C / C++ / MFC

Re: iostream.h in Visual Studio 2005

1-Aug-06 5:52

iostream.h is the old implementation (from before the standard was formalized). It was left in the old versions of the IDE for backwards compatibility only. You should be using iostream (the same goes for vector, list, map, string, etc.)

If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week

Zac

Sarath C1-Aug-06 6:59

Sarath C

1-Aug-06 6:59

Check this.[^]

SaRath.

"Where I am from, there is no plan B. So, take advantage of today becuase tomorrow is not promised. - 50 Cent"

My Blog | Understanding State Pattern

Re: iostream.h in Visual Studio 2005

Michael Dunn1-Aug-06 19:37

Michael Dunn

1-Aug-06 19:37

The old iostream library was deprecated in VC 7, and removed in VC 8.

--Mike--
Visual C++ MVP Cool | :cool:

LINKS~! Ericahist | PimpFish | CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ

Debug runs, Release crashes. Why?

Hotte1-Aug-06 5:14

Hotte

1-Aug-06 5:14

Hi,

I've written an own FindDlg. It's derived from CDialog and just provides an own SelectionList. It crashes anywhere between CFindDlg::EndDialog(IDOK) and the calling Method. - Ain't nice but happens. Roll eyes | :rolleyes:

But the prog crashes only while executing release-build. Running debug-release don't crash. WTF | :WTF:

(Memory-Exeption during read...)

So how can I fix my prog, that it runs also within release-build. Or how can I find my bug? - I don't have any Idea?

Thanks && Greets,
Horst

Calling Method ==>

  CFindDlg dlgFind;<br />
  <br />
  dlgFind.SetTreeRef(m_pobjCurrentTree);<br />
  dlgFind.DoModal();<br />
  MessageBox("You won't see me....");<br />
<br />
  // Element anzeigen<br />
  if ( ! dlgFind.GetFoundItem().IsEmpty() ) { <br />
    LVFINDINFO SearchPattern;<br />
<br />
    SelectTreeItem(dlgFind.GetFoundItem());<br />
<br />
    SearchPattern.flags = LVFI_STRING;<br />
    SearchPattern.psz = dlgFind.GetFoundItem();<br />
<br />
    m_ctrlElement.SetItemState(m_ctrlElement.FindItem(&SearchPattern), LVIS_SELECTED, LVIS_SELECTED);<br />
    m_ctrlElement.SetFocus();<br />
  }<br />

<== Calling Method

OnOK ==>

void CFindDlg::OnOK() {<br />
  int iSelectedSOC;<br />
  POSITION pListSelection = m_ctrlFoundItem.GetFirstSelectedItemPosition();<br />
<br />
  iSelectedSOC = pListSelection == NULL ? -1 : m_ctrlFoundItem.GetNextSelectedItem(pListSelection);<br />
  m_sFoundItem = iSelectedSOC == -1 ? "" : m_ctrlFoundItem.GetItemText(iSelectedSOC, 0);<br />
<br />
  MessageBox("This will be the last you will see before abort...");<br />
  EndDialog(IDOK);<br />
}<br />

<== OnOK

Re: Debug runs, Release crashes. Why?

toxcct1-Aug-06 5:20

Re: Debug runs, Release crashes. Why?

1-Aug-06 5:20

everything is here[^]...

TOXCCT >>> GEII power

[VisualCalc 3.0 updated ][Flags Beginner's Guide new! ]

David Crow1-Aug-06 5:45

David Crow

1-Aug-06 5:45

Hotte wrote:
dlgFind.DoModal();
MessageBox("You won't see me....");

This looks suspicious. Are you doing anything with m_pMainWnd?

Hotte wrote:
Running debug...

F5 or Ctrl+F5?

"Money talks. When my money starts to talk, I get a bill to shut it up." - Frank

"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb

Re: Debug runs, Release crashes. Why?

Zac Howland1-Aug-06 5:56

Sir, Why Virtual Constructor doesn't exist ? Whereas we have virtual Destructor.

1-Aug-06 5:56

Hotte wrote:
MessageBox("This will be the last you will see before abort...");
EndDialog(IDOK);
}

Have you tried calling CDialog::OnOK() instead of EndDialog?

Check to make sure you don't have a stack limitation set in your release build settings.

You say you are getting a memory exception during your read operation in the debug build, correct?

If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week

Zac

CodeVarma1-Aug-06 4:40

CodeVarma

1-Aug-06 4:40

Sir, Why Virtual Constructor doesn't exist ? Whereas we have virtual Destructor.What may be the reason for that?
pls give explaination for this as i am a bit confused.
bye Thank u. Smile | :)

Fly Like An Eagle With MIGHTY POWER.

Re: Sir, Why Virtual Constructor doesn't exist ? Whereas we have virtual Destructor.

toxcct1-Aug-06 4:45

Re: Sir, Why Virtual Constructor doesn't exist ? Whereas we have virtual Destructor.

1-Aug-06 4:45

if you know what virtual is made for, you would understand that the behavior of a type constructor shouldn't (actually, cannot) be changed/overriden by a child...

on the other side, destructors should always be virtual, so that when destructing a variable, it starts by the child destruction, and then, the base class destruction...

TOXCCT >>> GEII power

[VisualCalc 3.0 updated ][Flags Beginner's Guide new! ]

Zac Howland1-Aug-06 4:55

Re: Sir, Why Virtual Constructor doesn't exist ? Whereas we have virtual Destructor.

1-Aug-06 4:55

toxcct wrote:
on the other side, destructors should always be virtual

Not always, just any time you are writing a class that is meant (or allows for) a class to be derived from it. The STL containers do not have virtual destructors because they are not meant to be base classes.

Basically, any time you have a virtual function in your class, you should declare your destructor as virtual.

As for the OP ... the way constructors work does not provide a need for virutal constructors. When an object is created, its allocation is started from the most base class and then works down towards the desired derived class. In other words, if you have a heirarchy where A is derived from B is derived from C, and you declare a variable of type A, the constructor for C is called, then B, and finally A.

If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week

Zac

toxcct1-Aug-06 4:59

Re: Sir, Why Virtual Constructor doesn't exist ? Whereas we have virtual Destructor.

1-Aug-06 4:59

Zac Howland wrote:
Not always, just any time you are writing a class that is meant (or allows for) a class to be derived from it. The STL containers do not have virtual destructors because they are not meant to be base classes.

Basically, any time you have a virtual function in your class, you should declare your destructor as virtual.

actually, this is what i meant. you're not obliged to put every dtors virtual, but as there's no pb to declare them virtual if their class is not derived, and as they should be virtual when the class is derived, then, ,it's more easy to always declare a destructor virtual... Wink | ;)

TOXCCT >>> GEII power

[VisualCalc 3.0 updated ][Flags Beginner's Guide new! ]

Zac Howland1-Aug-06 5:11

Re: Sir, Why Virtual Constructor doesn't exist ? Whereas we have virtual Destructor.

1-Aug-06 5:11

toxcct wrote:
actually, this is what i meant. you're not obliged to put every dtors virtual, but as there's no pb to declare them virtual if their class is not derived

The only problem is that if there are no derived classes (or your class is not meant to allow for derived classes), it is a HUGE overhead to declare it virtual (which causes a v-table to be created for that object).

If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week

Zac

Warren Stevens1-Aug-06 5:13

Warren Stevens

1-Aug-06 5:13

Zac Howland wrote:
Basically, any time you have a virtual function in your class, you should declare your destructor as virtual.

I've always thought of this as a defect in C++, and yet another reason for people to say (rightly in this case) that C++ is too complex.

For legacy-code reasons it's probably too late now, but it really should have been an error if you 1) add a virtual function 2) write a destructor and not make it virtual.

Sigh | :sigh:

Huge list of Stock Icon collections (free and commercial): www.IconsReview.com

Re: Sir, Why Virtual Constructor doesn't exist ? Whereas we have virtual Destructor.

toxcct1-Aug-06 5:19

Re: Sir, Why Virtual Constructor doesn't exist ? Whereas we have virtual Destructor.

1-Aug-06 5:19

matter of performances...

BTW, you'd better know what you do when you code, complex is the language or not Wink | ;)

TOXCCT >>> GEII power

[VisualCalc 3.0 updated ][Flags Beginner's Guide new! ]

Zac Howland1-Aug-06 5:23

Re: Sir, Why Virtual Constructor doesn't exist ? Whereas we have virtual Destructor.

1-Aug-06 5:23

Warren D Stevens wrote:
I've always thought of this as a defect in C++, and yet another reason for people to say (rightly in this case) that C++ is too complex.

For legacy-code reasons it's probably too late now, but it really should have been an error if you 1) add a virtual function 2) write a destructor and not make it virtual.

I've never really had a problem with this (and I have always failed to see why others have a problem with it). If you declare a function virtual in your class, make your destructor virtual as well. If you have no virtual functions, no need to declare your destructor virtual. I can't remember if Microsoft's compiler does this, but I do know that Intel's and GNU both give you a warning (when you have your warning level set to the highest setting) if you have a class with a virtual member function and no virtual destructor.

It should not be an error because it is valid (as far as the standard is concerned), but it is bad practice since it causes lots of bugs. If you made this into an error, you would have to do the same for things like using new without a corresponding delete.

If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week

Zac

David Crow1-Aug-06 4:56

David Crow

1-Aug-06 4:56

CodeVarma wrote:
Why Virtual Constructor doesn't exist ?

Virtual implies partial information. In other words, only the interface is known as opposed to the exact object type. You need complete information about an object in order to create it.

"Money talks. When my money starts to talk, I get a bill to shut it up." - Frank

"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb

Tab Control using 'CTabCtrl'?

Andy Rama1-Aug-06 4:39

1-Aug-06 4:39

Hi to all,
How I can use "Tab Control" in a Dialog?
I had searched for it, but the method was to create a new Class inherited from 'CTabCtrl'.
Can't I use simple Member Variable for "Tab Control" of 'CTabCtrl' type in that Dialog?

Thanks & Best Regards,
Aniket Salunkhe

Hamid_RT1-Aug-06 4:53

1-Aug-06 4:53

Hope I understood your question
you can insert a tab from ToolBax in your form and declare a variable for it and now you can use from it and see http://www.codeproject.com/tabctrl/(General)[^]

WhiteSky

Andy Rama1-Aug-06 20:32

1-Aug-06 20:32

WhiteSky wrote:
Hope I understood your question

Take an example that in Dialog I have a ComboBox 'IDC_COMBO1'. Let member variable attached to it is 'm_cmbCombo1' of 'CComboBox' Class. So to add data in it we can directly use AddString(), InsertString(),..etc.

Similary can't I use a Member variable 'm_tabTab1' of 'CTabCtrl' Class( for a Tab Control) to AddPages & other operation using help of other classes like 'CPropertyPage', 'CPropertySheet',..

'CTabCtrl' has a methods, InsertItem() & other. So using that methods only, can't I use Tab Control ( OR add Dialogs to Tab Control)....instead of Inheriting a new Class from 'CTabCtrl'.

Hamid_RT2-Aug-06 9:29

2-Aug-06 9:29

I dont understand Is your problem CTabCtrl that you cant insert items to it?

WhiteSky

Andy Rama2-Aug-06 21:04

2-Aug-06 21:04

ya, ( how to insert Dialog using Member Fubctions of CTabCtrl Class? )

Hamid_RT2-Aug-06 22:01

2-Aug-06 22:01

See

<br />
//you dont need to create if you enter from toolbox<br />
m_Tab1.Create(WS_CHILD|WS_VISIBLE,CRect(0,0,150,45),this,1);<br />
<br />
	TC_ITEM TabCtrlItem;<br />
TabCtrlItem.mask = TCIF_TEXT|TCIF_PARAM|TCIF_STATE;<br />
	TabCtrlItem.dwState=TCIS_HIGHLIGHTED ;<br />
<br />
	CStringArray m_GetString;<br />
	m_GetString.Add("Item1");<br />
	m_GetString.Add("Item2");<br />
	m_GetString.Add("Item3");<br />
	for(int i=0;i<m_GetString.GetCount();i++)<br />
	{<br />
	TabCtrlItem.pszText = CT2A(m_GetString.GetAt(i));<br />
		TabCtrlItem.lParam=i;<br />
	m_Tab1.InsertItem( i, &TabCtrlItem );<br />
	}<br />
<br />

WhiteSky

Andy Rama2-Aug-06 23:11

2-Aug-06 23:11

WhiteSky wrote:
for(int i=0;i {
TabCtrlItem.pszText = CT2A(m_GetString.GetAt(i));

error in these line. 'CT2A' : undeclared identifier

WhiteSky wrote:
m_Tab1.InsertItem( i, &TabCtrlItem );

InsertItem() will add tabs in Tab Control.... instead of that can I add dialogs ( other newly created dialogs) in Tab Control as a new tab?

Hamid_RT3-Aug-06 0:52