|
No ideas, cause I haven't written for 9x systems in a VERY long time, and never a device driver.
You're talking about writing a device driver for a system that hasn't been supported by Microsoft in ages. Help on this is going to be extremely difficult to come by, if for no other reason, no one has anything to test the code on!
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
|
When i had Win98 a lot of driver shows blue screen, to remove without blue screen, you should go to safe mode.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah,I know it.
But my problem is how to modify my driver code to avoid the blue screen,and no need to go to safe mode.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
It's up to you to debug your driver code and find out why it's causing the BSOD. There's no one thing you can do to fix it. You have to find the bug and correct it, or implement the code to handle the situation that causes it.
But, it all starts with you and the kernel debugger...
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
Well,Thank you very much.
I think I should follow your words and have a try.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Can I write a shell extension which can process my own shell format?
For example: I have an application which has own data format, and when
drag from this applicaion and drop on explorer, the extension can process this data format.
It's like when you drag some texts and drop on explorer, which generate some special file.
Of course, I want generate my own files.
Anyone can help me?
|
|
|
|
|
The Shell doesn't do that, the application does that itself. When you drag some test from say, Word, Word is watching for an approprite drop target. When one is found and the drop happens, Word creates the file, not the Shell.
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, have some question with hping2...
QUESTION 1: how to you specify which interface to use without typing a very long string with GUID on Windows platform?
I tried this:
<br />
C:\tools\hping>hping2 www.someplace.com<br />
1. \Device\NPF_GenericDialupAdapter (Generic dialup adapter)<br />
2. \Device\NPF_{xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx} (SiS NIC SISNIC)<br />
3. \Device\NPF_{xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx} (VMware Virtual Ethernet A<br />
dapter)<br />
4. \Device\NPF_{xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx} (VMware Virtual Ethernet A<br />
dapter)<br />
5. \Device\NPF_{xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx} (Bluetooth PAN Driver)<br />
HPING www.someplace.com (eth1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx): NO FLAGS are set, 40 headers + 0 data byt<br />
es<br />
not presented<br />
<br />
RemoteIP=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx<br />
RemotePort=11111<br />
[send_ip] sendto: No error<br />
C:\tools\hping><br />
QUESTION 2: how come my hping resultset looks nothing like what's in "readme"?
The following is extracted from hping's doc "hping2-howto.txt":
<br />
# hping www.debian.org -p 80<br />
ppp0 default routing interface selected (according to /proc)<br />
HPING www.debian.org (ppp0 209.81.8.242): NO FLAGS are set, 40 headers + 0 data bytes<br />
[Ctrl+C]<br />
--- www.debian.org hping statistic ---<br />
5 packets trasmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss<br />
Thank you thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
You're going to have to direct these questions to the people that wrote hping. We can't support everyone elses software and libraries...
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
Here comes the infamous hping tool available for public download since the beginning of time http://www.hping.org/download.html
|
|
|
|
|
You should post this tool for other people to download and test it in order to find out the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
What free VNC works best with W2K?
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have to have a console session?
If not, and you mean Win2k server rather than workstation, just use terminal services in administrative mode. Much better performance than VNC.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm using RealVNC, It got a recomendation for it over on hardforum.com. It blew the performance of tightvnc out of the water. Monitoring a maximized boinc (distributed computing) client with taskamanger sitting on top. Tvnc was taking 8-15% (spiking to 20, averaging 10%) of my athlon1500 at 1024x768, rvnc is peaking at ~10% running 1280x1024, and averaging about 1%. This is over my home lan, so bandwidth wasn't an issue I looked at.
|
|
|
|
|
What do you mean? Give me more detail about your question?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your replies. I've decided to go with WinXP.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi! I have have a problem of accessing the IIS http site remotely when establishing network with DSL router acting as DHCP.
My configuration is as follows:
- I have a router connected to the internet and acts as DCHP
- I have my PC directly connected to the router through wired ethernet and obtain its IP address from the router
- On the PC I bridged my wired ethernet connection with a wifi connection so that my laptop can join the network and access the internet
- The laptop obtains its address also from the router through the PC bridge
now the laptop can see the PC from the network places and can share files and transfere files with no problems, but when I try to browse an IIS website on the PC from the laptop it cannot reach it.
The strange thing is that if I removed the bridge and established a wifi network using static IPs on both sides, the problem disappears and the site becomes accesable from the laptop, but once I bridge the connections back and the laptop join the network DHCPed by the router the site is not accessable again.
Please if anyone have an idea how to configure the network so that I can access the IIS remotley with the above network configuration please tell me.
Thanks in advance for your help
M@@K
|
|
|
|
|
MAAK wrote: On the PC I bridged my wired ethernet connection with a wifi connection
What do mean by this?? What did you use?? TOday's routers come with both wireless and wired connections, so why did you go through the PC to do this?
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
1. the WinXP has a nice feature called network bridge that can bridge two or more network adapters to brdige different networks together
2. i have no trouble in connection, i did say that the laptop joined the network
3. for your question, I didnt use the hard way except if there is no simpler way, so just assume that the route is a "yesterday router" with no wifi and single ethernet outlet, or simply it's too far to establish another wired or wireless connection
again the network is working well in terms of file sharing and pinging, the only problem is that i cannot access the IIS remotely unless i establish a dedicated static IPs wifi connection
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
MAAK wrote: On the PC I bridged my wired ethernet connection with a wifi connection so that my laptop can join the network and access the internet
- The laptop obtains its address also from the router through the PC bridge
Try to connect your laptop to the router, and test it whether is it working or not.
|
|
|
|
|
I would have tired this and saved me lots of trouble in connecting in the first place, but simply the router is too remote from me to make another wired connection or access it through wifi. Please note that I have no problem with connection and the laptop is joining the network and is seen as part of it, the remote IIS acess is the only problem
|
|
|
|
|
When you change the connection, you have no more problem. In my opinion, your obstacle is might be came from the type of connection its self. I never use wifi connectivity but in my opinion, i suggest you to check the property of your connection and try to analys which feature that might cause the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
well i already mentioned that connecting through wifi using static IPs on both sides without the bridge everything works well, it seems that there is a problem accessing just the http server when the router-network configuration
|
|
|
|
|
According to your first post[^] and MAAK wrote: connecting through wifi using static IPs on both sides without the bridge everything works well
.
From here, i suspect that your computer might not be able to obtain an IP address from the router. When the client could not obtain an IP address from the router, you will see it ip address form like 169.254.x.x, a self assign ip address to the client itself when it could not find DHCP server. On more question, do you have DHCP relay agent or your router have a built in DHCP relay agent?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
