|
Do you have the source code of this ActiveX ? If no, then it is impossible to do. An ActiveX is a specialized dll which is executable code. So, you cannot add code to such a module, you need to start from the source code, then add your specific code and recompile it.
|
|
|
|
|
No, you can do this if you actually add the control to your control. Then you'll have to have functions in your control that call all of the embedded control's functions, plus adding the two new methods you want.
My Music | My Pics | My Articles
BlackDice
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I do have. but I dont know how to add the new interface in existing activex control. Can u please guide me to it ?
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it
harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg."
- Bjarne Stroustrup
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I found that char could be converted to an interger as follows:
char c = 250;
int a = int(c)
How can I get the a value of a to be the same as what I put in? It sometimes comes out negative, although I can add 256. There is a simpler way?
thank you
|
|
|
|
|
thepersonof wrote: char c = 250;
thepersonof wrote: How can I get the a value of a to be the same as what I put in? It sometimes comes out negative, although I can add 256. There is a simpler way?
unsigned char c = 250;
Signed char limit is 127 .
Nibu thomas
Software Developer
|
|
|
|
|
thepersonof wrote: How can I get the a value of a to be the same as what I put in? It sometimes comes out negative, although I can add 256. There is a simpler way?
char c = 250;
int a = (int)(unsigned int)c;
|
|
|
|
|
thepersonof wrote: char c = 250;
int a = int(c)
char c = 250;
unsigned int a = (int)c;
??
|
|
|
|
|
Make c an unsigned char. (Yes, there are such a thing as signed and unsigned chars in C).
Or cast c to an unsigned char. So:
1.
unsigned char c = 250;
Or:
2.
int a = (int) (unsigned char) c;
Or both...
-- modified at 7:49 Thursday 6th April, 2006
OR:
int a = 250;
|
|
|
|
|
do you want the value of a to be 250 in this case?
We Believe in Excellence
www.aqueelmirza.cjb.net
|
|
|
|
|
Thankyou ... converted to an unsigned char and it works great
|
|
|
|
|
Yah i misunderstood. They are right.
We Believe in Excellence
www.aqueelmirza.cjb.net
|
|
|
|
|
union
{
char c[sizeof (int)];
int n;
} Convert;
char c = 250;
Convert.n = 0;
Convert.c[0] = c;
Then, in Convert.n you will get the proper value.
Good luck!
William
|
|
|
|
|
Geez
That's a really complicated way of doing that !
|
|
|
|
|
Chaa gia hai bhai!
We Believe in Excellence
www.aqueelmirza.cjb.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
hahahaha
What a solution yaar! Nice
Unique and innovative
We Believe in Excellence
www.aqueelmirza.cjb.net
|
|
|
|
|
...and you said what ?
|
|
|
|
|
i said "Chaa gia hai bhai" which means "Great job! brother!".
This is Urdu language idiom. It is used for a person who does something great.
We Believe in Excellence
www.aqueelmirza.cjb.net
|
|
|
|
|
thepersonof wrote: int a = int(c)
A cast is actually not necessary. You could accomplish the same with:
int a = c; because a char gets internally promoted to an int during such operations.
A char can hold values in the range -128 to 127, whereas an unsigned char can hold values in the range 0 to 255.
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there.
As the other replies have stated, you need to use the unsigned char for values above 127. To perform explicit conversions in C++, you should use the static_cast instead of the old C-Style casts.
<br />
unsigned char c = 250;<br />
int a = static_cast<int>(c);<br />
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
abbiyr wrote: To perform explicit conversions in C++, you should use the static_cast instead of the old C-Style casts.
For integral types, this is not necessary.
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Quite agree.
It is not necessary, the unsigned char will be cast correctly without it. I recommended it though, as it does explicity show the intentions of the developer.
|
|
|
|
|
When installing the VC6++ compiler on my PC (Win XP),
the installation process aborts with the message
"ODBC's SQLInstalldriver manager failed".
Can somebody please help ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
this did not help.
I even re-installed XP again,
the problem still exists.
|
|
|
|