|
see http://www.public.asu.edu/~subhro/pup622/localfinance/sld008.htm[^] but substitute the MONTHLY RATE for 'r' in the formula if you are using 'n' as the number of months.
Assuming you actually meant 23.99 APR, (which equates to ~ 2% per month) the formula gives: $236.40. I built a quick spreadsheet to verify that this payment amount will in-fact pay off the debt in 12 months, and it does. This payment number is slightly different than your number, so I'm wondering if your interest is being compounded differently.
David
|
|
|
|
|
Can you forward me that spreadsheet? Is it in Excel?
The APR is in fact 239.9961%.
Victoria
|
|
|
|
|
See your e-mail account you posted with CodeProject. I don't know how to post files.
David
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have anything. But you can send it to vtoriagarcia@aol.com
Thank you!
Victoria
|
|
|
|
|
Vtoria wrote: The APR is in fact 239.9961%
Sorry, but that is just insane...
Only an idiot would go with that.
"Find it your bloody self - immediately!" - Dave Kreskowiak
|
|
|
|
|
The interest is accrued daily on the principle balance; just like a mortgage.
Victoria
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look at this article from the FAQ of Dr. Math:
http://www.mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.interest.html[^]
In an installment loan, a lender loans a borrower a principal amount P, on which the borrower will pay a yearly interest rate of i (as a fraction, e.g. a rate of 6% would correspond to i=0.06) for n years. The borrower pays a fixed amount M to the lender q times per year. At the end of the n years, the last payment by the borrower pays off the loan.
The amount of the fixed payment is determined by:
M = P * i / [ q (1 - [1+( i / q)]^(-n* q) ) ]
M = 2500 * 2.399961 / [26 (1 - [1+(2.399961/26)]^(-1*26) ) ]
674653127756771870877187207 (which, when rounded to 2 dp is $256.61)
The total amount paid by the borrower is Mnq, and the total amount of interest paid is I = Mnq - P:
I = M * n * q - P
I = 256.60 * 1 * 26 - 2500
I = 4171.7754098132167606864280686738 (which, when rounded is $4171.78)
That is a lot of interest!
Jerry
http://www.mathforum.org/dr.math[^]
|
|
|
|
|
My lad has just come home with this....
A lemming runs towards a cliff at 4m/s. He jumps of and falls at 25 m/s. Assume vertical drop, not inertia, etc. The whole distance travelled is 500m. The time taken = 41seconds. How tall is the cliff?
4m/s
A-------------B
|
|
| 25m/s
|
|
C
A to C = 500 meters. Time Taken = 41 seconds. We know the answer is 400 meters, but no idea how to get there. I've worked on S = D/T
41 = 4 + 25
----- --
500-x x
Any ideas? He won't just submit the answer - he will understand it - honestly!!
Cheers
Malc 'frustrated' Smart
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
"This time yesterday, I still had 24 hours to meet the deadline I've just missed today."
|
|
|
|
|
Malcolm Smart wrote: 41 = 4 + 25
----- --
500-x x
Not sure how to read this, it does not appear in my approach though:
say x = horizontal distance to reach cliff
say y = height of cliff
then total distance = x+y = 500 m
and total time = horizontal time + vertical time = 41 sec
so write down these times as an expression in x and y, you get a system of two
linear equations with two variables, that easily gets solved.
And indeed x=100, y=400 m
BTW: real lemmings would follow a parabola, with an increasing vertical speed due to
gravity, until air friction would stop the vertical acceleration...
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this months tips:
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Luc
Can you go that one step further with the two linear equations (or at least one of them..?)
He's not submitting the homework as we've admitted defeat, so he isn't cheating - I wouldn't let him. Honest!! And it's now more for me than him.
We've got distance = speed / time.
and from that
distance x = 4ms / ?
distance y = 25ms / ?
but now stumped.
Cheers
Malc
....and if I ever saw a real lemming after swatting through this, it wouldn't follow a parabola - I'd stamp on it.
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
"This time yesterday, I still had 24 hours to meet the deadline I've just missed today."
|
|
|
|
|
Malcolm Smart wrote: We've got distance = speed / time
that's a new kind of physics to me: the shorter you travel the farther you go?
as one of my professors repeated over and over: check the dimensions (units must match
on both sides).
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this months tips:
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
OK - we've now got (after punching him repeatedly for using a made up formula....)
x = unknown time
total distance = (speed*time falling) + (speed*time running)
500 = 25x + 4(41-x) //41 - total time, x = time spent falling
500 = 25x + 164 - 4x
336 = 21x
x = 16.
25 * 16 = 400 - cool!!!
Thanks for not giving the answer - made us both think, and to realise something fundamental was wrong - distance = speed * time - doh.
I'll stick to C#, Higher Grade GCSE isn't my thing...  )
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
"This time yesterday, I still had 24 hours to meet the deadline I've just missed today."
|
|
|
|
|
Malcolm Smart wrote: Thanks for not giving the answer
You're welcome, always happy to help ... a little. 
Malcolm Smart wrote: I'd stamp on it.
Malcolm Smart wrote: after punching him repeatedly
Please keep violence against kids and animals down to the necessary levels. 
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this months tips:
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: say x = horizontal distance to reach cliff
say y = height of cliff
then total distance = x+y = 500 m
and total time = horizontal time + vertical time = 41 sec
so write down these times as an expression in x and y, you get a system of two
linear equations with two variables, that easily gets solved.
And indeed x=100, y=400 m
Hmmm, I have an Algebra test to administer next week, and I might just throw this at my students :->
"Find it your bloody self - immediately!" - Dave Kreskowiak
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: BTW: real lemmings would follow a parabola, with an increasing vertical speed due to
gravity, until air friction would stop the vertical acceleration...
For something as small as a lemming terminal velocity would be reached very quickly so a constant linear velocity isn't a bad approximation.
--
If you view money as inherently evil, I view it as my duty to assist in making you more virtuous.
|
|
|
|
|
That would depend on the fur condition, hence the season.
Anyway, initially it would not be 25m/s so the real cliff would not be as tall.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this months tips:
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: That would depend on the fur condition, hence the season.
Not much, even hairless they'd have a very low terminal velocity due to their low mass. The exact value might change slightly but that it would be very slow would remain a constant.
Luc Pattyn wrote: Anyway, initially it would not be 25m/s so the real cliff would not be as tall.
True, but with an initial acceleration of 9.8m/s/s, and the drag resulting in something similar (in appearance at least) to an exponential approach terminal velocity would be reached in 3ish seconds, with >90% of the fall near terminal velocity the initial conditions will have a fairly small impact on the result.
--
If you view money as inherently evil, I view it as my duty to assist in making you more virtuous.
|
|
|
|
|
Malcolm Smart wrote: The whole distance travelled is 500m. The time taken = 41seconds. How tall is the cliff?
Pretty damn tall :->
"Find it your bloody self - immediately!" - Dave Kreskowiak
|
|
|
|
|
and it won't be just lemmings going over it if he ever gives me the wrong formula to work with again...... (perhaps I should have known better... )
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
"This time yesterday, I still had 24 hours to meet the deadline I've just missed today."
|
|
|
|
|
First rule of debugging: don't trust anything or anyone.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this months tips:
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: First rule of debugging: don't trust anything or anyone
Good point
"Find it your bloody self - immediately!" - Dave Kreskowiak
|
|
|
|
|
at least the debugger! Especially if there is a method in the Watch window that has side effects
-^-^-^-^-^-
no risk no funk ................... please vote ------>
|
|
|
|
|
As a general policy, members on this site do not respond to questions that are obviously homework. You should also assume that your instructor visits this site and has read your post. If he hands out unique assignments, you may need to change your user name to DeadMeat.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all;
I'm currently working on encryption algorithm for small embedded systems.....I had selected a combination of RSA and Blowfish.....where RSA is used for the session key encryption...
Could any body suggest a method of transferring the public keys to the recipients with authentication without using the CA certification or PKI....as its dealing with embedded systems and having a third party to monitor the public key transfer is a major area of concern..
Any help in this regard will be greatly appreciated..
Thanking you'll in advance..
sc_emb
sc_emb
|
|
|
|
|
Be your own CA and install your public master key as trusted on the embedded system. Then the embedded system can trust all certificates signed by your master private key. Much the same as IE - it comes with a whole lot of certificates pre-installed from CAs that Microsoft has decided that you should trust.
If you don't use assymetric encryption for authentication you have to save some secret key in each device that could be vulnerable to detection.
Of course it all depends on what you are securing, if the embedded system is a nuclear detonation device or if failure of the system could otherwise lead to mass destruction, then this advice may not be applicable.
Peter
"Until the invention of the computer, the machine gun was the device that enabled humans to make the most mistakes in the smallest amount of time."
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
