|
Maybe. This was a few years back, but the impression I got was that the sloshing didn't just effect the hieghts of the tides, but offset the locations of the bulges as well. IIRC there was mention of a large bay(sea?) that ended up with a 24hr cycle instead of the normal 12.
|
|
|
|
|
dan neely wrote: Maybe. This was a few years back, but the impression I got was that the sloshing didn't just effect the hieghts of the tides, but offset the locations of the bulges as well. IIRC there was mention of a large bay(sea?) that ended up with a 24hr cycle instead of the normal 12.
about my biggest worry will be proximity to islands... This will be deep pacific, it will never (as far as I know) be in an inland sea like the gulf of Mexico.
_________________________
Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau.
Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffry J. Brickley wrote: calculate current ocean level minus wave motion
If you are referring ot wind driven waves, then, unless the boat is in a fairly fierce storm, and quite a small vessel, this fluctuation can be ignored.
Jeffry J. Brickley wrote: I need to add in the tidal effect in ocean height based on the lunar cycle
This will be almost impossible. Tides are extraordinarially complex. Some parts of the earth have virtually no tide (I mean in addition to the Med, which has no tide, some open ocean islands also have no tides). Other parts, like the channel islands, and th eBristol channel have as much as a 10 meter variation. Some places, like Southampton have two high tides.
This is all because water swirls and flows around the earth, dragged by the moon, and the way it moves is affected by land, and interfeerence wave paterns.
Additionally, when the sun and moon are in line larger tidal forces are generated.
I would say that calculating the height of a tide from the moons position would be almost impossible.
Instead I would refer to know tide heights around the world in relation to highwater Grenwich.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
|
|
|
|
|
fat_boy wrote: This will be almost impossible.
Very true... but at least in the process of learning it, I ruled out the need for it. This should be deep pacific only, even when they are around islands they should get only minor tidal forces. I am knew to tides (I live in a freakin' desert!), so I had to ask. Now I know, but that means one less calculation.
_________________________
Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau.
Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
|
|
|
|
|
i am findisng myself unable to solve the following problem:
An equation of the tangent line to the curve
y=f(x)=x(8 cosx- 2 sinx)
at the point (4pi, f(4pi) is y =???
use pi=3.14(yes, approximate it to that), and ofcourse, cos(4pi) = 1, sin(4pi)=0.
any takers? i cant see why im getting it wrong. yes, this is for homework.
-- modified at 8:52 Wednesday 11th October, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Umm...just pointing out that there is a Math[^] forum and you'd probably be better of getting an answer there.
"A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine." - Thomas Jefferson
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin
Edbert
Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
yeah, but no one posts there. so i would probably get more answers/ideas/nonsense here.
|
|
|
|
|
Anton Afanasyev wrote: yeah, but no one posts there. so i would probably get more answers/ideas/nonsense here.
Here you will get only 2-3 anwsers. How to know who is correct if they are not compatible?
Try sent emails to, say, 100.000 people. The most popular answer has to be the correct one.
|
|
|
|
|
He still has a better chance for an answer here, but the Math forum would give him less abuse and better karma.
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
Linkify! || Fold With Us! || sighist
|
|
|
|
|
peterchen wrote: He still has a better chance for an answer here
Might as well open up the Lounge to programming questions then.
Cheers,
Vikram.
"whoever I am, I'm not other people" - Corinna John.
|
|
|
|
|
peterchen wrote: but the Math forum would give him less abuse and better karma.
whoa whoa whoa. you mean the votes actually do something? like, make me Rise and Fall amongst the ranks of all the CPians?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, at the end of the universe, The Great Maunder will count your fives and ones and theywill determine whether you come back as hamster. Or badger.
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
Linkify! || Fold With Us! || sighist
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, but which one is better? Surely the most dedicated of CP members would like to give back something to CP (in the form of pedal power).
|
|
|
|
|
As you know, hamster run the servers (more responsibility, but then, Dave comes whipping you about daily), whereas badgers only run the signatures of.. some... members........
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
Linkify! || Fold With Us! || sighist
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are you using the product rule when you take the derivative?
And I get on my knees and pray.
We don't get fooled again.
|
|
|
|
|
well the derivative itself is correct. i got a friend and a online thing to check that for me
and, i dont know what the right answer is. its an online submission thing, and it only says right/wrong not which part.
|
|
|
|
|
nevermind. aparently, i dont know how to add
|
|
|
|
|
y = (8 - 8pi)x + 32 pi<sup>2</sup> ??
|
|
|
|
|
yeah, correct. as i said above, i seem to not know how to add
|
|
|
|
|
I agree... as long as you mean the last term is 32(pi)^2
Ryan "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"
|
|
|
|
|
As already pointed out, there's a maths forum but here goes
y = f(x)
slope M = dy/dx
You have one point on the line - (4PI, f(4PI)), and since it is the tangent to the curve, its slope will be -1/M it has the same slope. Just use the slope-point equation for the straight line (IIRC, it's y - y1 = m(x - x1) ).
To find m at the point, simply substitute for x and y in dy/dx.
Please post in the maths forum in future. HTH.
Nostalgia is a very powerful emotion.
-- corrected slope of tangent, which I misread as normal. Thanks to Ryan. modified at 4:57 Wednesday 11th October, 2006
Cheers,
Vikram.
"whoever I am, I'm not other people" - Corinna John.
|
|
|
|
|
Vikram A Punathambekar wrote: Nostalgia is a very powerful emotion
thanks, already got it. as i said above(2 times now lol), i seem to have lost all ability to do simple addition
|
|
|
|
|
Vikram A Punathambekar wrote: since it is the tangent to the curve, its slope will be -1/M.
Not quite. If you know the gradient of a point on the curve, the gradient of the tanget line is equal to the gradient of the curve at the point of the tangent. The gradient of the normal to the line at the given point is -1/m.
The equation of tangent the line is y = f'(x<sub>0</sub>)(x - x<sub>0</sub>) + f(x<sub>0</sub>) where x<sub>0</sub> is the point he wants the tangent at and f'(x) is the first derivative of the curve.
Ryan "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, mate, I corrected my post.
I misread tangent as normal.
Cheers,
Vikram.
"whoever I am, I'm not other people" - Corinna John.
|
|
|
|