|
Doesn't it go something like.
 Zafi whatshisface started codeguru and it was good.
You got really involved and did loads of stuff.
 They sold out to earth web or someone.
 Everyone thought "wow, didnt expect that, how much did he get?".
 There was codeguru and it wasnt good.
You started this place and it was good.
 The end?
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking something like a 5 page article (sighs) with pictures and all, but I do like your facial expressions for each different stage of the CP progression.
Nick Parker
|
|
|
|
|
LOL. In a nutshell
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
With me and my bad sense of clicking, it would be nice if you forced the preview popups to stay on top of the calling window (pseudo modal).
Say...
<body onBlur="focus();">
Just a thought.
Jeremy L. Falcon
"The One Who Said, 'The One Who Said...'"
<nobr>
Homepage : Feature Article : Sonork = 100.16311
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure whether this is a bug or by design,
When I view my own profile the member since is displayed as () rather giving the number of months and years. Viewing somebody else's profile shows the correct value (3 months)
Michael
|
|
|
|
|
Have you heard that the symbol () stands for 11-12 months....
Sorry
Nick Parker
|
|
|
|
|
It looks to be a problem with people who joined in April
Jason Hooper and kevnar are both missing the value and they joined in april as well.
James
Sonork: Hasaki
"I left there in the morning
with their God tucked underneath my arm
their half-assed smiles and the book of rules.
So I asked this God a question
and by way of firm reply,
He said - I'm not the kind you have to wind up on Sundays."
"Wind Up" from Aqualung, Jethro Tull 1971
|
|
|
|
|
More of a bugreport than suggestion.
Recently it seems that the latest entries in the lounge on the main page
is in some random order.
And a wish..
If you want to find a older thread today you have to keep pressing
next until you get to the page with the thread.
It would be nice with a list that only had the thread subjects.
/Magnus
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, either someone is VERY fast in implementing the suggestions,
or i should check better before posting something.
Anyway, forget the wish....since its already there..
/Magnus
|
|
|
|
|
What is the difference between the [View Thread] and [Get URL] links on each post. If you click them bith you get the same results. Both of them load the thread without any other threads.
Nish
If I am awake and my eyes are closed, it does not necessarily mean that I am thinking of naked women.
|
|
|
|
|
Nish [BusterBoy] wrote:
Subject:Re: Serious question [nothing to do with DirectX]
Step right up!
Now taking bets for how long it will be until Nish finds something else bring up in all his posts 
James
Sonork: Hasaki
"I left there in the morning
with their God tucked underneath my arm
their half-assed smiles and the book of rules.
So I asked this God a question
and by way of firm reply,
He said - I'm not the kind you have to wind up on Sundays."
"Wind Up" from Aqualung, Jethro Tull 1971
|
|
|
|
|
James T. Johnson wrote:
Now taking bets for how long it will be until Nish finds something else bring up in all his posts
Huh? I usually do that, do I?
I mean I usually have a habit of finding something funny or interesting and talking about it in all my posts?
Nish
If I am awake and my eyes are closed, it does not necessarily mean that I am thinking of naked women.
|
|
|
|
|
You haven't lately, but the past few posts here have been 
James
Sonork: Hasaki
"I left there in the morning
with their God tucked underneath my arm
their half-assed smiles and the book of rules.
So I asked this God a question
and by way of firm reply,
He said - I'm not the kind you have to wind up on Sundays."
"Wind Up" from Aqualung, Jethro Tull 1971
|
|
|
|
|
The 'Get URL' link appears in all messages so you can quickly grab the URL to send to friends or post elsewhere. The 'View Thread' restricts the list of messages to only those in the thread.
The difference in what they actually accomplish? Not a lot
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
The difference in what they actually accomplish? Not a lot
Typical coder attitude. He wrote two functions. And so he refuses to remove on of them even though both do the same thing.
Anyway thanks for the explanation Chris
Nish
If I am awake and my eyes are closed, it does not necessarily mean that I am thinking of naked women.
|
|
|
|
|
It's more a matter of cosmetics.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
When someone answer my question here on from a forum I receive a mail with that answer to my mail. But often the message is cut of or something... first I thought it was because they've answered a long message but today I received a message that had 5-6 lines + the sig.
Hmm... is it a bug or... a way to keep us coming back to CP! 
no seriously man, whats wrong!? Sometimes I don't have time to go to CP's long-time-loading forums and see the full answer there....
------------------------------------
Rickard Andersson, Suza Computing
ICQ#: 50302279
I'm from the winter country SWEDEN!
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Send me the URL of the message in the email and I'll take a look. Probably a stoopid quote problem I missed.
(although only giving you a teaser is a *great* idea :P)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
(although only giving you a teaser is a *great* idea)
------------------------------------
Rickard Andersson, Suza Computing
ICQ#: 50302279
I'm from the winter country SWEDEN!
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
giving you a teaser is a *great* idea
Could you "tease" us with pictures of naked women?
Isaac Sasson,
Lean, mean posting machine!
Sonork ID 100.13704
|
|
|
|
|
You're all class, Isaac 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
You're all class
Sorry Chris, been trying John's attitude 
Guess it doesn't work for me... 
Isaac Sasson,
Lean, mean posting machine!
Sonork ID 100.13704
|
|
|
|
|
The judges have turned in their scores, and here they are:
For Technical Merit:
5.4 5.4 5.4 5.1 5.3 5.5 5.3 5.3 5.4
For Presentation:
4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 5.0 5.1 4.8 4.9 4.9
I have to agree with the judges on the technical merit scores. The program had a fairly low lefvel of difficulty, but he did manage to spell all the words correctly, and he managed to keep his feet together during the often under-inspired "double-quote" move.
For Presentation, I think he should have gotten at least a 5.2 because he did put it out there for all the world to see, and that's a lot more than many of the other competitors will do tonight.
All in all, merely an average performance, but I'd look for great things from this CPian in the next Verbal Sparring Olympics in 2006.
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
Please review the Legal Disclaimer in my bio.
|
|
|
|
|
However, since the scoring in this event is entirely subjective it will probably be dropped. Actually, nearly all of the events will be scrapped except for those where he who cries first loses. That is, once we define crying in a non-subjective manner.
Sorry, I sometimes like to refer to long-dead threads.
|
|
|
|
|
It sometimes happens that way, specially when people use a lot of HTML tags in their posts.
View your email source and you'll see the entire post. The email client parses it wrong, that's all.
Nish
If I am awake and my eyes are closed, it does not necessarily mean that I am thinking of naked women.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
