|
CodingYoshi wrote: am I using Connected technique or Disconnected?
In classic ASP, you could use a connected recordset to access the data in the table more or less directly. In .NET this technique isn't used any more. There is no object in .NET that uses that kind of direct connection.
A DataTable works as a disconnected recordset. A DataReader works as a read-only forward-only recordset. There is no object that works as a connected recordset.
CodingYoshi wrote: when you bind controls to the db, is it using connected or disconnected?
Data binding in itself actually doesn't have anything to do with the database at all. A data source can be a data reader that reads from the database, but it can also be a data table that contains data that was previously read from the database, or even a list of objects that has nothing to do with the database at all. The data binding always reads from a data source, never from the database directy.
Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
hiiiii friends
i m using asp.net2.0
i want to off right click in my application....
thanks...
yogesh
|
|
|
|
|
yogeshpan wrote: i m using asp.net2.0
Then post your question in the ASP.NET forum.
Paul Marfleet
"No, his mind is not for rent
To any God or government"
Tom Sawyer - Rush
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, I installed .NET framework 1.1 on my computer and a "Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Configuration" showed up in "Administrative Tools" as expected, but when I installed .NET Framework 2.0 it didn't show any configuration tool in the "Administrative Tools"! What is the problem?
|
|
|
|
|
You may need to do a reinstall. I've got both on my machine
"I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
I think .Net Framework 2 Configuration tool does not come with the framework setup. It is a part of visual studio.
Mehroz
|
|
|
|
|
I have heard that initially Microsoft's .Net Framework 2.0 was only supported for English OS, but later they have generated a Service Pack for localized version, can anyone please help me in that “is it true?”, if yes what is the Service Pack number for that.
Regards,
Mushq
modified on Thursday, March 6, 2008 3:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
that is not true. The standard .NET framework is in english and the other languages are added via language packs (e.g. "Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Language Pack - DEU"). Those where available right from the beginning (probably some days later). This has nothing to do with Service Pack 1 which has also been released for .NET.
Robert
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mushq wrote: Here is the source of language pack in German
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=de&FamilyID=39c8b63b-f64b-4b68-a774-b64ed0c32ae7[^]
Am I right?
Yes.
Mushq wrote: Can you please tell why there is difference in size?
Well the second download link just points to a readme.html, because there is no language pack in english (english is already contained in the framework by default).
Robert
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
What a tool!
Anyway, I'm fairly new to .NET ... I'm just doing some debugging using this tool. Its dead easy to view the contents of a DataSet using the native VS visualizer but where is this in Mole ... what path through the objects and properties do you walk to get a view on the actual contents of a DataSet?
Thanks,
James.
|
|
|
|
|
Jammer wrote: I'm just doing some debugging using this tool. Its dead easy to view the contents of a DataSet using the native VS visualizer but where is this in Mole ... what path through the objects and properties do you walk to get a view on the actual contents of a DataSet?
Why not ask this on the Mole forum? Karl and Josh never sleep - they are gods who do not need such mortal things, so they will pounce on the question like an asthmatic hyena.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhhhhhhhhhh!! I didn't even see the mole forum! sorry!
hmm ... i need more sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm ... no wonder I posted it in here ... where on earth is the mole forum?
|
|
|
|
|
Jammer wrote: where on earth is the mole forum?
Here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: pounce on the question like an asthmatic hyena.
Interesting visual...somehow it fits rather well however.
Scott.
—In just two days, tomorrow will be yesterday.
—Hey, hey, hey. Don't be mean. We don't have to be mean because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai
[ Forum Guidelines] [ Articles] [ Blog]
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Dorman wrote: Interesting visual...somehow it fits rather well however.
Thanks - I was kinda proud of that one. It just seemed to flow.
|
|
|
|
|
I am looking for a way to launch an application inside a window in my applicatin. Specifically I wan to to open a command propt window with a window container in my application. Is there a way to do this, preferably in c#.
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Weisenburger wrote: Is there a way to do this
Not the way you are thinking about it no. If you knew the first thing about how the Windows OS works you would know that.
What you could do, and even this is a giant hack, is spawn the console process and capture it's output by hooking the processes output stream. Then you can read from the stream and display the data in a window in your application.
And no, I'm not going to give or send you sample codes even though it's urgent so don't even ask. The Microsoft MSDN Web site [^]provides all sorts of examples and articles and documentation. There are also many many articles with example code here on Code Project. Go find them.
I am also not going to try to teach you programming fundamentals using text based communications. Get a book, take a class, whatever but don't try to learn how to be a software developer by asking questions on forums. It takes long enough to gain any level of proficiency doing it in a more traditional fashion.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-emptive. I like that. Saves time later.
|
|
|
|
|
Can't you tell from my total post count that I am concerned about conserving CP resources?
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
Giorgi Dalakishvili wrote: Is this what you are looking for: Window Tabifier[^] ?
#region signature
my articles
#endregion
Yes, This is very helpful. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Glad to help you
|
|
|
|
|
I have a .Net (2.0) assembly that I want to call using a Com client (a VB6 program) on another machine. I don't need it to be strong-named or in the GAC - the assembly will be in the same directory as the Com client.
So, based on various examples from googling, MSDN, etc., my process has been:
1. Make sure that the assembly [call it MyAssy.dll] has ComVisible
attribute set, and use both an interface and a class that implements the
interface.
2. Make sure that the assembly, the interface and the class are all
decorated with GUID attributes, and the Interface also has a ComVisible =
true attribute.
3. Build the .Net assembly.
4. On the .Net machine, regasm MyAssy.dll /tlb:MyAssy.TLB. This succeeds,
and I copy both the dll and the type library to the VB6 machine with .Net
2.0 framework installed.
5. Again, regasm MyAssy.dll /tlb:MyAssy.TLB (with correct paths everywhere.)
6. Open the VB project and add the reference to the type library. In the VB6
project I can now see the class and Intellisense shows me all its methods.
So far so good.
7. However, when I try to compile, I get Run-time error -2147024894
(800700002) Automation Error - Cannot find the file specified. The error
occurs when I instantiate an object from MyAssy.dll
The GUIDs in the registry appear to match the GUID for my class and the Type library. I have numerous times removed references, unregistered, verified that the GUIDs are gone from the registry, reregistered, and many other things but have not been able to solve this problem. Even more annoying, I did a proof-of-concept of this whole process several months ago, and it worked fine, and continues to work, on the same 2 machines. The difference here is that MyAssy.dll actually wraps another .Net DLL that actually does something useful, but even when I temporarily removed the reference to the useful .Net DLL from MyAssy.dll, I had the same problem.
I've been through lots of troubleshooting posts that told me to try all of the "fixes" in the above paragraph, but no go. Any idea what might be wrong?
Thanks much,
Elizabeth C.
|
|
|
|