|
Hey Rickard
Didn't you get my winsock sample to run yet?
Nish
If I am awake and my eyes are closed, it does not necessarily mean that I am thinking of naked women.
|
|
|
|
|
No 
But I've figure it out how it works with multithreaded server anyway now... 
------------------------------------
Rickard Andersson, Suza Computing
ICQ#: 50302279
I'm from the winter country SWEDEN!
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Basialy ur idea is corret..!! and you must care about stream/datagram and if u can handle the solution in such a way that the handshaking...that s better...if the client send a buffer and waiting for acknowledge and if the acknowledge get ,sene the next ,otherwiese resend the same...
|
|
|
|
|
Holy sh*t!
If you have the new PSDK you can use TransmitFile(...)
Nish 
If I am awake and my eyes are closed, it does not necessarily mean that I am thinking of naked women.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.
I am working on a program using the doc/view architecture. There is basically the program. There is a modeless dialog box where the user enters some information. When the user clicks "Apply" the dialog box sends a message to CMainFrame. From there, CMainFrame sends a message to CChildView. CChildView then draws the information as text inside its area.
I do not know how to send CChildView a message within CMainFrame. I am using the same technique Promises uses in Chapter 8 dialog 2 program (example of modeless). The only difference is he did not implement the program using doc/view. I am. In doc/view I do not know how to send a message from CMainFrame to CChildView because there is not CChildView object defined in CMainFrame:
CMyChildView cView;
cView.PostMessage(WM_MY_MESSAGE, 0, 0)
The code above does not work in doc/view.
I am using the same technique that Promises did. I am not sure if that is the prefer technique in the doc/view architecture. Please mention I should send the message directly from the dialog box to CChildView and how.
Thanks,
Kuphryn
|
|
|
|
|
|
 My win32 program is exiting with code 3 (0x3). It seems to run fine, and last week (before I made numerous changes to the application) it was exiting with code 0. My program returns the wParam from a WM_QUIT message. I have dug through the VC++ documentation and came up dry. The only thing that I found was that WinMain (or the wParam value from WM_QUIT) is supposed to exit with 0 on success. Can someone help me decipher what exit code 3 means?
|
|
|
|
|
I found some info in the MSDN Libray and it said to me that there is two functions (I found two): raise() and abort(). They can send a signal to the executing program. And the functions sends a SIGABRT signal to your program it will terminate with exit code 3. And it means then it was an "Abnormal termination".
Did you understand me!?
------------------------------------
Rickard Andersson, Suza Computing
ICQ#: 50302279
I'm from the winter country SWEDEN!
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
... or it could also be you who have caused the exit code by calling PostQuitMessage(3)... it causes a termination of your app with exit code 3! 
------------------------------------
Rickard Andersson, Suza Computing
ICQ#: 50302279
I'm from the winter country SWEDEN!
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
I think I finally figured it out... I am using VC++ .NET and I get the exit info from the output window. The EXE was exiting with code 3, not the win32 thread of my app (WinMain). I kinda gave up on the exit code 3 thing, and decided to check if my app had any memory leaks. It did. I tracked down the memory leak, ran the program and it exited with code 0. ... So, I think your first post was correct. The program was exiting "abnormally". Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
it may be due to the way you are exiting the program.
if you use
PostQuitMessage(WM_QUIT)
you should not have any problem
|
|
|
|
|
I am actually exiting with PostQuitMessage (0)... I tracked the problem down to be a memory leak, and the program was exiting with an "abnormal termination" exit code. The memory leak wasnt crashing the program or throwing an exception, which it should have... Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello:
I have a VC++ 6.0 executable program that only has one screen, such as control panel, it has many buttons and a displayable field. Depending on the buttons pressed, the program reads, validates, generates complex reports of ascii, or access files. Many guys use this program so I installed this in every PC that needs this program. For the other side, I am interested to know about WEB programming and apply the necessary changes to my program so it would not be necessary to distribute it in every PC.
However, because I am a novice, I have the next questions:
1. What things should I consider before modification of in my program so it can be WEB enabled?
2. In which moment should I use a complementary WEB programming languaje such as JAVA?
3. Is there a Web site which could help me more with my case?
Thank you for your help!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
why does the following function not work:
<br />
static bool bStatus = false;
<br />
void somefunction()<br />
{<br />
bStatus = true;<br />
}<br />
<br />
void main()<br />
{<br />
bStatus = false;<br />
somefunction();<br />
}<br />
<br />
At the "now bStatus should be true, right?" should bStatus be true, but it ISN'T!!! Anyone knows why not? What could it be? In normal C++ (MSVC++) the code above works normally.
But when using the C++ for the C165-board programming language (i use C165 in a mini-robot). As compiler the GNU-CC compiler is used.
|
|
|
|
|
Not knowing anything about C165, i prolly can't help you; the code looks correct to me. But,- How are you checking the value of bStatus? Your comment indicates that you are somehow, but doesn't specify.
- There's nothing "special" about bStatus, is there? I.E. you're not using it in an interrupt handler or something of that sort, right?
Just a side note: it is never correct to declare main() as returning void; always use int main();.
Sometimes i only remember, The days when i was young
Nowadays no one remembers when they were young and stupid... ADEMA, The Way You Like It
|
|
|
|
|
I check the status of bStatus using the == operator.
No interrupt handler or something modifies the bStatus variable.
Just as a side note: oops, i've written the code snippet only to show the problem. I looked it up. It is int 
|
|
|
|
|
Dominik Reichl wrote:
I check the status of bStatus using the == operator.
Hmm, you mean something like this:
if (bStatus == true)
puts("All is well!");
What if you just use:
if (bStatus)
puts("ALl is well!");
Any change?
Sometimes i only remember, The days when i was young
Nowadays no one remembers when they were young and stupid... ADEMA, The Way You Like It
|
|
|
|
|
No change.
Both versions do the same: the wrong thing.
Another problem. I tried the following:
<br />
...<br />
static bool bVal = false;
<br />
int main()<br />
{<br />
bVal = false;<br />
bVal = true;<br />
if(bVal == false) puts("Error");<br />
}<br />
and it shows "Error"!!! Something must really be wrong with the compiler...
|
|
|
|
|
That is very odd. If you initialize bVal to true, does it stay true?
...
static bool bVal = true;
int main()
{
bVal = true;
bVal = false;
if(bVal == true) puts("Error");
}
it does sound rather like a compiler bug.
Sometimes i only remember, The days when i was young
Nowadays no one remembers when they were young and stupid... ADEMA, The Way You Like It
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm. When i don't declare the variable globally (-> declare it locally in the main() function), it works...
|
|
|
|
|
i am not sure what is in the rest of your code but i would make the following changes.
static bool bStatus = false; // global variable
int somefunction(){////////////make the function int to return values
if (condition){///////////what ever your condition is to turn bStatus true
return true;
}else{
return false;
}
}
void main(){
bStatus = somefunction();//////////////it will now return true or false
}
|
|
|
|
|
I have a save-file from my program so structured:
char id[32];
int blocksize;
:
: <- various data for an amount of 'blocksize' bytes
:
char id[32];
int blocksize;
:
: <- various data for an amount of 'blocksize' bytes
:
char id[32];
int blocksize;
:
: <- various data for an amount of 'blocksize' bytes
:
With a generic number of "DATASET_#"
When I try to load the file, I use code similiar to this:
char id[32];
int blocksize;
FILE* f;
f = fopen(filename, "rb");
while (!feof(f))
{
fread(id,sizeof(char),32,f);
fread(&blocksize,sizeof(int),1,f);
if (strcmp(id,"DATASET_1") == 0)
{
fread( );
}
else if (strcmp(id,"DATASET_2") == 0)
{
fread( );
}
else
{
fseek(f,blocksize,SEEK_CUR);
}
}
fclose(f);
When I do this, the while loop never exits if, for example, the last dataset is unknown, it seems that the fseek() function has no effect on the next "while (!feof(f))" call.
I must take care of something about fseek under NT or WinXP or I must look for an error elsewhere ?
By now, I assume the data to be written well.
Thanks in advance for any suggestion.
|
|
|
|
|
from the MSDN for fseek:
"
You can use fseek to reposition the pointer anywhere in a file. The pointer can also be positioned beyond the end of the file. fseek clears the end-of-file indicator and negates the effect of any prior ungetc calls against stream.
"
fseek doesn't care about EOF.
-c
"What the hell are you getting so upset about? I thought you didn't believe in God".
"I don't," she sobbed, bursting violently into tears, "but the God I don't believe in is a good God, a just God, a merciful God. He's not the mean and stupid God you make Him out to be".
-- Joseph Heller
Smaller Animals Software, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, but does feof() take care of a previous fseek() ?
This loop never exits in a test program I've done... try it out plz if you can:
FILE* f;
long i;
f = fopen("c:\\a.txt","rb");
i = 0;
while (!feof(f))
{
fseek(f,i++,SEEK_SET);
}
fclose(f);
The file "a.txt" contains three simple characters.
|
|
|
|
|
Is your program C ( not C++) ?
Christian
The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little.
"I'm somewhat suspicious of STL though. My (test,experimental) program worked first time. Whats that all about??!?!
- Jon Hulatt, 22/3/2002
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
