|
this occurs while iam trying to use domodal()
only in debug mode..
it works fine in release mode. help me to get rid of this...
|
|
|
|
|
If it happens in debug mode, then have you tried debugging it? Work backwards from the exception, and find out what wrong information you're giving to MFC?
Iain.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe posting the code where exception happens will help.
I can guess it is an ASSERT though.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Its in appcore.cpp
// CWinApp diagnostics
#ifdef _DEBUG
void CWinApp::AssertValid() const
{
CWinThread::AssertValid();
ASSERT(afxCurrentWinApp == this);
ASSERT(afxCurrentInstanceHandle == m_hInstance);
if (AfxGetThread() != (CWinThread*)this)
return; // only do subset if called from different thread
if (m_pDocManager != NULL)
ASSERT_VALID(m_pDocManager);
}
|
|
|
|
|
As you can see, you don't get an exception on release version, because the code is inside
_DEBUG guard (BTW ASSERT itsef is guarded by _DEBUG).
Anyway it seems your application's m_Instance has not the proper value, maybe you have to check its value with the debugger.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Neels wrote: it works fine in release mode.
No, it only APPEARS to work. The problem exists in both, but because of the differences in the way each is compiled, variables are initialized, etc, the problem has simply been moved or masked.
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have installed global mouse hooks in my application using following call
g_MouseHook = SetWindowsHookEx(WH_MOUSE_LL, MouseProc , hInstance, 0);
The mouse procedure is as follows
extern "C" _declspec(dllexport) LRESULT CALLBACK MouseProc (int nCode, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
The MouseProc is calling successfully when current active desktop is "default".
When i switch the desktop to some other desktop, the MouseProc is not calling.
Can anyone tell me reason for this and also solution.
sharda
|
|
|
|
|
From the documentation for SetWindowsHookEx:
dwThreadId
[in] Specifies the identifier of the thread with which the hook procedure is to be associated. If this parameter is zero, the hook procedure is associated with all existing threads running in the same desktop as the calling thread.
This doesn't actually cure your problem, but hopefully it reassures you that you haven't made a daft mistake.
Iain.
|
|
|
|
|
thanks Iain,
Actually i tried with both the options like
g_MouseHook = SetWindowsHookEx(WH_MOUSE_LL, MouseProc , NULL,0);
and
g_MouseHook = SetWindowsHookEx(WH_MOUSE, MouseProc , NULL,GetCurrentThreadID());
Still in both the cases MouseProc is not called.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everybody,
in my MDI Application under XP i Lock the MainFrame via LockWindowUpdate if a new Frame will be build and Unlock it if
all creation and initialisations are over.
So the user don't sees that the frame,view and all controls are created one by one (which seems ugly)
For XP this technique works great. But under Vista it don't work.
Creating a new Frame with a View and a TabControl draws several frames, slides it, etc
So the user sees all the creation and draw procedure 
Is there a special technique to prevent this under Vista?
Big thanks for answers
|
|
|
|
|
I need some help about the user I/O run-time. Please, help with API or sample code or class.. I have been working on the Win32 CheckMarked platform..
modified 13-Mar-13 5:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
Hakan D wrote: I some need help about user I/O run-time.
Could you please detail your request?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't you like cin, do you?
Or have I missed what is your difficulty about?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hakan D wrote: I dunno, i am not a shameless thief!..
I'm happy about, but it has nothing to do with my question, has it?
Hakan D wrote: I AM NOT BRIGAND, I AM NOT CLAIMING THE BELONG TO TO OTHERS TO THE THING. I'M NOT A MONKEY SO THAT THE BOTHER OTHER LIFE. I HAVE NOT GOT A JOB SUCH LIKE.
Hey man, I'm not a physician...
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Someone should go and fetch his dried-frog-pills...
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"
|
|
|
|
|
I'm no expert on using the console stuff, but can't you do...
cin >> m_pUser[0] >> m_pUser [1];
etc?
As for your subject... I/O can mean many things. Mouse messages, serial ports, network programming...
Iain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was trying to guess at what you were asking. I don't think I understand you either.
I did a google search for "win32 checkmark" and failed to find anything.
Iain.
|
|
|
|
|
Iain Clarke wrote: win32 checkmark
Maybe he meant "checked-build" Windows.
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|
|
That would make some sense. But I guessed at his meaning before, and he told me off.
(My skin is not *that* thin really - I've been told off much more bluntly!)
Iain.
|
|
|
|
|
Iain Clarke wrote: That would make some sense. But I guessed at his meaning before, and he told me off.
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|
|
SEREFSIZ MAYMUN GÖT. PIÇ ANASI BENLE SIKISMIS PISKIN MAYMUN MAHLUK UTANMAZ PISKIN MAYMUN NE IDIÜ BELIRSIZ YARATIK. PISIRIYIM MI SENI ANASINI SIKTIMIN TEKNOLOJISI UTANMAZ MAYMUN UTAN NE OLUR YAA BIRAK PESIMI KAFAYI BENLE MI YEDIN OLUM SEN SAGIR MISIN KIMSIN NESIN AMINA KODUGUMUN GÖTÜ. PIÇ, ANASINI SIKTIMIN SEREFSIZI, MAYMUNU, GÖTÜ, SIKTIMIN HIRSIZI, KENDINE AIT SEYLERE SAHIP ÇIK AMINA KODUGUMUN PIÇI. SENIDE ISINE SIKERIM BENI RAHAT BIRAK LAN ANASINI SIKTIMIN MAYMUNU.
|
|
|
|
|
Hakan D wrote: Win32 CheckMarked platform
Is this function what you need?
OutputDebugString
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
