|
Our firewall has been reporting a series of DoS attacks which combined with some network hardware failures in the hosting facility has caused us a great deal of pain.
We're doing what we can.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris, thanks for the explanation. In addition to the h/w problem, responsiveness has been deteriorating steadily over at least several months.
codeproject is suggested on various dev related newsgroups, but "thanks, but no thanks" is an increasingly frequent response.
I'm not trying to dig, I just want you to have an accurate picture of reality.
I haven't done any real testing myself, but the note re: DNS sounds plausible. 99% of the many errors I receive navigating to and around codeproject are report as DNS errors.
Good Luck getting everything in order.
|
|
|
|
|
Things are working great today Chris! I hope it's not a fluke!
Thanks for fixing it
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you 100%. It took three tries to open the Codeproject.com home page, and only after waiting a minute and ten seconds. The first two attempts timed out.
Now for some suggested solutions: 1) Pipe Boost (reviewed by Ian Ippolito of PSC (here in Tampa, FL btw) and 2) ASP.NET solution optimized for high volume sites like DNN.
I don't know if Codeproject has considered the Pipe Boost solution reviewed by Ian Ippolito here: http://www.planet-source-code.com/vb/scripts/ShowCode.asp?txtCodeId=7164&lngWId=4[^] but apparently, he loves it. He has some great performance graphs showing performance before & after he utilized the Pipe Boost Solution.
My suggestion, dump the ASP legacy code, and import all your stuff into a DNN based solution. DNN is so much more elegant and is capable of serving any load of users, scaled horizontally across a web farm, whatever. DNN finally has an outstanding forum sub-project (although not quite as cool as this one, it could be). Plus, I am confident all the existing content could be ported to DNN by a relatively small team of properly motivated coders.
My 2cents...
This is a test of the emergency broadcast system. In the event of an actual emergency, this test would have been followed by important news and information. Again, this was only a test.
The Management
|
|
|
|
|
clicking "sign out" doesn't work for me here - I remain signed in.
I have no other terminal to check, and I am behind a proxy, so this might be a local issue.
This is a public terminal - so if you see me asking programming questions in the lounge, it wasn't me
Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering. aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie" boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen
|
|
|
|
|
No problems here. Try to close all browser, then delete Cookies, then check if you are sign in.
If you still have a problem, please tell me what browser do you use
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed that your admin messages have been deleted from thr lounge, at all it kinda annoying in front of all messages, so can you make a separator to separate them ( the admin message and the regular messages ), and please don't delete the message in the C#, and the ASP.NET sections, because really many of the users post there, don't know these rules.
------------------------------ "The Soapbox has been so ..."
|
|
|
|
|
The whole point of admin messages is that they are there to be noticed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furty wrote: Is it kocher to blatantly advertise control libraries in the discussion threads that accompany articles?
I'd say no. Hopefully the editors will purge those messages. Mind you, got to give the guy credit for the most eloquent worded spam.
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
The Spam has been removed and the user's account disabled.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Since there is *always* at least one response that says CListCtrl, I recommend Chris make it an actual option for every survey.
Cheers,
Vikram. "When I read in books about a "base class", I figured this was the class that was at the bottom of the inheritence tree. It's the "base", right? Like the base of a pyramid." - Marc Clifton.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would't take that the fun out of it? Praying the entire weekend that there is an "optional text answer" option, then checking if thre is already a CListCtrl reply, and if not posting one?
Errrm... At least I imagine that...
Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering. aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie" boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen
|
|
|
|
|
Vote yo 5 for the joke. Vote you 1 for the idea.
<italic>Work hard, Work effectively.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm noticing very slow access to the codeproject site, I just wanted to know if anybody else is having the same problems. I'm situated in Paris France and I am using a professional 10Mb fiber optic internet access so this is not a line speed problem. I've done a tracert as follows
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.33.100.223
2 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 195.167.196.226
3 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms FE3-0.7204-1.aub.completel.fr [213.244.1.65]
4 10 ms 9 ms 9 ms pos7-4.gsr2.aub.completel.fr [213.244.1.237]
5 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 213.30.129.69
6 12 ms 9 ms 9 ms 83.ge1-0.er1a.cdg2.fr.above.net [62.4.73.185]
7 114 ms 114 ms 118 ms pos1-0.cr1.cdg2.fr.above.net [64.125.27.109]
8 21 ms 20 ms 21 ms so-4-0-0.cr1.lhr3.uk.above.net [64.125.23.9]
9 93 ms 93 ms 93 ms so-7-0-0.cr1.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.31.186]
10 117 ms 117 ms 117 ms so-6-1-0.cr2.ord2.us.above.net [64.125.27.13]
11 117 ms 117 ms 117 ms so-0-0-0.cr1.ord2.us.above.net [64.125.29.185]
12 167 ms 168 ms 167 ms telus-mfn.ord2.above.net [216.200.254.29]
13 185 ms 184 ms 184 ms eyrkonaedr04.bb.telus.com [154.11.6.89]
14 174 ms 176 ms 176 ms 207.219.30.97
15 186 ms 183 ms 184 ms 207.219.30.13
16 197 ms 195 ms 200 ms 209.171.52.66
17 201 ms 199 ms 217 ms www.codeproject.com [209.171.52.99]
Eddie Gent
|
|
|
|
|
I have had very slow response as well from codeproject this week - more than a minute for any page to load.
Maggie
|
|
|
|
|
First was Managed C++
then it was C++/CLI
I alway see MFC, Win32, C question in C++/CLI
Is this still for MC++ and not for MFC if so, why you vouldn't rename to MC++/CLI or Managed C++/CLI
|
|
|
|
|
|
And what About "Visual C++"
I Also see Win32, MFC qouestion in Visual C++
when i clicked C++/CLI i see:
The Code Project discussion boards - C++/CLI
Discussions on Managed Extensions for Visual C++ .NET
I see world Managed. In that forum they also ask for MFC, Whitch is unmanaged. In that specification i coudn't find word MFC or Win32.
I am asking because i see a lot of people mixing those two forums.
ps: Sorry for my loshe(Rusty) english.
|
|
|
|
|
The Visual C++ forum is supposed to be for general C++ questions (not just questions about VC). C++/CLI is the new name for Managed C++. However, people that don't know what "C++/CLI" is think it's for general C++ questions, so that forum gets a lot of posts that ought to be in the VC forum.
--Mike--
Visual C++ MVP
LINKS~! Ericahist | 1ClickPicGrabber | NEW~! CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ
Kosh reminded me of some of the prima-donna programmers I've worked with. Knew everything but when you asked them a question; never gave you a straight answer.
-- Michael P. Butler in the Lounge
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn wrote: people that don't know what "C++/CLI" is think it's for general C++ questions,
Yeah, I know. I am suggesting to add word Managed in front of "C++/CLI" then the people will go to VC++ forum.
They could rename "Visual C++" to General C++ or something
I don't like to see MFC or any other qouestions in Managed forum, because there are a more qouestion than managed (I Think) and i hate to read the post, because i only want to read Managed post
PS: What Happend to Anonymous?
|
|
|
|
|
Why doesn't the [Sign In] link in a post on the boards take me back to the post after successfully signing in?
Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering. aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie" boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen
|
|
|
|
|
The technical reason is because there are a couple of systems plugged together that have conflicting QueryString keys that cause problems when trying to hookup the redirect back to the original page.
The real reason is that instead of patching the current system I'm just rewriting it so it works properly from the ground up.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|