|
Can you give me a code example?
|
|
|
|
|
Programm3r wrote: while (x < get) {
x++;
}
that can end in an infinite loop.
|
|
|
|
|
I was aiming for a very simple concept .....
The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... 
Programm3r
|
|
|
|
|
i repeat : don't do successive ifs like this. use else if instead
|
|
|
|
|
Your logic is still wrong, however.
The get variable can only be greater than, less than, or equal to 10, so there is no need to check for all three conditions.
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
what means x++ ?
And is int x = 0 better then int x;
x = 0;
?
with code while (x < get) loop continues 10 times
|
|
|
|
|
reyyy wrote: And is int x = 0 better then int x; x = 0;
yes, initializing directly in the same instruction than the declaration will give better performances.
reyyy wrote: what means x++ ?
seriously, i think you really need to open you ears at school, or document yourself a bit more, because this is part of the very basics of the C/C++ languages.
if you don't know this, don't try to go further.
|
|
|
|
|
toxcct wrote: yes, initializing directly in the same instruction than the declaration will give better performances.
In the context of his program, it won't make one bit of difference.
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
reyyy wrote: what means x++ ?
Increment x using the post-increment operator.
reyyy wrote: And is int x = 0 better then int x;
x = 0;
?
For what you are doing, they are effectively identical.
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
I was using revvy's code ... for a simple example ... thats all
The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's.....
Programm3r
|
|
|
|
|
And is int x = 0 better then int x;
x = 0;
?
with code while (x < get) loop continues 10 times
|
|
|
|
|
Programm3r wrote:
I was using revvy's code ... for a simple example ... thats all
Ok, and?? 
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Can you answer to my question?
|
|
|
|
|
reyyy wrote: Can you answer to my question?
Your question has been answered multiple times.
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
reyyy wrote: Can you answer to my question?
check your mails and read the thread. you already got all the answers to your questions 
|
|
|
|
|
didn't see, thx and srry
Is there possible, that for if (get > 11) it can generate 2 or more different cout's, and if yes, i write them same like:
std::cout << "blah blah";
std::cout << "bleh bleh";
and how do i know whych time it will take witch output?
thx
|
|
|
|
|
please write your wanted algorithm in plain english. we will see then if your thoughts are clear first.
ps: be careful, the soapbox is close for you 
|
|
|
|
|
is there possible this code:
if (get > 50) {
std::cout << "bleh";
std::cout << "blah"
and whitch of couts the program will take each time?
|
|
|
|
|
i said in english, not in C++ 
tell IN ENGLISH the algorithm you want to have
|
|
|
|
|
I don't really understand what you mean, but i want to know is there possible to assign more then 1 cout to if function? And if it's possible can you show me how and how do i know witch cout program will take first, and it's there possible to say to program witch cout it needs to take first.
thx
|
|
|
|
|
ok, enough. go buy a book. i give up.
if you don't even know that a procedural language execute from the beginning to the end in the order it was written (at the exception of loops and jumps), i can't do anything for you. 
|
|
|
|
|
That's the thing i have read alraedy book, but i don't understand how to really use it.
|
|
|
|
|
Why do you strain yourselves? Try something else. Not programming.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
ப்ரம்மா
|
|
|
|
|
I understand princips of programming, but i don't understand usage of syntax well, i have read a book, but still it's not enaught to uderstand and get into programming for 100% i need to learn much and most of veterans are stil learning, so suite your self.
|
|
|
|
|
toxcct wrote: check your mails and read the thread. you already got all the answers to your questions
Send him to the SoapBox and I will take care of him 
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
ப்ரம்மா
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
