|
Hi, all. I'm trying to put a keylogger on my comp, one that would run undetected of course, and I need the log or text file to be automatically e-mailed to me each day. Do you have any suggestions that meet these requirements?
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, noone is going to help with such a project. For very obvious reasons...
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
As in, obviously I shouldn't have any concern what is being done on my computer while I'm gone? There are several keyloggers available, I'm just asking for a recommendation to make a cost-effective decision while keeping my interests secure.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. Because it can be turned around and abused so badly.
I know. I've done it myself and it scared the crap out me how easy it was and what I could see with it. I wrote mine as an exercise in client activated/server objects. When ever the person logged in, a window popped up on my machine and I could see every keystroke, as they typed it!
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am stuck in a situation. Actually i have to make a windows service to gracefully shut down an Application (if any running process gets killed or hanged, then shutdown all the processes gracefully).
This application consists of four processes (running exes). All these four processes are multithreded processes.
Out of the four processes we have code of only two processes which are actually wrapper of the other two.
While other two are third party exe's..
Can you please tell some approach for this situation. The real problem is to gracefully shutdown the proccesses without code.
Plz help !!
Rajni
|
|
|
|
|
I am creating the installer package for MFC app with InstallShield. Now I want while installing the user should not be able to select the subfeatures twice in the Customed installation. He should be able to select the sub feature only once. for the second time he will not be allowed. How can i do that?
|
|
|
|
|
hi to all
I installed one security component on one server. Suppose if any user want to access the core functionality of the main applcations, the user credentials must be passed through this security component. Users belonging to different domains.Again this domains are divided into global and local group users.
For only one domain(assume x), if local group is used , the security component does not work. Global group for this domain is working fine.
what is the expectiong error here?
Is that OS related error or Applcation error?
OS: NT
component p.language: cpp
Expecting a early reply....
Thanks,
Bhasker.P.
from smile world......
|
|
|
|
|
|
i know, i know, i have to stay calm myself, but it seems that i've been seeing this question too much time. yeah, you have no answers, but did you wonder if you were asking the question the right way ? i mean, a way that everybody can understand you ?
well,personnaly, i have no idea of what to do in you case, ,but i have an advice.
did you notice the "little" ( ) sentence when you posted this on this forum ??
<font color=red>Please do NOT post programming questions or ads to this forum.</font>
so, get the [Delete] link at the bottom of your post, and do what you have to do with it.
nothing more for me.
TOXCCT >>> GEII power [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VCalc 3.0 soon...]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yeah, sure, i'm going right now, mister South African...
ps: last thing... when you find someone that answer exactly what you want, please let me know
TOXCCT >>> GEII power [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VCalc 3.0 soon...]
|
|
|
|
|
kelprinc wrote: go back to primary and learn your grammar.
Error: Missing noun between "primary" and "and".
ColinMackay.net
"Man who stand on hill with mouth open will wait long time for roast duck to drop in." -- Confucius
"If a man empties his purse into his head, no man can take it away from him, for an investment in knowledge pays the best interest." -- Joseph E. O'Donnell
|
|
|
|
|
|
kelprinc wrote: You just dont want people to reply me.
Where did he say that?
kelprinc wrote: You are so rough, i wonder which country you come from.
What does his nationality have to do with it? I'm yet to find a country full of jerks or geniuses.
Sorry, I can't* help you with your original question.
* Not because I'm a jerk, but because I don't know myself. I hope you find a solution.
Cheers,
Vikram. "When I read in books about a "base class", I figured this was the class that was at the bottom of the inheritence tree. It's the "base", right? Like the base of a pyramid." - Marc Clifton.
i dont mind to be
a stupid,better than being a moron - Adnan Siddiqi.
|
|
|
|
|
Tell your boss to a) piss off and do it himself or b) point you to an example of where he's seen it done before or c) resign: you're obviously way too dumb to do the job.
turning the other cheek just gets you slapped twice
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because you broke the golden rule, arse-wipe, which leaves you open to as much abuse as we can be bothered to muster.
kelprinc wrote: Watch yourself
I see: and when can I expect you to be flying in to present yourself for further mockery? Will you be accompanied by your mummy or daddy?
turning the other cheek just gets you slapped twice
|
|
|
|
|
No name-calling, please.
Just as I dislike programming questions in the Lounge, I dislike name-calling and abusive language.
Cheers,
Vikram. "When I read in books about a "base class", I figured this was the class that was at the bottom of the inheritence tree. It's the "base", right? Like the base of a pyramid." - Marc Clifton.
i dont mind to be
a stupid,better than being a moron - Adnan Siddiqi.
|
|
|
|
|
I like name-calling and really enjoy using abusive language and am not sensitive enough to care which way in the conversation it goes: in the end it means nothing... unless he REALLY is going to fly over here!
And much as I understand your perspective (you usually appear as a sensible chap) why would I care about what you like or dislike and why would it make me want/not want to do/not do it?
Oh, and arse-wipe wasn't meant to be abusive, it was how I see him.
turning the other cheek just gets you slapped twice
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where is the question?
|
|
|
|