|
I used to use the hungarian rg (for range) notation for an array - as in rgKeys - one of our Seniors at an old job consistently told people it was cos of my initials, and copiously took the proverbial...he felt silly when I explained
C# has already designed away most of the tedium of C++.
|
|
|
|
|
digital man wrote: He just didn't get why it was wrong.
It is rather to tough to make them understand that their stand is wrong and to correct them. It is a proven saying that it is hard to straighten a dog's tail as also that in the particular case it would like singing near the ear of a total deaf man.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
digital man wrote: He just didn't get why it was wrong.
Out of curiosity why is that wrong?
a) All the user defined variables are together in the auto complete box (intellitype)?
b) As long as the rest of the name reflects it's use, what does it matter?
c) In a team based environment it keeps a (admitidly fairly rudamentary) track of who coded what
|
|
|
|
|
Lee Humphries wrote: One of the programmers was prone to naming variables using expletives, which made debugging fairly tedious, there's only so many sh#ts and fu$ks you can put up with before it becomes tiring. However what brought the most amusement was a variable for "Volt Drop Analysis" - it was abbreviated to "VDAnal". Nobody could keep a straight face while debugging that section of code, because it was just so unintentional.
I can't believe that anyone would do that. We are supposed to be professionals. If I was his supervisor, he would be fired the first time I saw that. Very unprofessional, immature, and like you said, very difficult to debug.
I'm going to become rich when I create a device that allows me to punch people in the face over the internet.
"If an Indian asked a programming question in the forest, would it still be urgent?" - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
|
|
|
|
|
Justin Perez wrote: Very unprofessional, immature, and like you said, very difficult to debug.
I agree, however......
A bit of fun boosts moral and increases productivity.... Lee still remembers that code whereas I bet he doesn't remember much other code from the same period.
|
|
|
|
|
A colleague of mine keeps talking about an intern they had, and who simply had not understood the concept of variable names.
When he was told that "A", "B" and "C" where not to be used, he felt forced to resort to somewhat totally arbitrary:
He started to use animal names: "lion", "rhino" and "giraffe" and so on.
His variable named "giraffe" was left in the code as to commemorate this guy.
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all. Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"
|
|
|
|
|
jhwurmbach wrote: His variable named "giraffe" was left in the code as to commemorate this guy.
And if there was a variable named 'dinosaur', that module can be declared obsolete too. Sometime back we had an interesting discussion on Dinosaur and VB in Soapbox. Perhaps if you are interested, check out this permalink:
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=2605&msg=2377913[^]
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Well, thats a step up from most Fortran code you see, which usually uses single letter variables - two letters if you're lucky. /
|
|
|
|
|
We've got a ReleaseAnalWnd function kicking about in our codebase.
I've no idea if it was originally intentional or not as it's been sitting about since the dawn of the windows version of the software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis should not be abbreviated too easy to end up as part of suggestive combinations.
|
|
|
|
|
an (ex-)colleague of mine (a highly paid consultant ) had to take over some of my code and found nothing better than to select a global variable and do a replace ALL with "this." as prefix... After that the entire text kinda had a blue-ish shine to it...
He took the code for 1 or 2 weeks and I spent 3 days in cleaning it up... a little.
|
|
|
|
|
we had a young whipper snapper MIT graduate on a project years ago (mid 90's) who used to use the stupidest variable names ever. His favorite was "smack"
if smack {<br />
<br />
} else {<br />
<br />
}
And he reused the same variable names in all the different modules. So you never really knew which smack you were look at.
The worst was when he instantiated a object and he named it after the client. The only issue was that the module was licensed to that particular client and when we used it on the next project it was the first clients direct competition. These "clients" were book publishers so they owned everything and when they were reading through the source code and came across their biggest competitors name they sorta blew a gasket, so to speak!!
|
|
|
|
|
When I was a lad, working in a COBOL shop, there was a test program which used the names of all the punch room girls as variables. I can't recall what it did but it had memorable lines like: MOVE MARY TO BED and PERFORM SEX UNTIL SATISFIED.
Dave Cross
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday I had an opportunity to visit a regional supermarket. Indian CPians would be able to understand and appreciate 'Trinetra (now 'More for you')', which has opened a lot of new outlets now.
After shopping, when I went to checkout, the console showed an interesting error
"Operation Is Not Allowed When the Object Is Closed "
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Least they are using objects
|
|
|
|
|
To where did they outsourse their development?
|
|
|
|
|
India of course
WPF - Imagineers Wanted
Follow your nose using DoubleAnimationUsingPath
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: To where did they outsourse their development?
America.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like the stuff we're working on.... except we havn't released it to stores yet
|
|
|
|
|
I was surfing on SourceMaking WebSiteCommand Pattern[^] and thought to post a reply to one of their video...
I didnt put entered req email field and submitted...
Here is the response ...
warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/httpd/vhosts/quotes.com/httpdocs/mega/modules/node/node.module on line 521.
warning: implode() [function.implode]: Invalid arguments passed in /home/httpd/vhosts/quotes.com/httpdocs/mega/modules/node/node.module on line 525.
user warning: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '' at line 1 query: SELECT n.nid, n.vid, n.type, n.status, n.created, n.changed, n.comment, n.promote, n.sticky, r.timestamp AS revision_timestamp, r.title, r.body, r.teaser, r.log, r.format, u.uid, u.name, u.picture, u.data FROM node n INNER JOIN users u ON u.uid = n.uid INNER JOIN node_revisions r ON r.vid = n.vid WHERE in /home/httpd/vhosts/quotes.com/httpdocs/mega/includes/database.mysql.inc on line 172.
E-mail field is required.
Invalid CAPTCHA token.
The answer you entered for the CAPTCHA was not correct.
Keep DotNetting!!
GeekFromIndia
|
|
|
|
|
They are just asking for SQL Injection attacks I guess? My guess is that someone forgot to set a development flag to false.
|
|
|
|
|
Validations like 'Required Field' should be done at browser itself and if not there should be some kind of validation before sending data to DB...
Keep DotNetting!!
GeekFromIndia
|
|
|
|
|
geekfromindia wrote: Validations like 'Required Field' should be done at browser itself
I agree and it amazes me that occasionally people ask how to validate from the database side
"I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Uh, while validating in the browser is nice, don't you need to validate on the server if you want to avoid an attack? What is to stop someone from writing a script to send whatever they want to your server, or turning off JavaScript?
I could see the browser validation doing something helpful like highlighting the bad field, while the server validation returns something a bit less friendly, like the name of a real web browser.
|
|
|
|