|
Try Source Gear Vault[^]. Been using it almost a year now. Interface looks like source safe, but works better. Repository is SQL Server DB, although I'm pretty sure you can use other RDBMS. Works great over internet as well. Several of us work from home and Source Safe was a huge pain. No problems now.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark J. Miller wrote: Try Source Gear Vault[^]. Been ... Works great over internet as well. Several of us work from home and Source Safe was a huge pain. No problems now.
Absolutely agree. It is a fantastic product for distributed teams.
|
|
|
|
|
As you want to do this 'in the browser', the ASP.NET forum is really the place to ask, or perhaps the Web Dev forum ? The .NET Framework forum doesn't get a lot of traffic.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
My advice would be in this case:
1. Don't go to far with the graphics in the user interface. The fancier the looks the more data the user will need to download from the server. There's another reason for not doing too much graphics, it consumes more memory and CPU to render.
2. Don't load too much into memory, but don't load too little into memory either. This is a hard one, as you have to balance between more CPU power and less memory or more memory and less CPU power. Typically you need more memory if you load a lot of data and don't use paging. On the other hand paging increases CPU usage as you have to get data from the datastore every time your user switches pages.
To measure the performance, you need something like ants profiler. Also I recommend you actively use FxCop to get best results out of the .NET framework.
Hope this helps
WM.
What about weapons of mass-construction?
"You can always try to smash it with a wrench to fix that. It might actually work" - WillemM
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
what is shawdoing? what is the difference b/w over loading & shadowing?
i read this in mSDN but i am still confused with this concept.
please can anyone explain me what is this Shadowing?
Thanks in advance
Rahi
If you look at what you do not have in life, you don't have anything,
If you look at what you have in life, you have everything... "
|
|
|
|
|
By overloading a method you get an alternative for that method. By shadowing a method you simply hide the other version of the method and it becomes inaccessable.
WM.
What about weapons of mass-construction?
"You can always try to smash it with a wrench to fix that. It might actually work" - WillemM
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks now i got to know what Shadowing is. When ever i post some question in this forum by expecting this type of answers but i am not receiving exact response from the forum members. They are asking to read from the sites and books etc., they are correct. Atleast they are showing me the way but after reading from the book only i am posting my questions here. Some times i got struck (hang-up) with some topics may be they are very simple. as i am new to this technology..i need simple explaination like what u dropped here for shadowing....
Thanks once again for ur response.
Rahi
If you look at what you do not have in life, you don't have anything,
If you look at what you have in life, you have everything... "
|
|
|
|
|
Overloading can occur with in the same class too, for eg:
<br />
public int addnumbers(int a, int b)<br />
{<br />
return a+b;<br />
}<br />
public int addnumbers(int a, int b, int c)<br />
{<br />
return a+b+c;<br />
}<br />
Method Hiding can happen only when inheritance comes to picture
<br />
public class Maths<br />
{<br />
public Maths()<br />
{<br />
}<br />
public int addnumbers(int a, int b)<br />
{<br />
return a+b;<br />
}<br />
}<br />
public class TwoMaths : Maths<br />
{<br />
public TwoMaths()<br />
{<br />
}<br />
<br />
public int addnumbers(int a, int b)<br />
{<br />
return a+b;<br />
}<br />
<br />
}<br />
|
|
|
|
|
thanks for ur response. really ur example is very simple and clear. this will be a very good example for those candidates(like me) who are new to this .net technology i came to know what shadowing is with ur's and willem's explanation.
now i can read some more about shadowing from books & Sites.
Thanks once again,
Rahi
If you look at what you do not have in life, you don't have anything,
If you look at what you have in life, you have everything... "
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Can an application deployed with Click Once allow the user to browse and select a file from the file system? From my research I think this is possible but have not found exactly what needs to be done.
If you have worked with Click Once in the past I'd really like to hear about your experience. It sounds like an interesting way to give internal (Intranet) users a better UI experience. I'm especially interested in the security limitations or what must be done to work within them.
Thanks for the help.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because there's not anything that you need a DataBinding for in these controls, if you want to store the data from these, then you would use a database. The reason that you have to do it that way is because there may be times when there's more data than what can stored via a DataBinding.
Trinity: Neo... nobody has ever done this before.
Neo: That's why it's going to work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
code_wiz wrote: Hmm, then going by what you said, is there any reason why MS supports DataBinding in controls such as ComboBox control????
Because a ComboBox is used to select an item. ListViews and TreeViews more often used to organize/view options.
Trinity: Neo... nobody has ever done this before.
Neo: That's why it's going to work.
|
|
|
|
|
There was no easy way at the time to handle the millions of different possibilities of hierarchical data. I'm guessing it was easier at the time to let the programmer take care of things and hope for something better.
Thankfully this has been solved with the introduction of WPF.
I have no idea what I just said. But my intentions were sincere.
|
|
|
|
|
hamid
|
|
|
|
|
Using c# how will we get ascii value for refresh buttun????
Please help me.
Rgds
Nithin
|
|
|
|
|
Nithin Krishna wrote: Using c# how will we get ascii value for refresh buttun????
What refresh button? The most common is "F5" which doesn't have an ASCII value.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi friends,
am developing a webservice and one problem am facing is that when an error occured due to coding or network getting an error page, at that time pressing the refresh button again the same rquest is sending to the server.
I don't want this. So suggest some ways to solve this, means
how we can redirect the page to another while refereshing the page or disabling the refresh button...
Please help me........
Rgds
Nithin
|
|
|
|
|
You can use AJAX to accomplish this. This would control the HttpRequests.
|
|
|
|
|
This is not a web service, a web service has no UI
You can't do it. If you refresh, it will send a request to the server. If the server then redirects to another page, that's another question.
Or, did I misunderstand you ?
Christian Graus - C++ MVP
'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any API in the .NET framework that will give me the number of processors and/or processor cores there are?
I'm looking to enable my program to use multiple processors in some methods. It will create as many threads as there are cores and use each one equally in certain methods.
-- modified at 22:33 Friday 5th January, 2007
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
█▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█
█▒██████▒█▒██
█▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
|
|
|
|
|
Though I may be wrong but I don't believe you have any control, nor would you want to, as to which processor/core to use. I remember reading a paper about this with the jist being that routing tasks to the processors/cores is a very complex algorithm that wiser people then I spend many years perfecting (or at least trying to).
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Nischalke wrote: Though I may be wrong but I don't believe you have any control, nor would you want to, as to which processor/core to use.
Well each core will be utilized at 100% so I thought that if I had two threads and each thread is using all available CPU time that the OS would move one of the threads to another core or processor.
For example I have a loop that iterates through a very large array and acts on each array item independently. If there are more cores available I could divide the loop so the first thread will work on the first half and the second thread will work on the second half, depending on how many cores there are it will be divided into 4 or 8.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
█▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█
█▒██████▒█▒██
█▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
|
|
|
|
|
I can't find what I'm looking for, but:
Look in System.Diagnostics for detecting multiple CPU's
Look at System.Threading.Thread for setting thread Affinity
Ignore what I said about _AppDomain, it's not there.
However, what I've read suggests using the existing .NET threadpool, and let .NET do what it can about balancing your load.
|
|
|
|