|
toxcct wrote: maybe mathematicians finally use VB...
The best and fasted programming language ever? Who knows! 
------------------------------
PROST Roleplaying Game
War doesn't determine who's right. War determines who's left.
|
|
|
|
|
ihoecken wrote: The best and fasted programming language ever?
ok, i give you a chance : i'm not there, and i didn't hear what you've just said 
|
|
|
|
|
I just encountered a goto statement in some c++ microsoft code (olevar.cpp) today. Either goto is da sh*t, or someone got lazy. 
- S
50 cups of coffee and you know it's on!
|
|
|
|
|
might be a trainee who wrote this file... 
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Echols wrote: I just encountered a goto statement in some c++ microsoft code (olevar.cpp) today
Well, you can use the "goto" statement in C# too. Not long ago I saw code that used this statement. Giant routines and they jumped cross the code, back and somewhere else. It was hard to read and then the programmer made and error he couldn't finde, because of declaration of some variables...
I don't know why "goto" is available in so called "modern" languages like C#. 
Regards,
Ingo
------------------------------
PROST Roleplaying Game
War doesn't determine who's right. War determines who's left.
|
|
|
|
|
ihoecken wrote: I don't know why "goto" is available in so called "modern" languages like C#.
Wrong question.
I don't know why those people are allowed to program
Gotos don't kill source, bad programmers do.
|
|
|
|
|
peterchen wrote: Wrong question.
I don't know why those people are allowed to program
Gotos don't kill source, bad programmers do.
Ok, that's right. There can be good code using gotos. But I still don't know for what it should be good in C#??? 
Regards,
Ingo
------------------------------
PROST Roleplaying Game
War doesn't determine who's right. War determines who's left.
|
|
|
|
|
ihoecken wrote: Statisticians shot one time in front of the elephant, one time behind the elephant, so that the elephant is statistically dead.
This is a good one 
|
|
|
|
|
|
click.ok wrote: My favorite math website
you'll have to change it... now, all math stuff end here[^]  
|
|
|
|
|
toxcct wrote: you'll have to change it...
I was just thinking that.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I second toxcct on his post. No other resource is worth looking at now.
-- modified at 6:30 Thursday 27th July, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
click.ok wrote: What's your favorite math website.
This one.
"Money talks. When my money starts to talk, I get a bill to shut it up." - Frank
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
MathWorld[^]
"People who want to share their religious views with you almost never want you to share yours with them." - Anonymous
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn
|
|
|
|
|
I replied to you by mistake. I could swear I replied to the poster. Did you delete your message? 
There are II kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who understand Roman numerals. Web - Blog - RSS - Math
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: Did you delete your message?
No, it's still here.
"Money talks. When my money starts to talk, I get a bill to shut it up." - Frank
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
I meant the one from the email. It doesn't seem to be here cause I cilcked on the link and it's not here.
"I know which side I want to win regardless of how many wrongs they have to commit to achieve it." - Stan Shannon
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'll have to 3rd MathWorld, but I'm hoping with the brains on CP, this forum will give them a run for their money.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Blonde Geometry
Attached is problem 3 on a geometry examination. It is the solution submitted by a beautiful blonde student. It is our understanding that after careful scrutiny, the student was given credit for the answer by the teacher. When hearing of this the Board of Education warned math teachers to be more explicit in the wording of examination problems but was hesitant to suggest how.
Blonde cuts to the chase to find the X and eliminates all Geometry formulas.
Click here.[^]
There are II kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who understand Roman numerals. Web - Blog - RSS - Math
|
|
|
|
|
oh, that's a keeper.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
And math[^] and here[^].
My all-time favorite: The sum of the square roots of any two sides of an isosceles triangle is equal to the square root of the remaining side. That's a right triangle you idiot. D'oh!
There are II kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who understand Roman numerals. Web - Blog - RSS - Math
|
|
|
|
|
The second one with Lisa taking about Pi and Homer thinking about a slice of pie is funny.
That's no moon, it's a space station. - Obi-wan Kenobi
|
|
|
|
|
The Flood is over and the ark has landed. Noah lets all the animals out and says, "Go forth and multiply."
A few months later, Noah decides to take a stroll and see how the animals are doing. Everywhere he looks he finds baby animals. Everyone is doing fine except for one pair of little snakes. "What's the problem?" says Noah.
"Cut down some trees and let us live there", say the snakes.
Noah follows their advice. Several more weeks pass. Noah checks on the snakes again. Lots of little snakes, everybody is happy. Noah asks, "Want to tell me how the trees helped?"
"Certainly", say the snakes. "We're adders, so we need logs to multiply
----------------------
How many mathematicians does it take to change a light bulb?
- None. It's left to the reader as an exercise.
- None. The answer is intuitively obvious.
- One. He gives it to four programmers, thereby simplifying the problem to a previous question.
How many numerical analysts does it take to change a light bulb?
- 3.9967 (after six iterations).
How many mathematical logicians does it take to change a light bulb?
- None. They can't do it, but they can easily prove that it can be done.
How many classical geometers does it take to change a light bulb?
- None. You can't do it with a straight edge and a compass.
How many analysts does it take to change a light bulb?
- Three. One to prove existence, one to prove uniqueness and one to derive a nonconstructive algorithm to do it.
How many number theorists does it take to change a light bulb?
- I don't know the exact number, but I am sure it must be some rather elegant prime.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
