean." - Martin Marvinski, 6/3/2002
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks but I can't understand how can I implement it in MFC way. Would you mind show me the way  My task is first ie I want to operate own data
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
Morozov Alexey wrote:
My task is first ie I want to operate own data
So you don't have a task, you just want to know how to do it ?
CWaitDialog dialog; // A modeless dialog that creates itself in it's constructor
for (int i=0;i<10000000;++i)
{
// do something
if (dialog.bStopNow)
{
// Any necessary cleanup
break;
}
}
is all I had in mind.
Christian
The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little.
"I'm thinking of getting married for companionship and so I have someone to cook and clean." - Martin Marvinski, 6/3/2002
|
|
|
|
|
You could create a new worker thread. This worker thread can do the background stuff and keep updating the progress control. Thus the cancel button on your main window will still be receptive and not frozen as you might be experiencing now.
Nish
The lady in red is dancing with me
Cheek to cheek
There's nobody here
It's just you and me
It's where I wanna be
But I hardly know this beauty by my side
I'll never forget the way you look tonight
|
|
|
|
|
This being the obvious solution, I guessed it may be the 'too hard' solution he found in MSDN.
Christian
The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little.
"I'm thinking of getting married for companionship and so I have someone to cook and clean." - Martin Marvinski, 6/3/2002
|
|
|
|
|
You're about right It's no so hard, but I thought that building new thread, organizing some kind of inter-thread sinchronization is too big to doing such small task. Besides really I have had separate thread that perform that task already. But it's so bulky  That why I decided to ask simplier solution.
|
|
|
|
|
Morozov Alexey wrote:
That why I decided to ask simplier solution.
I have always found that the simpler solutions are often the right solutions. The complicated solutions make you feel nice, but often just ends up in a mess.
KISS is actually true [except for the 2nd 'S']
Nish
The lady in red is dancing with me
Cheek to cheek
There's nobody here
It's just you and me
It's where I wanna be
But I hardly know this beauty by my side
I'll never forget the way you look tonight
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
