|
I've Visual Studio 2005, but I think it applies also to VS2003 & VS2008:
(1) Find you library folder path, i.e. the path of the folder containing the file psoCode.lib .
(2) On Visual Studio, select Tools->Options menu item.
(3) On the newly appeared window, select the Projects and Solutions->VC++ Directories node.
(4) Select Library files item in the Show directories for listbox.
(5) Add the folder you found at point (1) to the list of library folders, you can use the browse button.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]
|
|
|
|
|
but i use vc++6.0..so far..how to set? is this same way? thanks....
Li Zhiyuan
5/10/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am using the two stage check box in sdk(not MFC).
when i checked or unchecked on checkbox then how can I find out
whether the checkedbox is checked or unchecked. I am using the following
code.
case WM_COMMAND:
if(LOWORD(wParam) == IDC_CHECKBOX1)
{
}
Trioum
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, Trioum
Try IsDlgButtonChecked function please.
============
Einstein
Seeing is believing.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you use of BM_GETCHECK?
|
|
|
|
|
but how can I used in my code shown in my first post.
I could not understand
Trioum
|
|
|
|
|
Please search it on google or MSDN .
============
Einstein
Seeing is believing.
|
|
|
|
|
For use it you must use of SendMessage with handle of your control.
|
|
|
|
|
case WM_COMMAND:
if(LOWORD(wParam) == IDC_CHECKBOX1)
{
LRESULT ret = ::SendMessage((HWND)lParam, BM_GETCHECK, 0, 0);
if (BST_CHECKED == ret)
{
}
else if (BST_INDETERMINATE == ret)
{
}
else
{
}
}
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
|
You could at least summarise the problem, so that people will know if their skills are good enough to spend their valuable time helping you instead of swearing at each other in the soapbox.
I look at these forums in gaps of a few minutes while some large compilations happen - I'm not going to start following links off site in case I may be able to help. And I'm sure that's true for a lot of the more regular helpers.
We're nice - but you need to help us to help you.
Iain.
|
|
|
|
|
The only thing I do not understand: What is wrong with swearing at each other in the soapbox?
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all. Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"
|
|
|
|
|
jhwurmbach wrote: What is wrong with swearing at each other in the soapbox?
The lid of the soapbox is broken, so falling into the box hurts!
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|
|
jhwurmbach wrote: What is wrong with swearing at each other in the soapbox?
Nothing at all. That's why time away from it has to be justified!
(OK, I lurk in the lounge, but stil...)
Iain.
|
|
|
|
|
Consider the following code:
XYZ* pXYZ = new XYZ();
void* pvoid = pXYZ;
delete pvoid;
my question is whether the XYZ object will be properly deleted thru the pvoid pointer WITHOUT typecasting? If the answer is no, then how does the 'free' delete using void pointers without knowing the amount of blocks that are to be freed?
werwr
|
|
|
|
|
Member 3100624 wrote: my question is whether the XYZ object will be properly deleted thru the pvoid pointer WITHOUT typecasting? If the answer is no, then how does the 'free' delete using void pointers without knowing the amount of blocks that are to be freed?
Well the pointer will be deleted but not properly. The reason being that deleting a void pointer won't call that pointer's destructor function which will result in leaks if you have nested objects which in turn allocate memory.
Always pair "new" and "delete". Don't try to "new" and then use "free". "new" calls the constructor and "delete" calls the destructor. This allows all nested objects(which relies on the container class's destructor) to free themselves properly.
Nibu thomas
Microsoft MVP for VC++
Code must be written to be read, not by the compiler, but by another human being.
Programming Blog: http:\\nibuthomas.wordpress.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iain Clarke wrote: Which you may want to change! I'm guessing changing /'s to \'s will help.
Worked for me, but anyway changed as you said, thanks!
Nibu thomas
Microsoft MVP for VC++
Code must be written to be read, not by the compiler, but by another human being.
Programming Blog: http://nibuthomas.wordpress.com
|
|
|
|
|
It's better now. Maybe it's a firefox thing? IExplore was being friendler about the /\'s?
Iain.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All..Thanks for your replay..
i have the total file length like this only .i wanna create the serial no this total length of the file how its possible ..
Lfile.Write("",Lfile.GetLength());
Lfile is nothing but object of CFile.This Lfile contains some list of datas.
Thanks!!
raju.k
|
|
|
|
|
Do you want serial for files like (1) (2),...?
|
|
|
|
|
hi hamid...thanks for ur replay
like this only..
1.
2.
3.
4.
etc
Thanks
raju.k
|
|
|
|
|
Why have you created a new thread for asking something that you have asked in one of your earlier posts? There are some people trying to help you there and so I advice you to be patient and wait for someone to answer your question.
Don't expect that making a repost of the your questions by creating a new thread will get you answers quickly. If people have not been able to help you in the original thread, then its unlikely that they will answer here.
And seriously, though you have asked the question twice, i am still not able to figure out what you exactly want.
Regards,
Vijay.
|
|
|
|
|
vijay7173 wrote: And seriously, though you have asked the question twice, i am still not able to figure out what you exactly want.
Me too!
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|