|
I just submitted an article and it didn't upload my screen shot. Is the article submission wizard broken?
Also, I went to modify the article (when I noticed my file upload didn't appear to upload) and the data entry page appeared to want to cut off my title and description, so I canceled out of the modify.
-- modified at 10:58 Sunday 19th August, 2007
And yes, the image is no wider than 640 pixels.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
The upload was there but the reference to the image in the article was incorrect. I've fixed it, wrapped your code, set your PRE block language correctly, tagged your variables, checked the typre pressure and filled the washer fuid reservoir.
Should be good to go
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I've fixed it, wrapped your code, set your PRE block language correctly, tagged your variables, checked the typre pressure and filled the washer fuid reservoir.
Canadian Tire would also have got him to replace his perfectly good battery! 
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm...
Was there seriously that much wrong with it?
I created the article body in a text editor, and it displayed just fine (except for the image part evidently).
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
No, there wasn't much but there were a few things such as the code in the PRE tag being too wide (causing scrolling) and the PRE tags not having Lang attribute (so the colorizer couldn't do it's thing - not that the colorizer is 100% at the moment). Also ensure you enter width/height tags for images - it stops the page resizing with a jerk when the image is actually loaded
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
PRE tags - I'm working on a 22-inch wide screen monitor, so it's kinda hard to determine what an acceptable width is regarding the code in a PRE tag. I also didn't know about (or forgot about) the language attribute.
Images - perhaps the article submission wizard could automagically determine the width/height of the uploaded image, and include it in the img tag. It may already do this but I deleted the default content of the article and substituted it with my own. Maybe on the content editing screen, there could be a dropdown/button that injected the appropriate markup at the cursor position in the edit field (kind of like the quoting functionality we have now).
In any event, I'll try to do better. 
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: PRE tags - I'm working on a 22-inch wide screen monitor, so it's kinda hard to determine what an acceptable width is regarding the code in a PRE tag.
The editor window itself is sized so that if it doesn't scroll there, it won't scroll when viewing an article live.
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Images - perhaps the article submission wizard could automagically determine the width/height of the uploaded image, and include it in the img tag.
It does this if you use the image button on the toolbar, and there's also a link next to uploaded images (just above the editor) that you can click to insert an image with all the right fixin's
I'm always after ways to make this easier...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I guess the next logical step is to make it read my mind.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Not even a program should be asked to read your mind. Some things are too cruel.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I think it was be really cool to have a forum for this. It would be nice to have a place to get and/or give help on xaml questions.
Don't be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good
|
|
|
|
|
no response?
Don't be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good
|
|
|
|
|
You shouldn't expect immediate responses to your messages. Give it some more time.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
teejayem wrote: It would be nice to have a place to get and/or give help on xaml questions
Already been sugguested, sounds like it will happen
XAML/WPF/WCF .NET 3.0 discussion forum?[^]
With respect, I must disagree. A quick look at middle management in just about any corporation shows that the dodo not only survived, it's reproducing in record numbers. Christopher Duncan
|
|
|
|
|
sweet, thats great to hear. hope to see it soon
Don't be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good
|
|
|
|
|
Each of the article has its own messageboard in CodeProject. Isn't it? This can be roughly compared to a blog post alongwith its tailing comments section.
I just thought it would be good if 'Total Number of Comments: <number>' can also be displayed. To extend it further, we can have it as a hyperlink to Comment Break up page (optionally viewable only by Article Author/Administrator' to display the following breakups:
1) Feedbacks
2) Feature Requests
3) General Queries
4) Abuses [Anyway we have a good Community Voting system, which would protect us from this item by fading it away over the course of time].
5) Praises/Testimonies
I feel that this should be an enormous value addition for articles and can be a good measure for the Author to improve himself right?
Related Suggestion: Article Statistics (http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/forums.asp?msg=2171640&forumid=1645&searchkw=statistics&sd=20+May+2007&ed=18+Aug+2007&stype=1#xx2171640xx[^])
|
|
|
|
|
Serisouly, do have anything better to do other than critique every corner of this site?
You do know that there is a new version of CP (completely rewritten) on the way, don't you?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Dave,
I didn't mean to offend anyone. I just thought of sharing an opinion. If I had hurt anyone's feelings, I deeply regret and apologize for the same.
|
|
|
|
|
You didn't hurt my feelings. I'm just wondering if you spend your time looking for problems with web sites.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: I'm just wondering if you spend your time looking for problems with web sites.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->ßRÅhmmÃ<-·´¯`·.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm going to throw the beta site at him this week to give him an entirely new set of bugs to find and suggestions to make while in turn giving the site (at least the suggestions form) some serious load testing 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Will it have its own "Suggestions and Bug Reports" forum, or will everything
get mixed into the existing one?
maybe you could mark messages somehow when entered from the new site?
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this weeks tips:
- make Visual display line numbers: Tools/Options/TextEditor/...
- show exceptions with ToString() to see all information
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are you going to throw it at a lot of people?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Are you going to throw it at a lot of people?
That sounds like a dare, John. The only person that really needs to look at it is Chuck Norris.
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote: The only person that really needs to look at it is Chuck Norris.
And god help Chris if there's anything wrong...
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
