|
Chris, since the update of yesterday, everything seems to have gone right, except one point.
when i update some pages on the site (most of the time), it warns me about a javascript error. i made a screenshot that i could send you if you want it (but maybe you already know the issue and fixing it)...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not seeing any errors in either IE or Firefox. If you could send me the screenshot that would be much appreciated.
More changes tomorrow. Mwhahahahaha!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It is in DIRE need of organization. Many contributions are un-editted, there needs to be a re-organization of article categories (I would bet at least 50% of the articles are about the data grid control), and the nuisance articles need to be eliminated.
Who's the maintainer for that section?
------- sig starts
"I've heard some drivers saying, 'We're going too fast here...'. If you're not here to race, go the hell home - don't come here and grumble about going too fast. Why don't you tie a kerosene rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
There's no maintainer. There's just us.
The current categorisation of articles is going to be scrapped and an entirely new system put in place. We liked the way MSDN2 did it so much that we've decided to follow suit.
Juuust kidding!
Seriously though: If you think the ASP.NET section is a teenager's closet then take a look at the C# section. The current system is too inflexible and doesn't allow narrowing down by framework version. We're working out little buns off to get this complete.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
My thrashing the forum trying to get in after the upgrade triggered a markread of everything posted overnight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While that sounds like a good idea it easily defeated by using a anti spam service such as mailinator.com[^].
You may be right
I may be crazy
-- Billy Joel --
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
Why?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes that would be handy it always seemed like it was to0 many steps to search the forums. It would be nice to have just one unified search for articles and/or forums
|
|
|
|
|
I think that in addition to tracking the number of times an article is viewed, it would be great to track the number of times that the demo/source-code files associated with an article are downloaded. It would be another helpful indicator for determining how popular/useful an article is, because most people only download those files if they really find the article interesting or helpful. Since most people don't vote on articles they read, even if they download the files and find them useful, this feature would provide a quick way to gauge how popular an article really is upon first viewing.
Am I alone in finding this idea to be a potentially good one?
Thanks,
Josh
|
|
|
|
|
Josh,
Actually CP does restrict downloads (non-HTML content) via a validated CP logon. Hence, having a counter for a particular article and its associated downloads to keep incrementing it, should be technically feasible though.
But there are certain other non-technical parameters that may need attention:
(*) Cp Downloads and Article Content/Description goes hand in hand. With download controls, would'nt there be a shift in focus like download-only servers?
(*) I also admit that this would be an added tool other than the votes (as you have indicated) to measure the success and reach of the article.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Web: http://www.lavanyadeepak.tk/
I Blog At:
http://www.dotnetjunkies.com/weblog/deepak/ http://deepakvasudevan.blogspot.com/ http://deepak.blogdrive.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely! I just came to this forum to suggest exactly this feature... I had a feeling someone would have requested it before. Hopefully if more people vote your suggestion up it will get put on the CP TODO shortlist
Getting to see the number of downloads of your code would give you a more accurate indication of roughly how many might be using it, whereas many people probably skim articles and move on if it's not what they're looking for. Plus search engine bots might be pushing up the page-hit value.
"... This man is obviously a psychotic."
"We-he-ell, uh, I'd like to hold off judgement on a thing like that, sir, until all the facts are in."
(Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb)
~ ScrollingGrid (cross-browser freeze-header control)
|
|
|
|
|
It's coming
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Membership status calculated as follows:
1-4 articles posted = Bronze. 5-14 articles = Silver. 15-24 articles = Gold. 25+ articles = Platinum. Each 500 messages posted adds one level, and if a user has posted a message then each year of membership adds 1 level. Bonus levels not valid for Gold members. Bronze is awarded at the beginning of the first 500 messages posted instead of the end.
well i do post up to 44
but i;m still Silver howcome !?
--------------------------
If you found my answer to your question useful; then vote for me.
------------------------
Ahmad Shaban
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You forgot that each year of membership adds a level (if they've posted at least one message) - again up to gold.
ColinMackay.net
Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
I think that be cool if you add the popularity rate in each article in the category listing (for example C| Articles[^]) because some times an article with 1 vote appears at top and somethings not is so good as the others.
The same thing happend in the last best picks area, is a good idea that an article qualify for the Best Pick after 5 or 8 votes.
Best Regards
Marcos
------------
My Articles[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe if they changed it up like google does.
If they listed most popular first an article creating your tic tac toe game would never show.
Maybe if they showed the top 5 and randomly showed the rest. To be fair for the writers
1 line of code equals many bugs. So don't write any!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic mode thread heads start out expanded, so they don't have links to expand them, and thus normally aren't ever recorded by the script as the "selected" post. But when the URL specifies one of 'em...
var Selected = "1427874";
|
|
|
|