|
you know, the air is full of radio, TV electromagnetical waves...
mobile phones signal *could* affect human helth, but hey, that's still not proved, and even if it was true, BlueTooth don't use the same frequencies as the phones....
TOXCCT >>> GEII power [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VisualCalc 3.0]
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for your explaination.
|
|
|
|
|
Roath Kanel wrote: Code project forum is the place that is free for people use to research and post a questions or answers. There is not limit
What I meant by that is you're the only person I've ever come acrossed that seems to be so worried about the affects of EM radiation from a device. We're constantly bombarded by it from all kinds of sources, in all frequency ranges and by various levels of power.
The dinosaurs got cancer too, and it's a pretty safe bet that it wasn't from a cell phone!
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: The dinosaurs got cancer too, and it's a pretty safe bet that it wasn't from a cell phone!
you're that old ??
TOXCCT >>> GEII power [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VisualCalc 3.0]
|
|
|
|
|
It feels like it sometimes!
It's just one of those pieces of brain lint I picked up somewhere, probably off the Discovery Channel.
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for your explaination.
|
|
|
|
|
Roath Kanel wrote: Does the bluetooth signal could affect my health or not?
Probably not as much as the cellphone it communicates with, now located dangerously close to your groin...
(i haven't heard any reports of problems - AFAIK, Bluetooth operates at very low power. Of course, if it hurts, stop.)
|
|
|
|
|
Shog9 wrote: Probably not as much as the cellphone it communicates with, now located dangerously close to your groin...
You know.... There may actually be a market for an aluminum foil codpiece!
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for your comment. Until now i could not find any document about the bluetooth signal and the health. But I will try to use it and test it whether it affect my health or not.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I have change the roaming profile to mandatory profile. When i check the profile type is display that the profile is mandatory profile. But when i change this profile to a roaming profile, the label display in profile type still display mandatory profile. Does anybody have an idea to solve this problem?
|
|
|
|
|
Does anybody know if that OS comes with OPK tools? (OEM Preinstallation Kit)
--
Pictures[^] from my Japan trip.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to script IIS on windows 2003 servers with VB.NET ??
I can't seem to find some material on this ...
// Dammark
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there!
I have to set a PATH environment variable in System-Advanced-Environment Variable under Windows XP.
But I have no idea how to make it with an *.bat file.
Is it possible to place the variable in the registry?
|
|
|
|
|
Please, see my reply at this place.
"we must lose precision to make significant statements about complex systems."
-deKorvin on uncertainty
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I have configure group policies in order to set an application automatically to the client after they start their computer. But I found it is the problem that the software would be setup after I set the group policies around 30mn. What I want is: after an administrator apply the group policies of setup a software to each computer client that start PC after the group policies is applied. I also use the command gpupdate/force to refresh the group policies, but it still not working. I have to wait around 45mn in order see an installation to each client.
Does any people have any idea to solve this problem?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure I understand your question.
There is always some degree of latency, because the actual setup does not exist on the client machine, it is only assigned. That means that when each client starts up, it has to first transfer the setup to the local machine from some central network location. Only then does the actual setup run.
If you are starting a lot of clients at the same time maybe what you are seeing is a long delay because of competition for network bandwidth as a large number of clients all try to download the same package????
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for your comment. But in my case, I try to use it in my computer lap which have only 2 computer. One is the client and another one is the server. After I refresh the group policies around the first 20mn, it is not running the setup and the file that I want to setup automatically is the AdminPack.msi which contain around 10MB. What I want is the installation apply to every machine since the time that I apply and refresh the group policies. Because in business environment, time is really valueable. Any idea?
|
|
|
|
|
|
rwestgraham wrote: Have you tried enabling verbose logging to try and troubleshoot the problem?
I didn't try this way yet. But I will try to do it after reading the above link. Thank you very much for your comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, in client/server environemtn, an administrator of the server could delegate any task to any specific user to perform (such as creating a user account) in order to reduce administrative task of the administrator by using delegate control.
In windows xp professional, could the local administrator delegate any control to the (such as create a new user account) to any specific user in order to reduce an administrative task for administrator?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I have 2 computer which is client/server running windows 2000 server and professional in my computer lap. I also configure roaming profile for the user account in active directory. The problem is when i log to the client with any roaming user account and create a file and maked it with encrypted option, when I log off, my profile could not be save to the server. I know that the problem might the file with encryption might have a problem during save itself to the server. Does anyone have any idea to solve this problem? In my opinion, this problem might cause from permission that I set on the folder that use to store user profile. Is this solution is right? Because I think that an encrypted file which create by the owner of the file should be store on the server in order to keep the file private and secure, but why it could not save to the server when the user logoff? Any idea would be appreciate.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I have a local windows xp professional and i create a mandatory profile by changing the file NTUSER.DAT to NTUSER.MAN. I try to make change some setting like dekstop picture and create some file and hope that it won't save any setting. But after i log off and log on again it always save the last setting that I have made to this roaming profile. I have check the profile type and found it display that the profile is the mandatory profile. I don't know that mandatory profile always work with client/server environment or work in local or not? If anybody has any solution please let me know?
|
|
|
|
|
I am about exchanging the hard disk with another one less tired of work (and more storage capacity, of course).
I'd like to preserve the existing installation, i.e. not change anything but the hard disk.
How can this be achieved? This is the fourth time I am doing this, and it is becoming increasingly a life-time job, paid by no-one.
My problems are:
1. the idiots of XP developers decided, that I *have to* format NTFS every disk, which is over 32GB (or whatever),
2. I can not copy a hard disk without losing either the full names, or lots of files.
What is the "standard" procedure when migrating to another hard disk?
|
|
|
|
|
Vancouver wrote: 1. the idiots of XP developers decided, that I *have to* format NTFS every disk, which is over 32GB
If you were thinking of using DOS on it, then yes, you have to abide by that limit.
Vancouver wrote: 2. I can not copy a hard disk without losing either the full names, or lots of files.
Shouldn't happen on an NTFS volume. DOS, or a FAT volume, on the other hand, WILL lose the long file names.
Vancouver wrote: What is the "standard" procedure when migrating to another hard disk?
There really isn't a "standard" process for this. But, a great utility to do this is PowerQuest's DriveImage (which I don't think exists anymore), or Norton's Ghost. It'll copy everything from one drive to another, while correcting for new partition sizes and stuff.
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the idea. Apparently DriveImage is still around; however it costs more than an XP full license (and Norton Ghost costs even more).
Btw, XP's enforcement of NTFS has nothing to do with DOS.
Disk Management simply does not create a partition/logical drive with FAT32 larger than 32GB (even though you can use a much larger FAT32 disk with XP - if it has been created by Win98).
|
|
|
|