|
I am going to guess that when you say database, you mean table. And if so, then yes, you should have separate tables for both. Maybe something like the following based on what information I digested from your post.
Users -
ID
Username
Password
Services -
ID
Name
User Services -
User ID
Service ID
Where Users houses the usernames and passwords, Services houses the service names, and the User Services simply links which services the user can use.
The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo
|
|
|
|
|
We have sql server replication snapshot index script file (db.idx and db.dat). We want to read data from idx file using c# or vb. Any help will be highly appreciate.
-----
|
|
|
|
|
You are cross posting this in here now!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
I posted here because you said it has nothing to do with ASP.net, what do you want me to do now? do you want me to delete from the other forum? All I want is some tip/guideline? I don't know if your are trying to help or tease?
-----
|
|
|
|
|
I've run across other forums that are not so dominated by "rules tyrants" like here. I'd suggest asking in those forums. I've gotten polite responses from folks at www.dbforums.com
Sorry I can't help you myself. I don't know anything about the subject.
David
---------
Empirical studies indicate that 20% of the people drink 80% of the beer. With C++ developers, the rule is that 80% of the developers understand at most 20% of the language. It is not the same 20% for different people, so don't count on them to understand each other's code.
http://yosefk.com/c++fqa/picture.html#fqa-6.6
---------
|
|
|
|
|
The heading says it all.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
  ;P
-----
|
|
|
|
|
So SQL really isn't my cup of tea and I was poking through the System stored procedures generated by Enterprise Manager at creation-time of a database. While I was looking I noticed a stored proc called dt_validateloginparams. Now, I'm curious if one can use this stored proc to log users into an app or web-app that uses sql login criteria.
I scoured google as much as possible, and only found discussions on how to remove the procedure. Apparently it's not a very popular sp.
Any enlightenment would be much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
Will the SQL 2005 client tools allow me to connect to a 6.5 database? I want to run profiler and query analyser. Enterprise Manager for 6.5 is a joke.
Or any other ideas for seeing what is happening, realtime, on a 6.5 SQL database.
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
"This time yesterday, I still had 24 hours to meet the deadline I've just missed today."
|
|
|
|
|
Dunno avout 6.5, but it works ok on Sql Server 2000....
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
Try it and see what happens.
Paul Marfleet
"No, his mind is not for rent
To any God or government"
Tom Sawyer - Rush
|
|
|
|
|
Great Idea! Why didn't I think of that?
Because I don't have it installed? Because I am on a clients site and have to jump through many hoops to get anything installed?
I will try it when back in my own office, but was hoping somebody out there might help, not treat me as being one of the many lazy slackers on here who wants everybody to do their work for them.
-- modified at 10:59 Wednesday 14th November, 2007
Apology to Paul issued for this below. I won't delete this post as a) I hate it when people do that and b) Colin copied the whole lot in his reply so there'd be no point!:-O<br />
<br />
The flak jacket is buttoned up tight to try and deflect all those deserved '1' votes.
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
"This time yesterday, I still had 24 hours to meet the deadline I've just missed today."
|
|
|
|
|
Malcolm Smart wrote: Great Idea! Why didn't I think of that?
Because I don't have it installed? Because I am on a clients site and have to jump through many hoops to get anything installed?
I will try it when back in my own office, but was hoping somebody out there might help, not treat me as being one of the many lazy slackers on here who wants everybody to do their work for them.
You could have said that up front so that people would know.
|
|
|
|
|
And how were we supposed to know that??
Everyone I know is using a minimum of 7.0 (mostly 2000), so 6.5 is a little hard to come by.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: 6.5 is a little hard to come by.
It is still available to MSDN Subscribers. 
|
|
|
|
|
It is!  That thing should have died a long time ago!
|
|
|
|
|
Malcolm Smart wrote: The flak jacket is buttoned up tight to try and deflect all those deserved '1' votes.
I don't see any 1 votes.  You don't deserve them because you have made a correction and quite graceously too. So many people don't do that and just jump in and argue back (which just irritates everybody). Sorry, I can't help in this instance. I hope you get your problem solved.
|
|
|
|
|
My last response to you was out of order. Sorry.  A bad day, turning into a bad week. Doesn't bode well for the month.
I know most people on here post a question as their first port of call, hoping for somebody to do their job for them. I have STFW for this, asked around and got nothing. Posting is generally my last resort, and I got the same answer given to a lot of other posters and it narked.
I should have been clearer in my question, but I generally assume that the OP has tried, or is unable to do, what he is asking about. Unless they are from NIIT.
Thanks to Colin for picking me up on this.
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
"This time yesterday, I still had 24 hours to meet the deadline I've just missed today."
|
|
|
|
|
I've been having a bad few weeks like this too.
Though the bottom line is you're going to have to try it anyway to see what works and what doesn't if you're going to support it, even if someone does say "Yeah, it works!". Personally, I trust what my testing tells me, not what other people think works.
|
|
|
|
|
That's OK. I see lots of posts where the obvious advice to give is 'Try it yourself and see what happens'. For some reason this doesn't occur to many people, especially those posting from the Indian subcontinent.
Paul Marfleet
"No, his mind is not for rent
To any God or government"
Tom Sawyer - Rush
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
In my application i have a database table which my client can access, now if he deletes any particular row from it i have to know the updation but when he is deleting the next row is coming up with out showing any gap in between the row. Im using VB with SQL Server 2000
how to show empty cell space when we delete a particular row from a table in sql server?Please help me
-- modified at 6:23 Wednesday 14th November, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sivaram,
As far as i know, you can't have deleted tuple/row showing in any DBMS, not only in MS SQL Server. If you want to achieve this, you can use triggers (after or before, depends on the implementation). And you may also will like to use virtual table named "Deleted".
Regards,
Adeel
Do rate the reply, if it helps or even if it doesnot, because it helps the members to know, what solved the issue. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Adeel,
Thanx 4 ur reply,
Actually the client is deleting from front end i.e VB and here i can see it through database table only, im not able to know which one he has deleted as i need to keep track of the data. when he delete any value from front end can i get a blank space on tat particular row without the next row updating the deleted row.
pls do help me
|
|
|
|
|
No. You might want to consider some kind of deletion flag as a field in the row, so you can know that this record had existed, but has now been deleted.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
Yes, you are now on the third stage of self-help: